search for: unpredictably

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 749 matches for "unpredictably".

Did you mean: unpredictable
2011 Aug 12
1
[LLVMdev] New ARM disassembler - unpredictable instructions
Hi James, On Aug 12, 2011, at 1:02 AM, James Molloy wrote: > I’ve got a load of examples for this, but I’ll pick one. > > echo '0xB0 0x00 0x00 0x00' |/work/llvm-cmake2/build/bin/llvm-mc -arch arm --disassemble – > strheq r0, [r0], -r0 > > This instruction encoding is marked UNPREDICTABLE. The question is: does a disassembly of it have value? One use case put
2011 Aug 11
1
[LLVMdev] New ARM disassembler - unpredictable instructions
On Aug 11, 2011, at 1:32 AM, James Molloy wrote: > Hi, > > I’m looking at the new ARM disassembler, and performing testing to see if there are any obvious bugs I can fix. Overall it looks really nice – I’ve only found one obvious bug that I’m packaging up a patch for now. Glad you're liking it! I haven't really done comprehensive testing yet—it passes all the decoding tests
2017 May 18
2
Computing loop trip counts with Scalar evolution
Hello. I tried to get the trip count of a loop with Scalar evolution. I got inspired from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13834364/how-to-get-loop-bounds-in-llvm . However the analysis described there doesn't work well for the second inner loop of thes function below (although if we declare Bcols a short it works well): void MatMul(int Arows, int Acols, int Brows, int
2019 Jan 15
2
Issues with using scalar evolution with newer versions of LLVM IR
Hello, I am trying to use scalar evolution pass using following command; opt -analyze -mem2reg -indvars -loop-simplify -scalar-evolution < vec.bc when vec.bc is generated using newer version of LLVM i.e LLVM 6 and 7 i get following message in the end; Determining loop execution counts for: @main Loop %8: Unpredictable backedge-taken count. Loop %8: Unpredictable max backedge-taken count. Loop
2011 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] New ARM disassembler - unpredictable instructions
Hi, I'm looking at the new ARM disassembler, and performing testing to see if there are any obvious bugs I can fix. Overall it looks really nice - I've only found one obvious bug that I'm packaging up a patch for now. Currently it does not provide information as to whether a particular bitpattern was UNPREDICTABLE or not. For example, an invalid bitpattern may return correct
2002 Jul 08
0
[Bug 341] New: Return Code unpredictable
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 Summary: Return Code unpredictable Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: norbert.weuster at
2019 Jan 16
3
Issues with using scalar evolution with newer versions of LLVM IR
Thank You.. I used following command to generate .bc or .ll /Documents/clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04/bin/clang -O0 -emit-llvm -S -o vec4.ll vecsum.c /Documents/clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04/bin/clang -O0 -emit-llvm -S -o vec7.ll vecsum.c On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:49 AM Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > It is hard to tell
2013 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Definition of RegisterClass for load instruction in Thumb2
Hi Junbum, > I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced? They're not allocated during CodeGen because of the Reserved.set(…) calls in
2010 Aug 09
2
ZFS with EMC PowerPath
On some machines running PowerPath, there''s sometimes issues after an update/upgrade of the PowerPath software. Sometimes the pseudo devices get remapped and change names. ZFS appears to handle it OK, however sometimes it then references half native device names and half the emcpower pseudo device names. So the SA can easily be confused. Is there a way to tell ZFS which device names
2012 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] MC Hammer Test results
Hello everyone At EuroLLVM I presented some testing work we have been doing on improving correctness of the MC Layer for ARM. There seemed to be interest from the community in seeing the results of this test suite. Background ----------- We are using a test suite, called MC Hammer, that compares MC with an ARM in-house implementation of the same functionality. The test space for this suite is
2002 Jul 09
2
[Bug 341] Return Code unpredictable
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 ------- Additional Comments From norbert.weuster at mgi.de 2002-07-09 15:44 ------- the optinal Flags -n and/or -T doesn't change the situation ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Sep 23
0
[Bug 341] Return Code unpredictable
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 ------- Additional Comments From john.osell at telus.com 2002-09-24 09:39 ------- I have the same problem. The script as follows is run from cron: while [ 1 ] do ssh <hostname> date echo $? done The script returns 255 anywhere from 2-20% of the time when run from cron and works perfectly fine when run from the command line. I
2003 Jan 07
2
[Bug 341] Return Code unpredictable
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-07 18:26 ------- Please verify that this is still the case with 3.5p1 (2.9 is ooold) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2003 Feb 26
1
[Bug 341] Return Code unpredictable
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341 gq at cs.msu.su changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From gq at cs.msu.su 2003-02-27 05:42 ------- I have
2005 Jan 18
2
Outbound calls unpredictable
I've been looking through the archives and have not been able to find anyone with a similar problem but perhaps I'm not searching in the right places. The problem is that my outbound call sometimes go though and sometimes don't. If someone can point me in the right direction it will be highly appreciated.
2004 Jun 29
0
The '!' in the path names causes unpredictable results with directory listings
I filed this as a bug, but wanted to post this to the ng to check if anyone has ever seen this. I'm using samba 3.0.4. This is a somewhat weird situation, so please bear with me through the description. The following path: "C:\! 01 Carte Geografiche\carte\" When read with smbclient the windows share will only show 160 files in the folder. When read on the windows machine it
2012 Nov 01
0
Group membership lost unpredictably
Hi, I have a very bizarre problem linking to my Active Directory from my Ubuntu 11.10 system. I have three AD users setup with them belonging to a specific AD group. When I first login a user onto my Ubuntu system, that user is shown to be a member of the group: wbinfo -r <user> And if I show the group members, it also lists my user: wbinfo --gid-info <gid> However - after a
2009 Jun 05
1
Slow/unpredictive response of post_form from rails lib
Hi friends, I''m facing a very strange problem... I consume a webservice from within my rails app. I''ve written a thin wrapper around the webservice using Net::HTTP.post_form However, when calling the API from within my controllers, the API calls randomly fail, complaining about timeout. But - when I wrote a simple iterative test (500 iterations), calling the same webservice
2013 Sep 11
0
Unpredictable behaviour of several network shares
Hello, I have recently started having problems with my installation of Samba that I can't attribute to any single cause. On some of the computers I have networked (like 2-3 of total 40) sometimes I can't access some shares (again, 2-3 shares from 26 total). When this error occurs, Windows client tells me I might not have proper privileges but I can access the same share with the same
2015 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] bitwise ops on booleans
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de > wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:51:38PM -0600, Sanjay Patel wrote: > > Assuming the transform is correct, what is the recommended way to write > > this in C/C++ to achieve the desired effect: we want both comparisons to > be > > evaluated (do *not* want short-circuiting)? > >