Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "unrepresented".
Did you mean:
represented
2011 Oct 11
3
Chi-Square test and survey results
An organization has asked me to comment on the validity of their
recent all-employee survey. Survey responses, by geographic region,
compared
with the total number of employees in each region, were as follows:
> ByRegion
All.Employees Survey.Respondents
Region_1 735 142
Region_2 500 83
Region_3 897 78
2017 Jan 05
3
RFC: Allow readnone and readonly functions to throw exceptions
On 01/05/2017 03:10 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov
> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:
>
> I don't understand why that's desirable, and I think it would
> severely limit our ability to infer these attributes for functions
> that unwind. You'd need to prove things -- likely
2013 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] LNT Perf Base change
Hi folks,
I've been running the LNT bot for a while, and I'd like to change the base
run, since the first ones are somewhat unrepresentative of the rest. What's
the easiest way to change that?
Is there a way to dynamically change it in the future?
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2013 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] LNT ClamAV - Sorting output
On 19 April 2013 17:48, Török Edwin <edwin at etorok.net> wrote:
> Otherwise what might seem like a 20% improvement
> could very well be just a 0.2% improvement in practice.
>
This is (maybe to a lesser extent) what happens with most of our
benchmarks, and running them 3 times doesn't add that much confidence but
makes it run much slower. I end up treating the test-suite as
2013 Apr 19
2
[LLVMdev] LNT ClamAV - Sorting output
On 04/15/2013 11:01 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Török Edwin <edwin+ml-debian at etorok.net> wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 01:20 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
>>> Hi Torok,
>>>
>>> I've used a hard-coded list on the input parameter and still got some output (slightly) scrambled between two different bots...
>>>
>>>
2019 Nov 18
6
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2019 16:39, Stefan Teleman via llvm-dev wrote:
> > I can't recall an instance when I had difficulty using, or was
> > intimidated by, email, for saying something on a mailing list.
>
> Subscribing to a mailing list, particularly one as high-traffic as
>