search for: unpleasing

I've run into an unpleasant oddity involving the interaction of environments and generic functions. I want to check my diagnosis, and see if there is a good way to avoid the problem. Problem: A library defines "foo" <- function(object) 1 setMethod("foo", c("matrix"), function(object) 30) After loading the library foo(0) is 1 foo(matrix()) is 30 foo is a

There is a conflict in glibc between <linux/in.h> and <netinet/in.h>: one defines protocols with an enum, the other does the same, but adds a self-define for every enumerated value. #define IPPROTO_IP IPPROTO_IP This means the two cannot be mixed, and since loads of include files refer to <netinet/in.h>, effectively <linux/in.h> cannot be used with glibc. Since

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 2:02?PM Antoine Fabri <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks and good point about unspecified behavior. The way it behaves now > (when it doesn't ignore) is more consistent with data.frame() though so I > prefer that to a "warn and ignore" behaviour: > > data.frame(a = 1, b = 2, 3) > > #> a b X3 > > #> 1 1 2 3

>>>>> Gabriel Becker >>>>> on Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:37:18 -0800 writes: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 2:02?PM Antoine Fabri > <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks and good point about unspecified behavior. The way >> it behaves now (when it doesn't ignore) is more >> consistent with data.frame() though so I

This patch adds a facility to block on a particular event channel, for when a domain needs to block, but cannot enable interrupts. A domain uses the call something like this: while (1) { clear_evtchn_pending(evtchn); if (check_for_data(evtchn)) break; HYPERVISOR_block_on(evtchn); } The clear of the pending is needed to ensure that any subsequent calls to block_on() don''t

I am probably mistaken but it looks to me like the design of much of the data.frame infrastructure not only does not insist you give columns names, but even has all kinds of options such as check.names and fix.empty.names https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/base/versions/3.6.2/topics/data.frame During the lifetime of a column, it can get removed, renamed, transfomed in many ways and so on. A

  Hi,    it there  any way how to look into samba ldap in the same way I can look into OpenLdap via LDAPAdmin, ldap tools etc, when I know OpenLDAP "root" dn and password? Is there such "root" user for Samba AD LDAP?    We have a lot of scripts based on "ldapsearch" (without authentification) and "ldapmodify" (with ldap authentification). It would be very

I just tried to update a bugzilla PR, and got the following unpleasant message: > Insufficient disk space; try again later Insufficient disk space; > try again later returntosender: cannot select queue for bugzilla- > daemon Insufficient disk space; try again later returntosender: > cannot select queue for postmaster putbody: write error: No space > left on device Error

Due to unpleasant (but arguably valid) policy changes at work, any SSH server within the work firewall must accept only PKI authentication. Unless we can convince the higher-ups otherwise, we will also have to use the commercial SSH server within the firewall. Of course, I should be able to use whatever client I like. Unfortunately, it is not clear that I can get OpenSSH to use PKI authentication.

Hello list, a quick question. Right now I have a combination of MIT Kerberos, OpenLDAP and SSSD for authenticating my users. Is there a way that Samba can use this setup to perform user authentication. I only want to access the shares of the Samba server from about 8 Windows computers. I am aware that I cannot make an Active Directory out of this. At the moment I have stored the users in a local

Hi all, I just had a rather unpleasant experience. After considerable work I finally got a script working and set it to run. It had some memory allocation problems when I came back so I used Windows to stop it. During that process it told me that the script had been changed and asked if I wanted to save it. Not being positive that I'd saved the very last changes I said yes. Now when I

Le 06/12/2018 ? 18:54, John Hodrien a ?crit : > > Do you remember just how bad Gnome3 was in RHEL 7.0? It was unstable > and insecure, certainly when used with nvidia drivers. I can't see > how you could justify the effort it would have required to > effectively support an unsupported version of Gnome3, and backporting > I think would have been more than deeply unpleasant.

Greetings. I've got some analysis problems I'm trying to solve, the raw data for which are accumulated in a bunch of time-and-date-based files. /some/path/2005-01-02-00-00-02 etc. The best 'read all these files' method I've seen in the r-help archives comes down to for (df in my_list_of_filenames ) { dat <- rbind(dat,my_read_function(df)) } which,

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:46:46AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: > > There are two outstanding issues. virtio_net warns if DMA debugging > > is on because it does DMA from the stack. (The warning is correct.) > > This also is likely to do something unpleasant to s390. > >

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:46:46AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote: > > There are two outstanding issues. virtio_net warns if DMA debugging > > is on because it does DMA from the stack. (The warning is correct.) > > This also is likely to do something unpleasant to s390. > >

Hi R lovers! I am a beginner in coding with R so my question may be very easily solved but I don't know how. I have written the following function in a .txt file ClearDelta <- function(Matrix) { ncol<-ncol(Matrix);nrow<-nrow(Matrix); for (i in 1:nrow) { for (j in 1:(ncol-1)) {if (Matrix[i,j]==NA) (NA->Matrix[i,j+1])} }

Thanks and good point about unspecified behavior. The way it behaves now (when it doesn't ignore) is more consistent with data.frame() though so I prefer that to a "warn and ignore" behaviour: data.frame(a = 1, b = 2, 3) #> a b X3 #> 1 1 2 3 data.frame(a = 1, 2, 3) #> a X2 X3 #> 1 1 2 3 (and in general warnings make for unpleasant debugging so I prefer

On 11.12.18 15:23, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:09:39 +0100 > tseegerkrb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> a quick question. Right now I have a combination of MIT Kerberos, >> OpenLDAP and SSSD for authenticating my users. Is there a way that >> Samba can use this setup to perform user

...;) ) I did neglect to find out that you can not manually set the IRQ's on this motherboard. I am now stuck sharing an IRQ with the ethernet controller and no foreseeable end to my dilemma. I have a Digium TE210P and zttest consistently runs at 99.97% which as you guessed, is giving rather unpleasing sound quality. My options as I see it are: 1. Buy a new server 2. Buy a sangoma A102U I am looking for practical suggestions from those of you out there who have had a similar experience that may aid me in making this decision. Thank you, Sean

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a resolution. > Thanks for the link, completely missed when googled the issue. I think no consensus was reached (I cannot find any commit in the repository addressing such