search for: unpart

Hello my name is Michael I am new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is run the software as a dual boot how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive with 4GB DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300. I would like to setup a shared hosting site I no I need to install php and MySQL as such I also would like to sell domain names when I put in my search bar on my site how can i have it search for

...m new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is run the software as a dual boot how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive with 4GB DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300. I assume you?re setting up dual boot between Windows and CentOS? Its generally easier to install Windows first, then set aside unpartioned space to install CentOS on after the windows install is complete. > I would like to setup a shared hosting site I no I need to install php and MySQL as such I hope not on your dual-boot system ? that?d be kinda an odd idea to have a shared hosting site run on a system that?s occasionally...

I try two ways to use syslinux for USB key (2GB USB key), and one approach can boot from machine, another approach can not. Could you review the following steps and tell me why #2 can not boot? Thanks very much! approach #1 steps: mkfs.vfat -F 16 -n USB /dev/sdb -I (pay attention, it uses "-I" here) syslinux /dev/sdb (pay attention, it is "sdb", not "sdb1" here)

Hi I would like the opinion of you and if anyone has a similar scenario. I have a project for installation of a Asterisk server in a client with about 400 extensions. My question is whether this scenario carry an Asterisk virtualized. Will be used only extensions and trunks sip sip, 1 queue with 2 agents, without call recording. It is best to use XEN or VMware? Which best version of Asterisk for

I have been trying to boot a kernel I compiled. I tried 2 different USB thumb drives. I tried win32 syslinux 3.31 and 3.36 with no luck. I even tried another known good kernel for testing purposes. After syslinux starts I get "Invalid or corrupt kernel image" but I don't think it is even really trying to run it. The last time I built a kernel about 1-1/2 years ago you could put a

Hello If I want to manage a complete disk with btrfs, what''s the "Best Practice"? Would it be best to create the btrfs filesystem on "/dev/sdb", or would it be better to create just one partition from start to end and then do "mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1"? Would the same recomendation hold true, if we''re talking about huge disks, like 4TB or so?