search for: unshared

...taframes, the rows are independent). > > The dataframes have three variables (in columns) in common, but each > dataframe also has some variables not shared by the other. > > I wish to merge FIRST and SECOND into a THIRD dataframe, stacking the > shared columns and including the unshared columns from FIRST and > SECOND as columns in THIRD. Also, I wish rows in THIRD that do not > have a value in a particular column (because they came from a > dataframe without that column) to acquire the value "0" (zero). > > Finally, it it possible to merge >2 datafram...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 Summary: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.m...

I'm on LinuxMint 17 Cinnamon desktop, Samba 4.2.1, and Windows 7 I can share folders fine, but when I unshare a folder, it remains visible and accessible to users. It should disappear and become inaccessible when unshared. Repro steps - sharing the folder: 1. Open up the Cinnamon file manager, navigate to Home folder. 2. Right click on Downloads, choose Sharing Options 3. Set the Share this Folder checkbox 4. Click Modify Share (if an error occurs here, usershares need to be set highe...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 ------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST ------- Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are

flight 13383 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13383/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13379 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12

On 12/07/2023 17:48, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:54:15PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: >> When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm >> even if STP is enabled. >> >> # unshare -n >> # ip link add br0 type bridge >> # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 >> # ip link set veth0 master

When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm even if STP is enabled. # unshare -n # ip link add br0 type bridge # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 # ip link set veth0 master br0 up # ip link set veth1 master br0 up # ip link set br0 type bridge stp_state 1 # ip link set br0 up # sleep 30 # ip -s link show br0 2: br0:

Saw this while writing a script today -- while debugging the script, I was ctrl-c-ing it a lot rather than wait for the zfs create / zfs set commands to complete. After doing so, my cleanup script failed to zfs destroy the new filesystem: root at kronos:/ # zfs destroy -f raid/www/user-testuser cannot unshare ''raid/www/user-testuser'': /raid/www/user-testuser: not shared root

...r_info("Write protected read-only-after-init data: %luk\n", > size >> 10); } > > +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > +{ > + int i; > + > + /* make all pages shared, (swiotlb, dma_free) */ this is a copypaste typo, I think? (should be UNshared?) also, it doesn't make ALL pages unshared, but only those specified in the parameters with this fixed: Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda at linux.ibm.com> > + for (i = 0; i < numpages; ++i) { > + uv_remove_shared(addr); > + addr += PAGE_SIZE; > + } > + return...

...r_info("Write protected read-only-after-init data: %luk\n", > size >> 10); } > > +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > +{ > + int i; > + > + /* make all pages shared, (swiotlb, dma_free) */ this is a copypaste typo, I think? (should be UNshared?) also, it doesn't make ALL pages unshared, but only those specified in the parameters with this fixed: Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda at linux.ibm.com> > + for (i = 0; i < numpages; ++i) { > + uv_remove_shared(addr); > + addr += PAGE_SIZE; > + } > + return...

...the Dells that the audio prompts were very choppy and played slower than normal. Occasionally there would be 'bursts' oav a second or so of 'good' audio. I also suspected IRQ issues but the Dell Mobos had no way of adjusting them. Best thing is to try and get the card on its own unshared IRQ. If this fails, you either have to try a different pc, or collect 600 euros together and send them to Junghanns.net, and they will send you a quadBRI card that does not have this problem. Rgds Tim -----Original Message----- From: Alessio Focardi [mailto:afoc@interconnessioni.it] Sent: 17 Ju...

...1000 "(&(objectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=Sutanya))" cn sAMAccountName` > > real 10.82 > > user 0.01 > > sys 0.00 > > 5406720 maximum resident set size > > 0 average shared memory size > > 0 average unshared data size > > 0 average unshared stack size > > 1390 page reclaims > > 0 page faults > > 0 swaps > > 0 block input operations > > 0 block output operations > > 15 messages sent > >...

...a))" cn sAMAccountName` > > > > real        10.82 > > > > user         0.01 > > > > sys          0.00 > > > >    5406720  maximum resident set size > > > >          0  average shared memory size > > > >          0  average unshared data size > > > >          0  average unshared stack size > > > >       1390  page reclaims > > > >          0  page faults > > > >          0  swaps > > > >          0  block input operations > > > >          0  block output o...

Can anyone confirm my action plan is the proper way to do this? The reason I''m doing this is I want to create 2xraidz2 pools instead of expanding my current 2xraidz1 pool. So I''ll create a 1xraidz2 vdev, migrate my current 2xraidz1 pool over, destroy that pool and then add it as a 1xraidz2 vdev to the new pool. I''m running b130, sharing both with CIFS and ISCSI (not

On 12/07/2023 02:54, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > When we create an L2 loop on a bridge in netns, we will see packets storm > even if STP is enabled. > > # unshare -n > # ip link add br0 type bridge > # ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 > # ip link set veth0 master br0 up > # ip link set veth1 master br0 up > # ip link set br0 type bridge stp_state 1

...--- 0 0.0 262060 6.3 263168 6.3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 How can i configure my storage for my VM as well as the PV kernel settings and below are my parameters.It seems i have to work with /dev/sda3 and i want 5 virtual machines with unshared storage [root@virtualintranet /]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 4.0G 1.7G 2.1G 46% / none 376M 0 376M 0% /dev/shm /opt/xensource/packages/iso/XenCenter.iso 44M 44M 0 100% /var/xen/xc-instal...

...26.010615] [fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 1374 [ 26.010736] [fglrx] IRQ 56 Enabled [ 26.178909] [fglrx] Gart USWC size:1216 M. [ 26.178913] [fglrx] Gart cacheable size:482 M. [ 26.178917] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Shared offset:0, size:1000000 [ 26.178919] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:f931000, size:3cf000 [ 26.178921] [fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:3fff4000, size:c000 [15605.173216] [fglrx] IRQ 56 Disabled uname -a Linux pNB 3.1.10-1.9-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Apr 5 18:48:38 UTC 2012 (4a97ec8) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

...ine RUSAGE_THREAD 1 + +struct rusage { + struct timeval ru_utime; /* user time used */ + struct timeval ru_stime; /* system time used */ + __kernel_long_t ru_maxrss; /* maximum resident set size */ + __kernel_long_t ru_ixrss; /* integral shared memory size */ + __kernel_long_t ru_idrss; /* integral unshared data size */ + __kernel_long_t ru_isrss; /* integral unshared stack size */ + __kernel_long_t ru_minflt; /* page reclaims */ + __kernel_long_t ru_majflt; /* page faults */ + __kernel_long_t ru_nswap; /* swaps */ + __kernel_long_t ru_inblock; /* block input operations */ + __kernel_long_t ru_oublock...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064 Bug ID: 1064 Summary: iptables-save fails silently in unprivileged lxc/lxd container Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the vmalloc mapping replication as well, but I think that's pretty straightforward. J