search for: unsynchronized

Is there a way to specify on a per-object basis that Puppet should merely report that an object needs to be updated without actually performing the update? This would make it possible to detect changes to critical objects (e.g. config files) that Puppet shouldn''t try to fix automaticaly. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com

...wing sentece however: "The echo canceller should now converge faster, be robust and tolerant of incorrect capture-playback synchronisation." This sounds for me like the above problem has been solved, or that at least it now works in some cases even if the speakers and microphone are unsynchronized, and that it thus may work with speaker and mic on different soundcards. My question is: Can I use Speex 1.2rc1 ? If not, my experience with other systems is that it is possible to do echo cancellation with mic and speakers on different soundcards. If not guaranteed always work, at least in m...

...e week. Today they came here with a LITE3000 to analyze what is going on. When I configure zaptel with no external clock, E1 gets aligned/synchronized with bit rate in 2048000 bps, both me and telco. span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 But when I configure span4 to get clock source from telco they become unsynchronized. TElco bit rate stays in 2048000 bps, but asterisk stays on 2048443 pbs!! span=4,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 Telco1 (Intelig) send alarms and I do not sync to then. I have another PRI circuit used for data connections from Telco2 and I used it for testing. Telco2 (Telemar) do not send alarms and I sync t...

http://www.xensource.com/xen/downloads/index.html The XenSource site seems to think so but I haven''t seen an announcement here. Is rc4 tag the same changeset for 3.0.3? Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...3 129152 114206 [./iozone -i 0 -i 1 -r 8 -s 8 -e -> fsync included] 5 8 8 925 1007 145379 170495 [./iozone -i 0 -i 1 -r 8 -s 8 -o -> usig O_SYNC] Comparing run 1 and 3 shows that ZFS is roughly 20% faster on (unsynchronized) writes versus UFS. What''s really surprising, to me at least, is that in cases 3 and 5, for example, ZFS becomes almost 400% slower on synchronized writes versus UFS. I realize that the ZFS-on-RAID setup has a "safety" penalty, but should it really be 400% slower than UFS? If no...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I'm trying to make a VPN network with the help of my friends. Tinc seems to support multiple connect to options, but isn't it tricky? Will it cause unsynchronized hosts etc? Will the 1.1 invite support it? PS: every nodes are not 24/7 on, maybe a node will be online but another not. - -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.1.1 iQFGBAEBCgAwBQJVCQzzKRxUYXRzdXl1a2kgSXNoaSA8aXNoaXRhd...

I am writing an application that will display a series of images. When a link is clicked the images will fade away, and new images will fade in. I am starting by trying to simply fade the images out then back in through a function: function ChangeImage() { Effect.BlindDown(''MyElement'',{duration:0.5}); Effect.BlindUp(''MyElement'',{duration:0.5}); } This

...; global... but it could be argued either way, I guess. > > > I users expect this to "just work", why not extend the language and make it > just work? I'm not sure anyone really expects this to "just work", just that they did it by accident. Making cross-thread unsynchronized virtual calls on an object which is being destroyed strikes me as a construct nobody would intentionally write. > We could, as an implementation, decide to emit these as relaxed atomic > stores, making the code well defined without changing the semantics (or > optimization) in any meaning...

Hi There Is active record 3.1.1 supposed to be threadsafe? In other words, should the following (concurrent access to a model) work? Thread.new do MyModel.where(some_condition).first end Thread.new do MyModel.where(some_condition).first end I ask because upon the answer, it depends which component should handle synchronization, and in consequence, which component to patch/fix. A bit of

...nd often the reference counters are off-by-one or off-by-two in the crashing case. AFAICS the python API says that once you have threads, you have to do the GIL dance: https://docs.python.org/2/c-api/init.html#thread-state-and-the-global-interpreter-lock . All the crashes I saw can be explained by unsynchronized accesses to python objects. I found the bug. plugin_lock_request() is used to lock client requests only, but it does _not_ lock any other calls into the plugin. Due to that, the following calls are neither locked against each other nor are they locked against client requests: plugin_register (cons...

...??port 123 -v tcpdump: listening on enp1s0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes 10:20:41.655081 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 32113, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 96) ?? ?192.168.3.52.ntp > dwing.mad.mater.int.ntp: NTPv3, Client, length 68 Leap indicator: clock unsynchronized (192), Stratum 0 (unspecified), poll 17 (131072s), precision -23 Root Delay: 0.017257, Root dispersion: 16.000000, Reference-ID: (unspec) ??Reference Timestamp:??3916459101.490509499 (2024-02-09T09:18:21Z) ??Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000 ??Receive Timestamp:?? ?0.000000000 ??Transmit Times...

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > Given that, I'm not sure I really see the issue with just > special-casing any store where the value stored is a pointer to a > global... but it could be argued either way, I guess. > I users expect this to "just work", why not extend the language and make it just work? We could, as

...ish the previous run. > > Have you been able to identify the reason of this reboot? Isn't it > triggered by the PnP manager? > > I guess it is, and, since we copy over the drivers with all the stuff > to > properly install them, the PnP manager will do so completely > unsynchronized to our firstboot activity, so all scripts are in > danger. > > I think this should better be resolved generically, by not running > the > scripts until PnP completes (that includes reboots). I agree, but so far I couldn't find a way to be sure that firstboot executes after all...

Hi, and thanks for taking your time to read this. I recently installed Starcraft II using play on linux. The game is running perfectly and smoothly, but I have a problem with the mouse. In the games menus the cursor seems to be completely unsynchronized with where the mouse should be. For example I can see buttons glow as if I were hovering over them when my cursor is in a completely different place. Nevertheless it seems that clicks are always made where the cursor indicates. In game, the screen scrolls as if the mouse was at the edge of the scre...

...omponent: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: rsync@cpe-24-95-91-210.columbus.res.rr.com QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org on at least freebsd, symlinks have settable times/perms as well as u/g/flags. true, use of a symlink is time/perm/u/g/flag agnostic however, unsynchronized time/perm do cause problems elsewhere on systems that have the above syscalls. ie: 1 - find <path> -newer <stampfile> -ls print if any/all types, rather than a single, are newer 2 - find <path> -perm +7022 -ls print if any/all types, rather than a single, are not isolat...

...aving the same problem during the same day we noticed the following message in their respective event logs: "The time service has not been able to synchronize the system time for 49152 seconds because none of the time providers has been able to provide a usable time stamp. The system clock is unsynchronized." On the systems in question the NTP service was configured to use time from an NTP server that was unavailable. Their internal clocks were a few minutes (2-3) off compared to the Samba server's clock. The situation is not permanent however. A reboot of the workstation "solves"...

Hi list, I have a problem with this stuff, i read many documents about it but i would like to know if anyone have got to resolve the problem. The point is that my vm has the clock unsynchronize, i tried many things and it seems that its work fine but im not sure. Now im using ntpd to synchronize the time but im not trust on it because it didnt work before. First, i tried the jiffies on

This makes the vertex buffer go to GART, not VRAM, and redoes the mapping to not use the UNSYNCHRONIZED access (which is meaningless on a VRAM buffer anyways). While we're at it, add some flushes for VBO data. Moving the vertex buffer from VRAM to GART makes glxgears work fully with NV30_SWTNL=1. The other changes just seem like a good idea. I'm not sure *why* moving the buffer from VRAM mak...

...est for evicting bound resources. wined3d: Mark buffers as used in wined3d_buffer_copy(). wined3d: Move surface_get_drawable_size() to view.c file. wined3d: Introduce wined3d_rendertarget_view_get_drawable_size() as replacement for surface_get_drawable_size(). wined3d: Avoid unsynchronized buffer update when reloading whole buffer. wined3d: Use unsynchronized buffer updates only if there has been at least one buffer map. wined3d: Return location from wined3d_buffer_get_memory(). wined3d: Add support for WINED3DFMT_R32_UINT format. wined3d: Add support for WINE...

...er way, I guess. > > > > > > I users expect this to "just work", why not extend the language and make > it > > just work? > > I'm not sure anyone really expects this to "just work", just that they > did it by accident. Making cross-thread unsynchronized virtual calls > on an object which is being destroyed strikes me as a construct nobody > would intentionally write. > > > We could, as an implementation, decide to emit these as relaxed atomic > > stores, making the code well defined without changing the semantics (or > >...