Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "unrollvector".
Did you mean:
unrollvectorop
2013 Aug 12
2
[LLVMdev] vector type legalization
...>
>This does not sound right. v3i8 -> v4i8 is okay. But the next step
>should be v4i8 -> v4i32. The operation nay be scalarized in the vector
>legalization phase.
What I'm looking at is a v3i8 add. In DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_Binary
the operation gets scalarized (DAG.UnrollVector). The input N is
"0x51c1d60: v3i8 = add 0x51c1860, 0x51c1c60 [ORD=5] [ID=0]" and the
WidenVT is v4i8. The code ends up in the NumElts == 1 path which causes
scalarization.
The debug dump shows "Widen node result 0: 0x563dd20: v3i8 = add
0x563d820, 0x563dc20 [ORD=5] [ID=0]". To...
2013 Aug 12
0
[LLVMdev] vector type legalization
...ound right. v3i8 -> v4i8 is okay. But the next step
>> should be v4i8 -> v4i32. The operation nay be scalarized in the vector
>> legalization phase.
>
> What I'm looking at is a v3i8 add. In DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_Binary
> the operation gets scalarized (DAG.UnrollVector). The input N is
> "0x51c1d60: v3i8 = add 0x51c1860, 0x51c1c60 [ORD=5] [ID=0]" and the
> WidenVT is v4i8. The code ends up in the NumElts == 1 path which causes
> scalarization.
>
> The debug dump shows "Widen node result 0: 0x563dd20: v3i8 = add
> 0x563d820, 0x563...
2013 Aug 12
0
[LLVMdev] vector type legalization
Hi Paul,
You can read about it here: http://blog.llvm.org/2011/12/llvm-31-vector-changes.html
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to understand how vector type legalization works. In particular, I'm looking at i8 vector types on x86 (with sse42 features)
>
> v3i8 gets widened to v4i8 and then operations get unrolled (scalarized) because v4i8 is not a legal type whereas v4i8 gets
This
2013 Aug 12
2
[LLVMdev] vector type legalization
Hi,
I am trying to understand how vector type legalization works. In particular, I'm looking at i8 vector types on x86 (with sse42 features)
v3i8 gets widened to v4i8 and then operations get unrolled (scalarized) because v4i8 is not a legal type whereas v4i8 gets promoted to v4i32. Why doesn't v3i8 (or even v4i8) get widened to v16i8? Alternatively, v3i8 could be widened to v4i8 then
2013 Aug 12
2
[LLVMdev] vector type legalization
...hereas v4i8 gets
This does not sound right. v3i8 -> v4i8 is okay. But the next step
should be v4i8 -> v4i32. The operation nay be scalarized in the vector
legalization phase.
What I'm looking at is a v3i8 add. In DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_Binary
the operation gets scalarized (DAG.UnrollVector). The input N is
"0x51c1d60: v3i8 = add 0x51c1860, 0x51c1c60 [ORD=5] [ID=0]" and the
WidenVT is v4i8. The code ends up in the NumElts == 1 path which causes
scalarization.
The debug dump shows "Widen node result 0: 0x563dd20: v3i8 = add
0x563d820, 0x563dc20 [ORD=5] [ID=0]". To...
2013 Aug 13
1
[LLVMdev] vector type legalization
...hereas v4i8 gets
This does not sound right. v3i8 -> v4i8 is okay. But the next step
should be v4i8 -> v4i32. The operation nay be scalarized in the vector
legalization phase.
What I'm looking at is a v3i8 add. In DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_Binary
the operation gets scalarized (DAG.UnrollVector). The input N is
"0x51c1d60: v3i8 = add 0x51c1860, 0x51c1c60 [ORD=5] [ID=0]" and the
WidenVT is v4i8. The code ends up in the NumElts == 1 path which causes
scalarization.
The debug dump shows "Widen node result 0: 0x563dd20: v3i8 = add
0x563d820, 0x563dc20 [ORD=5] [ID=0]". To...