search for: unresov

...arate 'winbindd' binary, > there is no reason to sync idmap.ldb. Syncing idmap was/is only > required if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' binary. > > Rowland > > Hello Rowland, If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two groups need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not neccessary to keep idmap in sync as lon...

...ill exists.... other Bug, the Original Title was not: No sound if pavucontrol is closed. http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28448 was: disapeared driver selection from Audio tab. so what are we playing? Mr.Bugs changes the title name to confuse developers.. & Austin English can close the unresoved Bug. so Microsoft Stocks go up... because "Open Source is unreliable"? .... Mr.Bugs does not work for Microsoft ? to me: Mr.Bugs Andrew Eikum and Dmitry Timoshkov. are Traitors. LOL. not shure about you & Austin English. i can install Windows again, & everything works......

On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > The Makefile is sth like this: > > vsftpd: $(OBJS) > gccld -r -native -o vsftpd.o $(OBJS) -L/home/xianai/my_projects/llvm/cfrontend/x86/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend > gcc -o vsftpd vsftpd.o sysdeputil.o `./vsf_findlibs.sh` > > > But the gcc/ld still cannot find the reference to __main. > Do I have to compile crtend to native to

Hi, I am using LLVM to compile vsftp to native x86 ELF code. One of it's object file (sysdeputil) contains inline asm so cannot be compiled by gcc-3.4 frontend. So I decided to firstly link together the llvm objects and libcrtend and compile it to native .o file and then link it with sysdeputil.o . The Makefile is sth like this: vsftpd: $(OBJS) gccld -r -native -o vsftpd.o $(OBJS)

...was/is >>> only required if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' >>> binary. >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> >> Hello Rowland, >> >> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and >> therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two >> groups need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not >> nec...

...was/is >>> only required if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' >>> binary. >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> >> Hello Rowland, >> >> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and >> therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two >> groups need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not >> nec...

Hi, I have tried another way: ar rcs libsysdeputil.a sysdeputil.o gccld seems to recognize the file type. However, it stills find unresoved symbols which are actually the functions in sysdeputil.o (can be find out with `nm libsysdeputil.a`) The problem disappears if native gcc/ld tool chain is used. As another test, main.c: ----------------- extern void foo(); int main() { foo(); return 0; } ---------------- foo.c ----------...

...built into the 'samba' >>>>> binary. >>>>> >>>>> Rowland >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hello Rowland, >>>> >>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >>>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and >>>> therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two >>>> groups need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is h...

...reason to sync idmap.ldb. Syncing idmap was/is >> only required if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' >> binary. >> >> Rowland >> >> > Hello Rowland, > > If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still > unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated > Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and > therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two groups > need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not neccessary to > keep...

...reason to sync idmap.ldb. Syncing idmap was/is >> only required if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' >> binary. >> >> Rowland >> >> > Hello Rowland, > > If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still > unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated > Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and > therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two groups > need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not neccessary to > keep...

...if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' >>>> binary. >>>> >>>> Rowland >>>> >>>> >>> Hello Rowland, >>> >>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and >>> therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two >>> groups need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not...

...cing idmap was/is only required if you use 'winbind' that is built into the 'samba' binary. >>>> >>>> Rowland >>>> >>>> >>> Hello Rowland, >>> >>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two groups need idntical mapping on all dc's. It is however not neccessary to keep idmap in sync as long as...

...t;>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rowland >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Rowland, >>>>>> >>>>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>>>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >>>>>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list >>>>>> and therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these >>>>>> two groups need idntical mapping...

...;> 'samba' binary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rowland >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Hello Rowland, >>>>> >>>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >>>>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list and >>>>> therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these two >>>>> groups need idntical mapping on all dc...

...gt;>>>>>>> Rowland >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Rowland, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>>>>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >>>>>>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list >>>>>>> and therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these >>>>>>> two groups need idnti...

...gt;> Rowland >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Rowland, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>>>>>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and >>>>>>>> SECURITY\Autheticated Users. These show up with gid's from >>>>>>>> idmap.ldb in the acl list and therefore can not be mapped >>>>>>>> during rsync. So at least these two group...

...t;>>>>>> Rowland > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello Rowland, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still > >>>>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated > >>>>>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list > >>>>>> and therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these > >>>>>> two groups need idnti...

...>> Rowland >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Rowland, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you take an look on your sysvol rights there are two still >>>>>>>> unresoved groups SECURITY\Local System and SECURITY\Autheticated >>>>>>>> Users. These show up with gid's from idmap.ldb in the acl list >>>>>>>> and therefore can not be mapped during rsync. So at least these >>>>>>>> two groups n...

On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>: > > On 6/22/2016 12:21 PM, mathias dufresne wrote: > > 2016-06-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl >