search for: unreserved_port_t

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unreserved_port_t".

2017 Feb 12
3
Centos7 and old Bind bug
This is my new Centos7 DNS server. In logwatch I am seeing: **Unmatched Entries** dispatch 0xb4378008: open_socket(0.0.0.0#5546) -> permission denied: continuing: 1 Time(s) dispatch 0xb4463008: open_socket(::#1935) -> permission denied: continuing: 1 Time(s) dispatch 0xb4464440: open_socket(::#8554) -> permission denied: continuing: 1 Time(s) dispatch 0xb4464440:
2017 Feb 12
2
Centos7 and old Bind bug
...thing wrong, because on my system, it looks like > named_t is allowed to use those ports. > > # sesearch -A -s named_t | grep port | grep bind > > ...indicates that named_t is allowed to bind to both unreserved > ports and ephemeral ports. > > # semanage port -l | grep unreserved_port_t > unreserved_port_t tcp 61001-65535, 1024-32767 > unreserved_port_t udp 61001-65535, 1024-32767 > # semanage port -l | grep ephemeral_port_t > ephemeral_port_t tcp 32768-61000 > ephemeral_port_t udp 32768-61000...
2017 Feb 12
0
Centos7 and old Bind bug
...s. However, I must be reading something wrong, because on my system, it looks like named_t is allowed to use those ports. # sesearch -A -s named_t | grep port | grep bind ...indicates that named_t is allowed to bind to both unreserved ports and ephemeral ports. # semanage port -l | grep unreserved_port_t unreserved_port_t tcp 61001-65535, 1024-32767 unreserved_port_t udp 61001-65535, 1024-32767 # semanage port -l | grep ephemeral_port_t ephemeral_port_t tcp 32768-61000 ephemeral_port_t udp 32768-61000 I'm not seeing thos...