Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "unregisterised".
Did you mean:
unregistered
2014 Jan 08
4
[LLVMdev] AArch64: GHC compilation issue.
...AArch64
> doesn't. That *might* just be a matter of performance, or it might be
> crucial. I kept meaning to get GHC working but never really got around
> to it.
Ah, I've not mentioned it before, but I'm attempting to port GHC to
AArch64 and the first step is to get so called unregisterised build
working. Unregisterised build does not require this specific GHC calling
convention. Once this is working I'll come here hopefully with some
patch or with ask for idea/help with modification of AArch64 target
support to make GHC calling convention a reality. But certainly I'm not
ther...
2011 Oct 14
1
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention.
...64
platform, but the patch just enhances this support to also support ARM
platform and its really just ARM specific hence not affecting any other
platform.
By including this patch you will easy adoption of GHC on ARM platform,
and although GHC is already available on ARM platform in its
"unregisterised" form, when LLVM is available with patch applied, GHC
might be build in "registerised" form. This provides not only a lot of
nice features of GHC (GHCi, Template Haskell, DPH etc.) but also
significant performance improvement[3]. This all is missing from
"unregisterised"...