search for: untagged

Using K-9 Mail to IDLE on a test folder "MyIncTmp". When there is a flag change on a message in the folder, which generates an untagged FETCH, K-9 Mail responds with a DONE, but dovecot does not exit IDLE state (LOG 1). However, if a new message is delivered, generating an untagged EXISTS, K-9 Mail responds the same way, with a DONE, and dovecot does exit IDLE state. (LOG 2) You can also see in LOG 1 that the "OK Still...

.../136807.html I don't believe this should be a problem, since it seems that neither LLVM nor GCC ever do this at the moment -- hence a new restriction should not be too onerous. --- Which part of the toolchain should untag the stack --- In contrast to HWASAN I believe that the stack should be untagged in the unwinder itself, rather than in a personality function. For HWASAN the LLVM implementation of the untagging personality wrapper introduces a new requirement that the frame record appears after any locals. This is not required by AAPCS and GCC currently breaks that restriction in most call-f...

Hi, I have created a libvirt network on top of a OVS bridge (named vlan-br) which receives all VLAN tagged packets, i.e. connected to a trunk port. The definition xml is below. What I want to achieve in the portgroup definition 'trunk-native-1221' is to allow 1221 as untagged/native but rest all VLAN as tagged. The following portgroup definition works, but I don't want to enumerate all the tagged VLANs in the portgroup definition. I understand what libvirt does on the underlying OVS bridge, once a guest interface (say vNetX) is attached to the portgroup is to set t...

Hi, The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change include : - Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP with the current bridge and vlan code. - Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged vlan can be implimented using ebtables or similar. - On devices bridging a large number of interfaces across various vlans this significantly...

...d to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the > switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): > > ... > Port link-type: trunk > Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 > Untagged VLAN ID : 10 > ... > > Here is my suspicion: > Your ports have an access link-type with an untagged VLAN I...

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

...s (string) In my models/note.rb file, all I have is this: class Note < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :title, :content end What I want to have done with my tag field though is a different matter. What I want to happen is that if the tag field is left blank, a place-holding "@untagged" string would be put into the :tags string. What I have attempted to do is this in the models/note.rb: if :tags.nil? :tags => ''@untagged'' end However, I get a syntax error. app/models/note.rb:3: syntax error, unexpected ''='', expecting kEND :tags...

...he vlan. A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but do not strip the tag out". You can either terminate the VLAN at the switch port (untagged) which will strip out the VLAN tag or you can pass the packet containing the VLAN tag to the computer or other device(tagged/trunk). This device can then pull out the tag. On linux this mechanism is done by an 8021q VLAN interface. Hope this is useful. ta Andrew > > Boris. > > On...

Hello Timo, There seems to be something broken in v2.1 latest hg version: # 2.1.1 (94de7605f50f) 1 namespace * NAMESPACE (("" "/")("virtual/" "/")) NIL NIL * OK Namespace completed. Please note that the "OK Namespace completed." is send untagged. It worked on below version: # 2.1.1 (315f0d8cc2b2) 1 namespace * NAMESPACE (("" "/")("virtual/" "/")) NIL NIL 1 OK Namespace completed. Thanks, e-frog

I''m trying to implement simple untagged vlans on our switch and have misconfigured something.. ISP gw is on the default vlan1 (untagged) Router eth1 is setup on the switch with default vlan1 and member of vlan4. eth0 is default vlan4 which connects to the clients that are all default members of vlan4 eth0 is x.x.x.86/28 This...

Hi, On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:48 AM Matthew Malcomson <Matthew.Malcomson at arm.com> wrote: > > Hello again, > > I have been thinking more about the GCC implementation of hwasan and > found a few more questions that I would really appreciate help with. > > --- > I've noticed a match-all condition in the compiler inline > instrumentation, but can't see

...belonging to the current user: def delete_tag tag = @params[:tag] affected = Resource.find_tagged_with({ :any => tag, :conditions => "tags_resources.user_id = #{session[:user].id}" }) affected.each {|res| a = res.tag_names - [tag] a = ["untagged"] if a.empty? res.tag a, :clear => true, :attributes => { :user_id => @session[:user].id } } redirect_to :action => ''list'' end --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- which generates th...

..., l 255, t 0xff) 13(c 0x0, s 0xff, l 255, t 0xff) 14(c 0x0, s 0xff, l 255, t 0xff) 15(c 0x0, s 0xff, l 255, t 0xff) Pending list: 8(c 0x40, s 0x7, l 1), 9(c 0x50, s 0x67, l 0), 2(c 0x50, s 0x57, l 0), 3(c 0x50, s 0x47, l 0), 4(c 0x40, s 0x27, l 0), 5(c 0x40, s 0x17, l 0) Kernel Free SCB list: 6 1 0 Untagged Q(0): 8 Untagged Q(1): 5 Untagged Q(2): 4 Untagged Q(4): 3 Untagged Q(5): 2 Untagged Q(6): 9 (probe31:ahc0:0:1:0): Other SCB Timeout (probe32:ahc0:0:2:0): SCB 0x4 - timed out ahc0: Dumping Card State in Message-out phase, at SEQADDR 0x15c ACCUM = 0xa0, SINDEX = 0x61, DINDEX = 0x8c, ARG_2 = 0x0 HCNT...

...use vlan in domU, but have something strange: I created bridge on eth0. This interface was configured as trunk with vlan 300, 301. I use this bridge in my domU, and I can see tagged packets when run tcpdump in domU. Also I created interface on domU to work with vlan 300. On this interface I see untagged packets in vlan300. And everything looks fine. But when I''m trying to send out packets through interface with vlan300 something happen. On domU in eth0 interface i see that packet was tagged as vlan 300, but on dom0 I see that package doesn''t have tag and sending to switch as...

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

...f, l 255, t 0xff) 15(c 0x0, s 0xff, l 255, t > 0xff) > > Pending list: 8(c 0x40, s 0x7, l 1), 9(c 0x50, s 0x67, l > 0), > > 2(c 0x50, s 0x57, l 0), 3(c 0x50, s 0x47, l 0), 4(c 0x40, > s > > 0x27, l 0), 5(c 0x40, s 0x17, l 0) > > Kernel Free SCB list: 6 1 0 > > Untagged Q(0): 8 > > Untagged Q(1): 5 > > Untagged Q(2): 4 > > Untagged Q(4): 3 > > Untagged Q(5): 2 > > Untagged Q(6): 9 > > (probe31:ahc0:0:1:0): Other SCB Timeout > > (probe32:ahc0:0:2:0): SCB 0x4 - timed out > > ahc0: Dumping Card State in Message-out phas...

I'm trying to bridge a mix of 802.1q tagged and untagged Ethernet frames through the new Ethernet over GRE functionality in kernel 2.6.28 The hosts handling the tunnel (192.168.200.6, 192.168.200.2) are connected together through with a simple cross cable through their eth1 interface. The switches are connected to their respective eth0 interface, which...

Dovecot 2.2.5 In selected state: C: 1 SELECT &#-&#/# S: 1 NO Mailbox name is not valid mUTF-7 S: * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. I can verify that this only seems to happen when the mailbox name is incorrect mUTF-7. Things work fine if I access a non-existent mailbox: C: 1 SELECT non-existent-mailbox S: * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. S: a NO Mailbox doesn't exist:

Just curious, if I have my Polycom IP 550 phone VLAN tag 30, will the packets I send from my PC(on the PC port of the phone) have the same VLAN tag? THe PC is sending untagged packets. This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. If you are the intended recipient, furth...

...Member` doesn't seem to line up with any such `DW_AT` so that will take some refactoring (and I don't think it makes sense for that to block moving the hierarchy into place).) Merging the two types of files ============================== In the old format, we have two types of files -- an untagged file node, and a DIFile/DW_TAG_file_type/0x29 which references the untagged node. !0 = !{!"path/to/file", !"/path/to/dir"} !1 = !{!"0x29", !0} In the actual metadata graph, most file references use !0, but in DIBuilder !1 is always passed in and the !0 is ext...