search for: unscath

Hi I'm working on a project which needs loop-attached metadata similar to the parallel metadata discussed in here. Currently I'm trying to make the metadata get through the optimisation passes unscathed. For loop passes, I've solved that by modifying the LPPassManager to check for metadata presence before and after runOnLoop, and restoring it if necessary (assuming the loop didn't get removed and the metadata didn't get moved). However, the CFG simplifier pass also can optimize the...

Hi I'm working on a project which needs loop-attached metadata similar to the parallel metadata discussed in here. Currently I'm trying to make the metadata get through the optimisation passes unscathed. For loop passes, I've solved that by modifying the LPPassManager to check for metadata presence before and after runOnLoop, and restoring it if necessary (assuming the loop didn't get removed and the metadata didn't get moved). However, the CFG simplifier pass also can optimize the...

...R LESS! http://www.kedrx-com Replace "-" with "." in the above link to make it working. No, she said, continuing to pace. Not unless you can answer my riddle. Answer on your first guess I let you pass. Answer wrongly I attack. Remain silent I will let you walk away from me unscathed.

...R LESS! http://www.kedrx-com Replace "-" with "." in the above link to make it working. No, she said, continuing to pace. Not unless you can answer my riddle. Answer on your first guess I let you pass. Answer wrongly I attack. Remain silent I will let you walk away from me unscathed.

...ention that I did once have a problem with this server and I once had to run fsck.ext3 on the raid drive to fix some linked files. I reran rsync and the result above is a fixed point (does not change on resend). I am amazed at how well rsync seems to work (another large directory went through unscathed). Is there any prior experience with this behavior? Mitchell

...ull-request are not part of our workflow today). > > > - Deal with merging between the two yourself > > I don’t know what you mean by dealing with the merging, I don’t expect any > difficulties, you need to elaborate. Almost no upstream patch survives contact with the reviewers unscathed (and quite often it doesn't look exactly like your local patch anyway, for reasons ranging from expediency to local coding standards). Therefore the patch that you merge back in to your local repo from upstream differs from the one you already have locally. If you are *very* lucky, the diff...

...ur workflow today). >> >>> - Deal with merging between the two yourself >> >> I don’t know what you mean by dealing with the merging, I don’t expect any >> difficulties, you need to elaborate. > > Almost no upstream patch survives contact with the reviewers unscathed > (and quite often it doesn't look exactly like your local patch anyway, > for reasons ranging from expediency to local coding standards). > Therefore the patch that you merge back in to your local repo from > upstream differs from the one you already have locally. If you are *v...

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:32:31AM -0800, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > I think Clang should continue to duplicate this information, the same way > we duplicate target datalayout strings. Other than that, sure, we can let > LLVM expand IR operations to libcalls. I don't immediately see a problem > with that. Note that a libcall doesn't necessarily mean using locks. With

...low for future discussions (pull-request are not part of our workflow today). - Deal with merging between the two yourself I don’t know what you mean by dealing with the merging, I don’t expect any difficulties, you need to elaborate. Almost no upstream patch survives contact with the reviewers unscathed (and quite often it doesn't look exactly like your local patch anyway, for reasons ranging from expediency to local coding standards). Therefore the patch that you merge back in to your local repo from upstream differs from the one you already have locally. If you are *very* lucky, the diffe...

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20111023/ae046d6a/attachment.pl>

> On Jul 29, 2016, at 2:19 AM, David Chisnall <david.chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 29 Jul 2016, at 05:11, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> What I meant by “different problem" is that “downstream users” for instance don’t need to commit, that makes their problem/workflow quite different from an upstream developer

There has been a notice of a breach (see: CVE-2007-4752) as to some binary content upstream of CentOS. I do not address that matter here beyond stating that the CentOS team have responded to the matter, and will continue this review process: updated 22 Aug 2008 CentOS acknowledge CVE-2007-4752 and are reviewing our build and signing processes and hosts for signs of tampering subsequent

> On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:23:34PM -0500, Richard Pennington wrote: >> Right now it only handles replacing a "-target foo" option >> with the options defined in the file foo in the resource/config >> directory, but I think it has potential for doing quite a bit

I'm setting up a server where I plan to use Jails to improve security I also have installed and am configuring ipfilter. Here are my questions: Because I'm using Jails, I will have to have multiple ip aliases on the network interface. I will use ipfilter to specify what can go to each of the addresses. (e.g., allow only incoming to port 80 on the jail running apache). Another

Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> >>>> So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the >>>> development process >>> >>> If you want to go out of

This patchset allows the user to define and manage groups of domains. The patch augments the xm utility with the following commands: grp-create, grp-shutdown, grp-destroy, grp-reboot, grp-pause, grp-unpause, grp-save, grp-restore, grp-join, and grp-migrate. A goal during development of group operations was to match support for common domain operations: create, shutdown, destroy, reboot, pause,

Hi all, I''ve got a lot of video files on a zfs/cifs fileserver running SXCE. A little while ago the dual onboard NICs died and I had to replace them with a PCI 10/100 NIC. The system was fine for a couple of weeks but now the performance when viewing a video file from the cifs share is appauling. Videos stop and jerk with audio distortion. I have tried this from several client machines

I sure hope so: http://duckdown.blogspot.com/2006/03/additional-thoughts-on-why-ruby-isnt.html Seems like it''s getting genuine rebuttals, though. It''s actually kind of amusing.