search for: unreported

Hello, I have followed the documentation at http://docs.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/manual/1.2/bootstrapping.html to try to setup dashboard but after I manually add a node it shows up as unreported. The agent has successfully completed a very basic catalog run just adding a file to the file-system. Dashboard v1.2 Puppet puppet-server.noarch 2.7.19-1.el6 SERVER: -bash-4.1$ cat /etc/puppet/puppet.conf [main] # The Puppet log directory. # The default value is ''$vardir/l...

Not sure about 1.0, I don't run it anymore :) But a few users discovered for a small issue that only affects a very small portion of my userbase where instructional correction will suffice. I guess I am reporting it in the interest of getting it out there, and I can live with it if not fixed but it might be an issue for some people. I'm running through my list of issues. Basically,

I can delete a node in dashboard fine, but when I do a search with the Inventory Search the node shows up again and also then shows up under "Unreported". Any way to get rid of all references to the node? Thanks, -- Romeo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email...

...ion, which runs quite well under wine 9.0 (Mandriva Linux 2005SE), but when tryimg to print, dumps with a stack backtrace. So I thought I'd try printing from the wine-supplied notepad; this doesn't even come up with a printer list. I can't believe that something so fundamental has gone unreported, so it must be my setup. Has anyone got any hints/clues, please? -- Tony van der Hoff | mailto: tony@vanderhoff.org Buckinghamshire, England

With respect to random testing LLVM pre-2.4 is doing extremely well, we have no unreported bugs right now. John

...lt;https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/862f9f816ff3ff3cb3f851603f19e99f60a98475#diff-e9b09a44d9dc69444eca2300325e790a0cc6d2c8c3960f47519c7f8ef896f9e4>, which breaks downstream code that relied on this layout. I'm aware of the R_LEGACY_RCOMPLEX variable, but I still wouldn't expect an unreported breaking change especially if it's aimed at R 4.3 (although I'm not sure if it is). I believe src/include/R_ext/Complex.h, which this patch affects, is considered part of the public R ABI since it's included by R.h. What should I, as a downstream package developer, do about this change...

...ay the results in a table and am required to display the intercept, estimates, 95% confidence and the errors. I am confused as to which values are which as for the intercept there are four different values which all seem to relate to everything else I need to report, while everything else would go unreported. From this table of output from R can you help me to identify which value is which? Thanks, Sarah. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Interpreting-the-Results-of-GLM-tp4427732p4427732.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...quot; monitoring programs are plagued by a similarly massive under-reporting problem: adverse reactions are seldom reported unless they are particularly bad or surprising. (The Ministry of Health in my country estimates 90% of cases are never reported.) Remembering to check for possible bias from unreported cases is a human problem for analysts. Which, if any, R packages have proven useful to detecting the existence of a systematic under-reporting problem might well be an appropriate topic for this list. On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 02:44, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Aga...

.../github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/862f9f816ff3ff3cb3f851603f19e99f60a98475#diff-e9b09a44d9dc69444eca2300325e790a0cc6d2c8c3960f47519c7f8ef896f9e4>, > which breaks downstream code that relied on this layout. I'm aware of > the R_LEGACY_RCOMPLEX variable, but I still wouldn't expect an unreported > breaking change especially if it's aimed at R 4.3 (although I'm not sure if > it is). I believe src/include/R_ext/Complex.h, which this patch affects, is > considered part of the public R ABI since it's included by R.h. > > What should I, as a downstream package develop...

...: Demonstration of the Console Functions") available in the MSDN library (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa263818.aspx). With this code it is easy to replicate the "missing output" bug (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10404) and demonstrate several other previously unreported bugs and crashes. In fact, these problems seem to prevent the sound running of virtually all CUI-applications utilizing console functions. Should there be one big bug report for this sample console application or a separate report for each defect? I also wonder if someone else could test whether...

...grams are plagued by a similarly massive under-reporting problem: > adverse reactions are seldom reported unless they are particularly bad > or surprising. (The Ministry of Health in my country estimates 90% of > cases are never reported.) Remembering to check for possible bias > from unreported cases is a human problem for analysts. Which, if any, > R packages have proven useful to detecting the existence of a > systematic under-reporting problem might well be an appropriate topic > for this list. > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 02:44, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com&...

...play >> pops up showing the log in screen. Now all is well. I'm running Gnome 3 on >> kernel 3.17.1-302.fc21.x86_64 on an HP Elitebook 8440p with NVIDIA GT218N >> [NVS 3100M] GPU, 8 GIG RAM and SSD. Can you help me help you to help me? >> Do you suppose this is an as yet unreported driver bug or something else. It >> may be interesting to note that about one time in five to seven, the machine >> hangs on a reboot before getting anything at all onto the screen. >> __________________ >> Never believe the set of that which you understand rivals the univer...

...(new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/page_reporting.h:5:0, from <command-line>:0: include/linux/mmzone.h: In function 'add_to_free_list_tail': include/linux/mmzone.h:791:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_unreported_tail' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] struct list_head *tail = get_unreported_tail(zone, order, migratetype); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/mmzone.h:791:27: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]...

...ontains 0 occurrences of '>', '<' or 'cf++++++++' . A bit of arithmetic indicates exactly the "Number of regular files transferred" ( = 2,744 from stats output) are missing from the log: $ wc -l rsync.log # ==> 441279 ( - 56 lines of stats/info + 2,744 unreported files = 443967 files/dirs, as summarized) Questions: 1/ Why doesn't --itemize-changes report "cf+++++++++" lines for files contained inside created directories ("cd+++++++")? For example, I expected output similar to: (faked output) 2013/12/11 13:54:23 [3349] cd++++++++...

...age_reporting.h:9:37: warning: "HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef] #if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) && HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER < MAX_ORDER ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/page_reporting.h: In function 'get_unreported_tail': >> include/linux/page_reporting.h:10:34: error: 'HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER'? #define PAGE_REPORTING_MIN_ORDER HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER ^ >> include/linux/page...

...f9f816ff3ff3cb3f851603f19e99f60a98475#diff-e9b09a44d9dc69444eca2300325e790a0cc6d2c8c3960f47519c7f8ef896f9e4>, > > which breaks downstream code that relied on this layout. I'm > aware of > > the R_LEGACY_RCOMPLEX variable, but I still wouldn't expect an > unreported > > breaking change especially if it's aimed at R 4.3 (although I'm > not sure if > > it is). I believe src/include/R_ext/Complex.h, which this patch > affects, is > > considered part of the public R ABI since it's included by R.h. > &g...

Hi Oscar, On 10-Oct-08, at 4:44 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > I could add that to my CMake build system TODO, but so far I'm a bit > skeptic about LLVM relevance on the non-Unix world. The Windows build > can be broken for a long period before anyone notices. The VS2003 > support is broken since a long time ago and, apart from myself, no > other > user cares. Seems that LLVM

On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:06 PM, John Regehr wrote: > With respect to random testing LLVM pre-2.4 is doing extremely well, > we > have no unreported bugs right now. That's great John! For my info, are there any reported bugs that are unfixed in 2.4? -Chris

Attched please review the patch for hvm acpi dsdt table update: 1)Fixed HCT test "Unreported Memory and I/O Port test" for memory range 0xC0000~0xFFFFF and IO 0x378 2)Make consistent with non-acpi os by enabling LPT1, remove com2 which is conflict with usb mouse 3)Fixed the USB HID-Compliant mouse when set usbdevice=''tablet''/''mouse'' 4)Fixed Vista bo...

...d in debug shows that 4.4p1 tries a DSA host key ahead of the RSA host key. /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts2 only contains RSA keys, and 4.3p1 (and previous) OpenSSH versions did not produce any errors. Is checking DSA keys ahead of RSA keys new in 4.4p1, or is this just a logging change of a previously unreported error? Thanks Ric Anderson (ric at ms.telcom.arizona.edu)