search for: unsharing

> first <- data.frame(a=1:3, b=4:6) > second <- data.frame(b=7:9, c=10:12) > third <- merge(first, second, by="b", all=TRUE) > third b a c 1 4 1 NA 2 5 2 NA 3 6 3 NA 4 7 NA 10 5 8 NA 11 6 9 NA 12 It's easy to replace the Nas with whatever value you want. No, merge() does not work with more than two data sets at a time. Andy From: mtb954 at gmail.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 Summary: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

...e folder. 2. Right click on Downloads, choose Sharing Options 3. Set the Share this Folder checkbox 4. Click Modify Share (if an error occurs here, usershares need to be set higher than 0 in smb.conf) 5. The folder can now be browsed from a Windows 7 PC Repro steps - unsharing the folder: 1. Open up the Cinnamon file manager, navigate to Home folder. 2. Right click on Downloads, choose Sharing Options 3. Clear the Share this Folder checkbox 4. Click Modify Share 5. Go back to Windows 7 File Explorer 6. The folder is still access...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 ------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST ------- Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are

...09 2012 +0100 x86/mm: Clean up unshare path for foreign mappings In its current shape, if Xen unshares a foreign gfn successfully while building a foreign writable map, it is left with a reference to the old shared page in the "target" var. Instead, push unsharing request down on the initial get_page_from_gfn call, which will DTRT. This allows for greatly simplifying the unshare related condition handling, removing ugly comments and s86_64 ifdef-ery. Signed-off-by: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@lagarcavilla.org> Acked-by: T...

On 12/07/2023 17:48, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:54:15PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: >> When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm >> even if STP is enabled. >> >> # unshare -n >> # ip link add br0 type bridge >> # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 >> # ip link set veth0 master

When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm even if STP is enabled. # unshare -n # ip link add br0 type bridge # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 # ip link set veth0 master br0 up # ip link set veth1 master br0 up # ip link set br0 type bridge stp_state 1 # ip link set br0 up # sleep 30 # ip -s link show br0 2: br0:

Saw this while writing a script today -- while debugging the script, I was ctrl-c-ing it a lot rather than wait for the zfs create / zfs set commands to complete. After doing so, my cleanup script failed to zfs destroy the new filesystem: root at kronos:/ # zfs destroy -f raid/www/user-testuser cannot unshare ''raid/www/user-testuser'': /raid/www/user-testuser: not shared root

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:39 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O > buffers. That requires some plumbing. > > Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops > correctly is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting > I/O to a non-shared page would bring. > >

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:39 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O > buffers. That requires some plumbing. > > Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops > correctly is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting > I/O to a non-shared page would bring. > >

Hi Alessio Yes, the problems you report do seem similar to the issues I had. I found on the Dells that the audio prompts were very choppy and played slower than normal. Occasionally there would be 'bursts' oav a second or so of 'good' audio. I also suspected IRQ issues but the Dell Mobos had no way of adjusting them. Best thing is to try and get the card on its own unshared

Hi, User issues should generally go to samba at lists.samba.org which I've cc'd. How large is your database/how many users do you have? Is it still slow if you reverse the search expression (&(sAMAccountName=XXXX)(objectClass=person))? There have been a large number of performance improvements made since 4.3, so upgrading to the latest versions might be a good idea before any

Hi, 25,000 is definitely higher than what I would reasonably expect Samba 4.3 to handle. It should be significantly better in more recent versions (preferably to 4.7.5 by joining a new DC). When you have slow responses, is that with a number of concurrent users (or is it possible that there are specific users that are consistently slow)? Cheers. On 07/03/18 01:49, Kitsda Yonpladyod wrote:

Can anyone confirm my action plan is the proper way to do this? The reason I''m doing this is I want to create 2xraidz2 pools instead of expanding my current 2xraidz1 pool. So I''ll create a 1xraidz2 vdev, migrate my current 2xraidz1 pool over, destroy that pool and then add it as a 1xraidz2 vdev to the new pool. I''m running b130, sharing both with CIFS and ISCSI (not

On 12/07/2023 02:54, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm > even if STP is enabled. > > # unshare -n > # ip link add br0 type bridge > # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 > # ip link set veth0 master br0 up > # ip link set veth1 master br0 up > # ip link set br0 type bridge stp_state 1

Good day everybody How do i switch from the xen console to the vm console and below is what i have xentop - 11:46:22 Xen 3.4.2 2 domains: 1 running, 1 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 4184164k total, 706684k used, 3477480k free CPUs: 16 @ 2394MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO

Hi to all, I'm trying to play CoD2 game with Wine (OpenSUSE). I have AMD GPU and I think it's the main problem. I know, that this forums is not for driver problem, but maybe somebody there can give me hint, where to find problem. :) I have HP ProBook 4530s with hybrid VGA Intel HD 3000/AMD Radeon HD 6470M. I use dedicated graphic for the game... And I know, that there is much problems

Commit-ID: d4ab7343978bbec7141f8462236ba6a47574205f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=d4ab7343978bbec7141f8462236ba6a47574205f Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 03:15:20 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 18:09:28 +0100 [klibc] resource: Avoid using

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064 Bug ID: 1064 Summary: iptables-save fails silently in unprivileged lxc/lxd container Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the