search for: unsolicited

...lly convinced that the problem is caused by the server, but may be the network. However, I've had a look at the log.smb file and I'm seeing some error messages that I've not come across before: [2001/02/23 18:20:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(581) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 23624, port 56684, dev = 2580006, inode = 3264116 [2001/02/23 18:20:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(566) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2001/02/23 18:20:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(581) process_loca...

...ed for file XXXXXXXXX/GLB/FLAG.GLB (dev = 806, inode = 348174). [2000/05/02 10:05:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(1050) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file XXXXXXXXX/GLB/FLAG.GLB [2000/05/02 10:05:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(568) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2000/05/02 10:05:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(583) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 27365, port 1432, dev = 806, inode = 348174 [2000/05/02 10:05:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(568) process_local_message: Recei...

hi, i am getting unsolicited NOTIFY messages from Asterisk after the subscription. Is this type of NOTIFY messages is supported in any of the RFCs..? Because, the SIP stack with 3265 compliance, does not support any such NOTIFY messages and discarding those. I need the justification for this kind of NOTIFY messages sent by As...

I'm trying to set up a way that our users can send an XMPP message to Asterisk (unsolicited) to request information, such as voicemail status or the like. No matter what I set for the dialplan, I'm only seeing Asterisk execute the s,1 priority in the context defined in xmpp.conf for incoming messages, and then the "call" hangs up without executing further instructions. Any...

hi. for domain migration, this is an obvious procedure in order to announce the relocation of the guest being bridged on a different host. i''ve been grepping around the xen build tree to see whether and where this is covered. haven''t found anything yet. is this covered by linux kernel bridging already, or is it just missing [read: left as a scripting exercise to

Just looking for unsolicited thoughts on the Aheeva product? Anyone have anything to say? Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com

Giulio Orsero wrote: > I've used > oplocks = no > for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I > decided to give 2.0.7 a try. > [ snip ..] > > - the server is linux 2.2.14/samba2.0.7; it's not the server where I > used to made oplock_break tests. It's another one on another lan. It's > used almost exclusively to store

I've been working on an interactive XMPP interface so users at my office can interact with the timeclock and queues by XMPP (in addition to IVR menu, which has been running just fine for quite a while before the XMPP interface). I'm using sendtodialplan=yes to handling the incoming unsolicited messages, and typically will have at least one point of interaction where Asterisk requests authentication from the user and then waits with XMPP_RECEIVE for the response. Asterisk then processes the reply and finishes out the "call" as expected, no problems there. However, I'm seei...

...e PC-BIB/PC_BIB.EXE, dev = 6911, inode = 680216880. Deleting it to continue... [2005/07/29 09:43:43, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(747) open_mode_check: Existent process 14556 left active oplock. [2005/07/29 09:44:28, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(420) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2005/07/29 09:44:28, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(435) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 14748, port 59668, dev = 6911, inode = 680216880, file_id = 3491 For another one, it says : ------------------------------ [2005/07/29 09...

I am still a little confused about how to activate MWI with PJSIP on Asterisk 13.9.1. I use realtime for configuration. So far I have tried setting both the mailboxes field on ps_endpoints and the mailboxes field in ps_aors but I cannot get the indicator lamp to blink on any of my phones (Digium, Aastra and Yealink). I have tried just the number of the mailbox and also adding the context.

The recipient has requested to have their mails scanned for Spam. Our UCE (Spam) detectors have been triggered by a message you sent: To: wildflower@greenapple.com Subject: Wildflower, Ġėţ ready for Romáňćė in 15 míns - Ġėţ Ċĩàĺĩŝ softatábs at upto 80℅

Using rsync to copy files on the localhost, the group is being preserved even though I have not used the -g or -a options. My source files: $ ls -l ~/working/source/path -rwxr-xr-x 1 blakjak blakjak 115 Oct 8 01:37 foo.php -rwxr-xr-x 1 blakjak blakjak 6285 Oct 8 01:37 bar.php My destination: $ ls -l /active/path -rwxr-x--- 1 blakjak wwwadmin 115 Oct 8 02:06

I am starting to receive a lot of unsolicited email at work. I did a web search on my name to see if my email address is accessible on any web sites. I got a hit on this site http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba/Dec2000/00720.html which is a message I sent to your list server a couple of years ago. Please remove my email address from the...

...this about oplock break issues. [2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2 64 [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(409) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 982, port 61752, dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 264 [2003/10/09 12:55:35, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock b...

...; Filters to Block Stuff That Isn't Spam" or > something equally obvious. I like it. That won't make it even past the sloppiest examiner. You would have to wrap it up nicely and present it as something novel, like so ... ------------------------- Method and apparatus for using an unsolicited email filtering device for altered presentation of solicited email according to user preference. The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for using a filtering device intended for filtering and ultimately blocking unsolicited email in a manner outside of and foreign to the orginal p...

...an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message From: samba@lists.samba.org Sent to: peter@computer-facilities.com Subject: samba Digest, Vol 9, Issue 30 Sent on: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:00:50 +0000 (GMT) did not reach the recipient. Response from the destination host: Unsolicited junk mail (spam) is not allowed. Violators will be prosecuted. Your message has been discarded. No need to reply to this notification. All replies will be ignored. Notification generated by Apdsoft.com Mail Filter for Windows.

I attempted to set up unsolicited remote assistance via group policy, but connections to the client machines fail. A network trace show the 'expert' machine doing a TGS-REQ to the DC which responds with a KRB5KDC_ERR_POLICY. This seems to be the origin of the problem. I noticed in the request, the username of the 'nov...

...I realized this and forget this setting! For now I think that my box does not recognize signal about low battery - I'm only started to read SHUT protocoll of MGE, and do not understand that is this signal a result of some kind of status request from my box to UPS or UPS send this signal "unsolicited" - I supose the last idea! May be I need higher POLLFREQ on "ONBATTRY" situation - about 1..2 sec?! I'm affraid because packet if I will higher pollfreq, the possibility of collision is also higher! - what mean if ups sending unsolicited "LOW BATTERY" packet communicati...

...dpoints. Other strange think is if I set mailboxes parameter on the console, when the endpoint registering, i can see: ERROR[2208]: res_pjsip.c:2946 create_out_of_dialog_request: Unable to create outbound NOTIFY request to endpoint 1001 at sip.domain.com WARNING[2208]: res_pjsip_mwi.c:379 send_unsolicited_mwi_notify_to_contact: Unable to create unsolicited NOTIFY request to endpoint 1001 at sip.domain.com URI sip:1001 at 95.250.29.3:50673;rinstance=1af959e7c0059fc4 Regards El 16/05/2016 a las 02:52, George Joseph escribi?: > > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Annus Fictus <annusfi...

...wanted to host some infrastructure in our data centre, the network admin there wanted a specific configuration for outbound source NAT from a certain host that would scroll through a list of source NAT IP addresses (think a whole /24) for every connection attempt, pretty sure it was for sending unsolicited emails, in any case the association with that company didn't last and I took redundancy after less than a year there.