search for: unschedulable

Hi, Some of you probably noticed the fact that we had an issue with the wiki. Nothing was updated on that node (from a pkg PoV) but we already had strange issue when a page was edited with some content that would lead to a traceback. We so restored the last backup (from June 6th) and it was back to normal. If you edited one or more pages on the wiki yesterday, you should have a look and try to

Between 9:30AM and 10:00AM CDT (GMT-5) today, the services below will experience short outages: downloads.digium.com downloads.asterisk.org bamboo.asterisk.org packages.asterisk.org svn.digium.com svn.asterisk.org issues.asterisk.org reviewboard.asterisk.org We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Between 9:30AM and 10:00AM CDT (GMT-5) today, the services below will experience short outages: downloads.digium.com downloads.asterisk.org bamboo.asterisk.org packages.asterisk.org svn.digium.com svn.asterisk.org issues.asterisk.org reviewboard.asterisk.org We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Hello All I'm using asterisk 1.1.X and MFCR2 lib version 0.03pre2. when i call to E1 (connected with asterisk), chan_unicall don't detected event incoming call and show error. error messages: *CLI> Warning, flexibel rate not heavily tested! Rx CAS bits 0x9 [ 10000/ 0/ 0] Line unblocked -- R2 Channel 4 unblocked Rx CAS bits 0x9 [ 10000/ 0/ 0] Line unblocked -- R2

Hi All i'm using sangoma card. connected to E1, my wanpipe file as #================================================ # WANPIPE1 Configuration File #================================================ # # Date: Fri May 27 00:25:04 GMT+7 2005 # # Note: This file was generated automatically # by /usr/sbin/wancfg program. # # If you want to edit this file, it is # recommended

Is there a document anywhere offering guidance on the optimum use of ext3 filesystems? Googling shows nothing useful and the Linux ext3 FAQ is not very forthcoming. I'm particularly interested in: 1. The effect on performance of large numbers of (generally) small files One of my ext3 filesystems has 750K files on a 36GB disk, and backup with tar takes forever. Even 'find /fs -type

On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > I've described that issue (see below) when you were out of town... I think > I am getting more context on it. Please take a look... > > So, in short, when the new MI scheduler performs move of an instruction, it > does something like this: > > // Move the instruction to its new

Just to share some experience with everyone about what happened today to our Asterisk 1.4 box with Digium TE412P card. We had an unscheduled power outage which shut down the Asterisk box. When the power went up, Asterisk came back up okay but the ports on the card were all red. Zttool show red alarm and cat /proc/zaptel/1 show red alarm today. Both incoming and outgoing cannot be made. When a

Andy, I've described that issue (see below) when you were out of town... I think I am getting more context on it. Please take a look... So, in short, when the new MI scheduler performs move of an instruction, it does something like this: // Move the instruction to its new location in the instruction stream. MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr(); if (IsTopNode) {

Hi, when creating a bigger (> 50 GB) HVM guest with maxmem > memory we get softlockups from time to time. kernel: [ 802.084335] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [xend:31351] I tracked this down to the call of xc_domain_set_pod_target() and further p2m_pod_set_mem_target(). Unfortunately I can this check only with xen-4.2.2 as I don''t have a machine with enough memory for

Andy, Lang, Thanks for the suggestion. I have spent more time with it today, and I do see some strange things in liveness update. I am not at the actual cause yet, but here is what I got so far: I have the following live ranges when I start scheduling a region: R2 = [0B,48r:0)[352r,416r:5)... R3 = [0B,48r:0)[368r,416r:5)... R4 = [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)...

On Aug 19, 2011, at 2:57 AM, FlyLanguage wrote: >> On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:57 AM, David Greene wrote: >>> >>> Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to >>> git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful >>> to know what the roadmap is. > > It's stuck on: > > 1) A misunderstanding

I need to calculate some metrics such as Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF), etc (see http://www.cs.sandia.gov/~jrstear/ras for a more complete list). I have observations like start end state 1 2005-11-11 09:05:00 2005-11-11 12:20:00 Scheduled Downtime 2 2005-11-12 13:42:00 2005-11-12 14:45:00 Unscheduled Downtime where each row describes

Hi In an unscheduled maintenance window next week, I will have the opportunity to upgrade to 2.x should I wish to do and provided I can get it working on stage first. My questions: I've seen a lot on the list about the rock-solidness of 1.2 but also some people saying that some versions of 2.x better than others. Is there a recommended version - I don't need bleeding edge, I'd

I was trying to set up gitlab using this module (https://github.com/sbadia/puppet-gitlab) with some modification to work with RVM and RHEL 6. I got everything working except the gitlab service wouldn''t start. The service is defined as: > service { > ''gitlab'': > ensure => running, > pattern => ''puma'', >

Hi Sergei, Andy, Sorry - I got distracted with some other work. I'm looking into this and PR13719 now. I'll let you know what I find out. Sergei - thanks very much for the investigation. That should help me pin this down. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Andy, Lang, > > Thanks for the suggestion. >

Hi all: I apologize if this is a stupid question, but I haven't found a direct statement of what kinds of requirements the Pass Manager imposes on pass dependency graphs. I found a number of bug reports related to unschedulable passes (e.g. "Unable to schedule pass" asserts from the pass manager), but it isn't always clear if these are true bugs in the scheduling algorithm or expected behavior. Specifically, can anyone tell me what the intended behavior of the Pass Manager is in the following scenarios....

Hi, Regarding the mischeduler, I wonder // For loops that are acyclic path limited, aggressively schedule for // latency. This can result in very long dependence chains scheduled in // sequence, so once every cycle (when CurrMOps == 0), switch to normal // heuristics. if (Rem.IsAcyclicLatencyLimited && !Zone->getCurrMOps() && tryLatency(TryCand, Cand, *Zone))

Hi all, I''ll attach a new version zfs-auto-snapshot including some more improvements, and probably some new bugs. Seriously, I have tested it, but certainly not all functionality, so please let me know about any (new) problems you come across. Except from the change log: - Added support to schedule using at(1), see README.zfs-auto-snapshot.txt - take_snapshot will only run if

Hi Lang, Just one more quick question. in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp In SlotIndex findLastUseBefore(unsigned Reg, SlotIndex OldIdx) Did you really mean to use for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_nodbg_iterator UI = MRI.use_nodbg_begin(Reg), UE = MRI.use_nodbg_end(); UI != UE; UI.skipInstruction()) {} Aren't we currently dealing with units,