search for: unpluging

virtio-scsi currently has limit of 8 outstanding notifications so when more that 8 LUNs are unplugged, some are missed. Commit 5ff843721467 ("scsi: virtio_scsi: unplug LUNs when events missed") Fixed this by checking the 'event overflow' bit and manually scanned the bus to see which LUNs are still there. However there is a corner case when all LUNs are unplugged. In this case

On 07/19/2013 04:16 AM, Amit Shah wrote: > If a port gets unplugged while a user is blocked on read(), -ENODEV is > returned. However, subsequent read()s returned 0, indicating there's no > host-side connection (but not indicating the device went away). > > This also happened when a port was unplugged and the user didn't have > any blocking operation pending. If the

On 07/19/2013 04:16 AM, Amit Shah wrote: > If a port gets unplugged while a user is blocked on read(), -ENODEV is > returned. However, subsequent read()s returned 0, indicating there's no > host-side connection (but not indicating the device went away). > > This also happened when a port was unplugged and the user didn't have > any blocking operation pending. If the

I am running Xen 4 and want users to be able to install arbitrary HVM images. We want both PV and emulated drivers to appear. The reason for this is for compatibility with images that were prepared for Xen 3.3, which assume emulated devices exist at boot time (particularly for running the boot loader). If I do not specify on the boot line xen_emul_unplug=never, then under some guest OS''s

Hello, This series fixes a few bugs and races with port unplug and the various file operations: read(), write(), close() and poll(). There still might be more races lurking, but testing this series looks good to at least solve the easily-triggerable ones. I've run the virtio-serial testsuite and a few open/close/unplug tests, and haven't seen any badness. I've marked these patches

Hello, This series fixes a few bugs and races with port unplug and the various file operations: read(), write(), close() and poll(). There still might be more races lurking, but testing this series looks good to at least solve the easily-triggerable ones. I've run the virtio-serial testsuite and a few open/close/unplug tests, and haven't seen any badness. I've marked these patches

On 02.03.20 14:49, David Hildenbrand wrote: > This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: > https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v1 > > The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible, > cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution that avoids many limitations > imposed by existing technologies, architectures, and

Hello, This series fixes a few races with port unplug and the various file operations: read(), write(), close() and poll(). There still might be more races lurking, but testing this series looks good to at least solve the easily-triggerable ones. I've run the virtio-serial testsuite and a few open/close/unplug tests, and haven't seen any badness. I've marked these patches for

Hello, This series fixes a few races with port unplug and the various file operations: read(), write(), close() and poll(). There still might be more races lurking, but testing this series looks good to at least solve the easily-triggerable ones. I've run the virtio-serial testsuite and a few open/close/unplug tests, and haven't seen any badness. I've marked these patches for

I just had a DomU start up where for some reason the qemu devices failed to be unplugged. Fortunately Windows saw this as two paths to the same disk instead of two separate disks so nothing got scrambled, but the network was dropping out all the time etc. Are there any circumstances under which the qemu unplug could fail to work? And if so, how could I tell? More likely some race condition in

Long time no RFC! I finally had time to get the next version of the Linux driver side of virtio-mem into shape, incorporating ideas and feedback from previous discussions. This RFC is based on the series currently on the mm list: - [PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits() - [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Export generic_online_page() - [PATCH v4 0/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink zones before

Hello, This series fixes a few bugs and races with port unplug and the various file operations: read(), write() and close(). I started coding up an alternative locking mechanism based on the discussion earlier in this series, but some of what we already have has to remain, and the new code is sufficiently different, so I'd rather it bakes for a while, and I ensure there are no regressions

Hello, This series fixes a few bugs and races with port unplug and the various file operations: read(), write() and close(). I started coding up an alternative locking mechanism based on the discussion earlier in this series, but some of what we already have has to remain, and the new code is sufficiently different, so I'd rather it bakes for a while, and I ensure there are no regressions

On 07/19/2013 04:16 AM, Amit Shah wrote: > Between poll() being called and processed, the port can be unplugged. > Check if this happened, and bail out. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c

On 07/19/2013 04:16 AM, Amit Shah wrote: > Between poll() being called and processed, the port can be unplugged. > Check if this happened, and bail out. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c

Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> writes: > On (Mon) 22 Jul 2013 [15:26:22], Rusty Russell wrote: >> Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> writes: >> > The removal functions act on the vqs, and the vq operations need to be >> > locked. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> >> >> How can userspace

Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> writes: > On (Mon) 22 Jul 2013 [15:26:22], Rusty Russell wrote: >> Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> writes: >> > The removal functions act on the vqs, and the vq operations need to be >> > locked. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> >> >> How can userspace

Hi, i'm playing a bit around with vcpus. My guest is Windows 10 1903. This is the excerpt from the config: ... <vcpu placement='static' current='2'>4</vcpu> <vcpus> <vcpu id='0' enabled='yes' hotpluggable='no'/> <vcpu id='1' enabled='yes' hotpluggable='yes'/> <vcpu id='2'

This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4 The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible, cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution that avoids many limitations imposed by existing technologies, architectures, and interfaces. More details can be found below and in linked material. This

This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4 The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible, cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution that avoids many limitations imposed by existing technologies, architectures, and interfaces. More details can be found below and in linked material. This