search for: unpicking

Hello R users, I have a little problem with a for loop. Below there is an simple example of my problem. I want to delet the commas in the character string. Fore this reason I create a for loop to unpick the string and rebuild him without the commas. The problem is, that "paste" does not work in the loop as I expected. text <- "aaa,bbb,ccc,ddd" characterseq <-

Hi, PR17975 was caused by r191059 which was reverted on the 3.4 branch in r196521. However, the problem still occurs with trunk (confirmed as of r206186). >From a thread on cfe-commits I see that Kai Nacke (the author of r191059) was working on a patch to fix PR17975, but the conversation ends: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131202/197968.html So my question

Lamar Owen wrote: > On 11/28/2017 12:04 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Thanks, Lamar! that is very instructive. > You're welcome. > >> I was always unimpressed with >> persistence of attempts to make more secure (less pickable) cylinder >> cased >> locks (precision, multi-level, pins at a weird locations/angles). > > The best way to make an

Hi, > For example: call void %1608(%"struct.LRT::RGBAucharFrameBuffer"* > %1604) > > How can I resolve the targets of these? Also, why are they appearing as > indirect calls in the IR, when they are direct calls in the source? You don't mention what language you're trying to compile, though it looks plausibly C++. I'd guess these are virtual function calls.

I am coming up against a lot of function pointers in the IR, although the corresponding source code does not have indirect calls. For example: call void %1608(%"struct.LRT::RGBAucharFrameBuffer"* %1604) How can I resolve the targets of these? Also, why are they appearing as indirect calls in the IR, when they are direct calls in the source? Thanks. -Apala

...a server. > > This is terribly bad advice I'm afraid ... https://access.redhat.com/solutions/783533 The legacy network service is a fragile compilation of shell scripts (which is why certain changes like some bonding or tagging alterations require a full system restart or very careful unpicking manually with ip) and is effectively deprecated in RHEL at this time due to major bug fixes only but no feature work. You really should have a read through this as well: https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/8 On EL6 yes NM should be removed on anything but a wifi system but on EL7 unless you fall i...

It seems like you want to use -> and <- as arrows with different meanings to "A gets the value of B" in your package, as a means of writing expressions in your package language. Another possibility would be to use different symbols instead of the problematic -> and <-, for example you could use <.~ and ~.> which are not at all flipped or changed before you get a chance

...orking but we want to add the second office to the system. (Currently 1 office has 10 users and the second office has 1 user connected via VPN ) but the second office will have 20 within 12 months and the first will have 35 soon )) Has anyone done anything like this ? I am currently reading & unpicking http://www.linux-ha.org/ to see what that gives me. Any clues/comments very welcome, even if you think I am mad ! Thanks Denis

Dear Barry, In general, I believe users are already accustomed with the classical arrows "->" and "<-" which are used as such in quoted expressions. But I agree that "-.>" is a very neat trick, thanks a lot. A small dot, what a difference. All the best, Dmitri On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:40?AM Barry Rowlingson < b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:

On Tue, November 28, 2017 9:21 am, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Pete Biggs wrote: >>> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. >> I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. > Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security

Maybe someone has already suggested this, but if your functions accepted strings you could use sub or gsub to replace the -> with a symbol that parsed at the same precedence as <-, say <<-. Then parse it and deal with it. When it is time to display the parsed and perhaps manipulated formulae to the user, deparse it and do the reverse replacement. > encode <-

On 11/28/2017 12:04 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Thanks, Lamar! that is very instructive. You're welcome. > I was always unimpressed with > persistence of attempts to make more secure (less pickable) cylinder cased > locks (precision, multi-level, pins at a weird locations/angles). The best way to make an unpickable lock is to make the tolerances of the pins and the cylinder

I have a time stamp in UTC (GMT) time: > format(ISOdatetime(1970,1,1,0,0,0)+1165398135729/1000,"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%OS3") "2006-12-06 09:42:18.823" (note millisecond accuracy, but not relevant to question here) Now, this time stamp actually "happened" at local (Swedish) time one hour later (10:42). Regarding summer/winter adjustments in time ("spring

These patches (should) give us support for compiling against Ruby 1.9. Roy _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users

Hi Tim, This is C++ indeed. Basically, I am profiling the code. So, these edges that cannot be resolved at compile time present a problem. Where can I find these devirtualization optimizations that you mentioned? Thanks. -Apala On 01/01/2013 12:18 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > > Hi, > > > For example: call void %1608(%"struct.LRT::RGBAucharFrameBuffer"* > > %1604)

...s terribly bad advice I'm afraid ... > > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/783533 > > The legacy network service is a fragile compilation of shell scripts > (which is why certain changes like some bonding or tagging alterations > require a full system restart or very careful unpicking manually with > ip) and is effectively deprecated in RHEL at this time due to major > bug fixes only but no feature work. > > You really should have a read through this as well: > > https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/8 > > On EL6 yes NM should be removed on anything but a wif...

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-1141662977-1014960253=:3119 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID:

...e, but I found it wasn''t necessary to copy the kernel or its modules into the guest; I just loaded it from the host filesystem. The file to use for kernel is the `vmlinux'' from the Linux tree''s toplevel, as sadly the Xen''s loader does not yet support unpicking bzImages. You will need extra=''console=hvc'' root=''/dev/xvda6 ro'' or the equivalent. Since the kernel and especially the initramfs are very large you are likely to have to increase the `memory'' parameter too. I have so far only with `vcpus...

...#39;m afraid ... >> >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/783533 >> >> The legacy network service is a fragile compilation of shell scripts >> (which is why certain changes like some bonding or tagging alterations >> require a full system restart or very careful unpicking manually with >> ip) and is effectively deprecated in RHEL at this time due to major >> bug fixes only but no feature work. >> >> You really should have a read through this as well: >> >> https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/8 >> >> On EL6 yes NM should...

My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there, and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no* change. Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful. My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's fine, and there've been