search for: unsufficiently

Every now and then I realize that my attempts to document what all dataframes consist of are unsufficient. So far, I have been writing notes in an external file. Are there any better ways to do this within R? One possibility could be to set up the data as packages, but I would like to have a solution on a lower level, closer to data. I can't find any pointers in the standard manuals.

Hi, I'm trying to setup IMC (idealx management console) to give our windows admins some nice toy to play with, but I have problem to make it work. I can log in after I authentificate as Administrator, but, I can't modify any LDAP entries, as that fails with unsufficient privileges due to the IMC trying to bind to LDAP as logged in user (Administrator), instead of something like

Hello A few (or a lot) of us supports larger corporate networks. I would like know your opinion/solution based on CentOS. No Win auto/dynamic/smart (WI|D)NS/DHCP How do you manage DNS&DHCP (the informations filled in, not the server software) for hundreds or thousands of computers? For our network, just now we use homebrewed scripts, but they are getting unsufficient (cca. 700

Hi, thanks for your hints! Am 10.01.19 um 03:46 schrieb Tim Beale via samba: > - As a sanity-check, you could run 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck' > locally on your DC. It may tell you if there's an ACL problem. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck doesn't show any problems. > - Instead of an online backup, try running 'samba-tool domain backup > offline' locally on

On 19.03.2016 14:47, Philip Reames wrote: > I'm generally in support of this change. I haven't looked at the patch > yet, but the direction seems worthwhile. > > Note that we already have a writeonly predicate in a few places in the > code (BasicAA being one). If we do introduce the new intrinsic > property, we should refactor all of these places to use the new >

Oh sorry, I forgot that the offline option isn't in 4.9. It will be in 4.10 (release candidate should be available next week some time). However, you have to run the offline command locally on the DC, and you probably don't want to install a rc build on a production DC. So when I set the DC's smb.conf debug level to 3, I see smbd logs like the following when doing the sysvol portion

hello at the moment i have several esxi virtual-server with a unsufficient and slow storage-concept included (or i have to pay a lot of money). so i use separate zfs server (free nexenta + my napp-it web gui) as a nas/san server to store virtual machines on nfs shares. this two server concept is fine for our primary server but not for cost sensitive systems like test installations, home

Dear, i'm a newbie to this mailinglist, so please excuse if i donany mistakes. my question is the following: emvironment: Kernel 2.2.16-22enterprise on RedHat Linux 7.0 SambaVersion: samba-2.0.7-21ssl i installed the software and configured differnet shares. All works very well with the users home-shares and the 2 public-shares i created. also i created different shares depending on

Hi, following situation: 1) You create a raw printer (called "testprinter") under cups and leave the description-field (info-field) empty. cups will create an entry in /etc/printcap of the form testprinter|testprinter:rm=linux100:rp=testprinter: 2) You start samba with a standard [printers] and [print$] share. samba will expose the printqueue to the clients. 3) You upload a windows

On 03/21/2016 08:54 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > On 19.03.2016 14:47, Philip Reames wrote: >> I'm generally in support of this change. I haven't looked at the patch >> yet, but the direction seems worthwhile. >> >> Note that we already have a writeonly predicate in a few places in the >> code (BasicAA being one). If we do introduce the new intrinsic

Le 20/06/2019 ? 11:59, @lbutlr via dovecot a ?crit?: > On 20 Jun 2019, at 02:53, FUSTE Emmanuel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> There is plenty of context where TLS is not possible/desirable. > I?d say that is terrible advice. There are no reasonable contexts where is it is acceptable to send mail credentials without encryption. My users have had to use STARTTLS

Dear all I am trying to build a package, and get the error message: ""packaging into .tar.gz failed"". I have also installed the same package directly from a locally created zip file. In this case, the package is put correctly under C:\R\R-2.15.0\library. However, when I check the package, I get another error message, stating "ERROR: compilation failed for package".

Hi, More about the new --resave-data option As mentioned previously here https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2011-April/060511.html 'R CMD build' and 'R CMD INSTALL' handle this new option inconsistently. The former does --resave-data="gzip" by default. The latter doesn't seem to support the --resave-data= syntax: the --resave-data flag must either be

Dear all, I use the Sernet Samba packages in version 4.9.3. I try to do an online-backup of my domain by: samba-tool domain backup online --server=ad2 --targetdir=/root -Uadministrator and I get the following error: Committing SAM database Setting isSynchronized and dsServiceName Cloned domain DOMAIN (SID S-1-5-21-1996849263-3223042488-349429296) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception -

Hi all, I''ve been spending quite a lot of time trying to install a decent RoR server on my dedicated server (Ubuntu 6.06 LTS), and now, everything works. However, the performances are not really what I had expected... I would like to know what you think about it. Here is my config: 2GHz VIA proc, 1Gb RAM, SATA-II HD. I have apt-got ruby 1.8.4, mysql5 and installed rails 1.1.4 by

Hi, I'd like to draw your attention to http://reviews.llvm.org/D18291, in which I propose a new intrinsic property for intrinsics that are lowered to instructions that mayStore, but are neither mayLoad nor hasSideEffects. This is relevant for AMDGPU, where we have store instructions that don't operate on pointers. The codegen backend understands these perfectly well as stores, and so

What is this??????????????????????????????????????? > -----Original Message----- > From: samba@samba.org [mailto:samba@samba.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 3:06 AM > To: Bernhard Bruscha > Subject: SAMBA digest 2259 > > > SAMBA Digest 2259 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: