search for: unsafeti

On May 16, 2009, at 7:47 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > Owen Anderson wrote: >> Some of you may have noticed that I addedd include/llvm/System/ >> Atomics.h >> to the repository briefly, which will be used for adding support for >> threading in LLVM. > > Just out of curiosity, is there a design document somewhere for the > plan > for threading? Not as

Is there a way in R (12.x) to avoid the implicit coercion of factors to integers in the context of subscripts? If this is not possible, is there a way to get at least a warning, if any coercion of this type happens, given that the action of this coercion is almost never what is wanted? Of course, in the rare case that as.integer() is applied explicitly onto a factor, the warning is not needed,

Owen Anderson wrote: > > On May 16, 2009, at 7:47 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > >> Also, atomic ops are usually pretty low level things used for >> nonblocking algorithms or to build higher level locking constructs. Is >> that the plan here too? It seems like you'd want to avoid anything too >> fancy since LLVM has to run on so many different architectures

On May 17, 2009, at 5:23 AM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > Owen Anderson wrote: >> >> On May 16, 2009, at 7:47 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: >> >>> Also, atomic ops are usually pretty low level things used for >>> nonblocking algorithms or to build higher level locking >>> constructs. Is >>> that the plan here too? It seems like you'd want

Owen Anderson wrote: > Some of you may have noticed that I addedd include/llvm/System/Atomics.h > to the repository briefly, which will be used for adding support for > threading in LLVM. Just out of curiosity, is there a design document somewhere for the plan for threading? Also, atomic ops are usually pretty low level things used for nonblocking algorithms or to build higher level

Some of you may have noticed that I addedd include/llvm/System/ Atomics.h to the repository briefly, which will be used for adding support for threading in LLVM. I have tried to provided appropriate implementations of the atomic ops (currently memory fence and CAS) for platforms we care about, but my knowledge of these, and my ability to test them, is limited. So, please, if you run on

>Пятница, 17 июля 2020, 19:42 +03:00 от David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:03 AM Fangrui Song < maskray at google.com > wrote: >> >> Thanks for the write-up! >> >> On 2020-07-16, David Blaikie wrote: >> >In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning >> >behavior for a release or