Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "unrepeateable".
Did you mean:
unrepeatable
2006 Feb 24
1
Announcing new project...
Hello All,
I am (proudly?) announcing a new Ajax SlideShow project.
It is part of a new bigger project starting up, still I am glad to announce you this early snapshot.
Please consider taking a look at http://slideshow.webtwo.ws website
The project itself - as long as the web page hosting it - it''s not as clean as it will be.
I must also admit that, even if announced as release
2003 Dec 09
0
WinXP sometimes is slow opening files / browsing directories
...ed Hat Linux 9, running samba samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0.
We have client PCs running both Win98 and WinXP, but only the ones
running WinXP display the problem. Sometimes, when opening a file or
a directory, there's a delay (about 20/30 seconds). The problem seems
to happen completely at random, and is unrepeateable (closing and reopening
the same file/dir shows no delay at all).
Now, assuming I'm experiencing the problem described in the above links,
(Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 811169, "Update to Increase the
Performance of the Network Redirector"), is there a way I can test for
that? T...
2010 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] Poor floating point optimizations?
I'm aware that there are IEEE requirements for floating point. But all C/C++
compilers like GCC or MSVC have unsafe/fast math switches that disable all
problems related to NaN/Inf/+-0/precision etc because in some applications those
are not as important as performance (for example graphics calculation).
But as I understand, LLVM currently does not have such unsafe/fast math
optimizations
2006 Nov 21
1
crossprod(x) vs crossprod(x,x)
I found out the other day that crossprod() will take a single matrix
argument;
crossprod(x) notionally returns crossprod(x,x).
The two forms do not return identical matrices:
x <- matrix(rnorm(3000000),ncol=3)
M1 <- crossprod(x)
M2 <- crossprod(x,x)
R> max(abs(M1-M2))
[1] 1.932494e-08
But what really surprised me is that crossprod(x) is slower than
crossprod(x,x):
R>
2010 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] Poor floating point optimizations?
Hi Bob,
> For example expressions like "1+x+1+x+1+x+1+x" (basically adding a lot of
> constants and variables) are complied to a long series off<add>s both in IR
> and
> assembly code.
> Both GCC and MSVC generates C1*x +C2 (mov + mul + add).
>
> I am new to using LLVM. I am using Visual Studio 2008 on Windows, targeting
> 32-bit X86 code. I'm using