search for: unshaped

Hi everybody, i am new to this list so dont blame me if i will talk about nothing.. At this moment i am experimenting with htb + tc u32 filters , the problem is that i want some traffic to be unshaped so i did this.. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 10: classid 10:2 htb rate 256Kbit THIS IS TRAFFIC I WANT NOT TO BE SHAPED tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \ match ip sport 8764 0xffff match ip dst 213.151.70.42 match ip...

...d the network controller is an Intel Gbit (e1000) running a 100 Mbps Full Duplex. Don''t know how or if this matters but the 2.6.10 kernel has CONFIG_X86_HZ=1000 and the 2.6.16 has CONFIG_HZ=250 The idea is to just shape to , say 2Mbit, a certain kind of traffic everything else should goes unshaped. # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 2Mbit # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 sfq perturb 10 # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 50 fw flowid 1:2 This was working as expected with 2.6.10 I''...

Hi, I am new to tc and have been reading quite a bit on how to set it up etc. Everything seems to be working fine, until I started scp-ing a large file over a low bandwidth connection as part of my testing process. Here is the setup: my pc --- bridge running tc/htb --- rest of network TC is filtering traffic from "my pc" and classifies it as 120kbit (see my script below). I then scp a

Hi, i''m running a Bridge/iptables firewall, with no tc filters configured CPU utilization barely reaches 1%, i had to rate limit one particular server outgoing traffic and setup a HTB scheme like this iptables -F PREROUTING -t mangle iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp -s 99.99.99.99 -j MARK --set-mark 2 tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: htb default

Hello, Could somebody explain following issue ? I set up htb class on outgoing external interface to shape p2p upload traffic. I limited it to 4Mbit/s. I also set up iptables counters chains in FORWARD chain to calculate traffic generated by p2p and others. While tc stats show that p2p shaping class keep defined 4Mbit traffic, iptables counters show me that p2p traffic exceed traffic to 150%

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

I''m just-so-fresh to the list, so hello everyone. I''m having a realy hard time with setting up very simple bandwidth management. What I am trying to do is setup a 10Mbit interface to send at only 1920kbit to most of the network (to make sure it hardly ever tops 2mbit). I did succeed with the ingress traffic... With egress however, I get very odd results at different speeds. With

Hi, I want to know is there a way to divide a link in to two? Below is what I need? I have a 64 k link. I want to reserve 32 k for mail and 32 k for web . That means dividing 64 k link in to two for mail and web. Is it possible in Linux? Can iproute or iptables haddle this situation ? or can any other pkg do it? -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya

hi all people, I''m using tc and htb to create classes and do some QoS , but i would like to know if i can do it: after to create the classes I need to create the rules using tc filter : tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 10.0.0.0/8 flowid 1:10 ok, this rule works with all packets going to 10.0.0.0/8, but how can i write a rule using "!"

Hey all, I recently read on a prior post as well as the FAQ that packets can be limited by mac address using the u32 filter. I attempted this and, while all the commands went through with no errors, it is not limiting at all. I''m attempting to limit all IP traffic to a specific destination mac address (00:12:3f:05:43:7f). Here is a quick rundown of the commands

I''m using HFSC to limit bandwidth for our wireless customers. However, I''d also like the bandwidth prioritized based on packet type. This is what I''m trying right now, and I''d just like some input from anyone out there knowledgeable in this on whether it does what I want it to do: Eth1 -> HFSC ........|-> HFSC (User1) (Min 512 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, Burst 1536

Hi all, I''m new to using iproute2 for traffic shaping but not new to Linux. Essentially I have a WAN between two cities that I stream audio over for rebroadcast. Since it''s all done live stability and prioritization is critical in staying on air for our radio broadcasts. My WAN is 1.5Mbit PVC within my provider''s infrastructure so I have an unencrypted direct

Hello, I have recently started looking at tc and iptables. I have an htb-queue with two classes 1:10 and 1:20 where 1:20 is the default. Then I use iptables to mark all packets I send out on eth1. I then filter marked packets into class 1:10. I expected all packets sent on eth1 to end up in class 1:10, but some packets still go to 1:20. Did I do it wrong? Thank you for any help. regards, David

I have a pretty simple setup. I''ve got a linux nat box, with some internal hosts. I''ve also got some servers in a dmz. It looks something like this: Internet | (external network) | | | | linux dmz nat hosts |

Hi All, I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited. The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit only gets to 100KB/sec. It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface).

...v imq1 parent 10:2 classid 10:23 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 512Kbit #mark tc filter add dev imq1 parent 10:2 protocol ip prio 1 handle 23 fw classid 10:23 tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 10:23 sfq perturb 15 ###################################### ###################################### But the traffic is unshaped, i think maybe somethink wrong with the filters becouse if i do tc -s class show dev imq0 or imq1 while uploading or downloading traffic doesnt get to right class. If i take look in iptables -t mangle -L -n -v the packets are marked well OUTPUT OF tc -s class show dev imq0 class htb 10:22 paren...

Hi all ! I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem, and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please excuse my terrible english, i''m french. >From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations, readmes and lartc.org

Sorry I pressed the wrong key and sent the message too early... > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Philipp Leusmann [mailto:philipp.leusmann@rwth-aachen.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 12:53 > An: ''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl'' > Betreff: Why did I need strange ceiling settings? > > Hi all, > > I recently installed traffic shaping on my

My hfsc rule .. tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle 1: root hfsc iptables -t mangle -N ms-all iptables -t mangle -N ms-all-chains iptables -t mangle -N ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp --dport 4444 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp -m