search for: unnoticable

...o, I haven't used blade, lame or xing since RC3 was released. *GRIN* Myles - ogg'ing and flac'ing happily -----Original Message----- From: Greg Wooledge [mailto:greg@wooledge.org] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 08:50 To: vorbis@xiph.org Subject: Re: [vorbis] When will quality increase be unnoticable? <p>Moritz Grimm (gtgbr@gmx.net) wrote: > Your problem is Xing. It's the worst encoder on earth. Second worst, after bladeenc. ;-) -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." greg@wooledge.org | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://...

>> Is bit-peeling going to be real (or just a rumor forever)? > Apparently the RC3 streams are capable of being bit peeled, however the > tool to do so was looking likely to be quite complex. I believe the plan > was to have RC4 produce streams that left better hints for the peeling > tool, so as to make the tool simpler and faster, but I doubt we'll see it > until

...stem. We generally have 4 callers in it: two with the gsm codec and 2 with g729. Initially, the conference works fine and there is little latency. After about 15min., though, the latency is very noticable and by 25min it's unbearable. If we all leave the conference and return, the latency is unnoticable again. The load on the box is minimal, and only our meetme is running most of the time. Checking system load with top shows 0.1 or less. We have no digium hardware and use ztdummy for our timing device. zttest yields results generally in the area of 99.96%, but about 3-4% will be as low as 95%....

I started thinking about this after doing a little testing with AAC, MP3 and Ogg Vorbis. I was comparing the different formats at similiar bitrates. After a while I finally realized that they all sound more or less the same to me. >From 160 kbps on, I usually cannot detect any difference between a lossy encoding and the original source. If LAME is used, I have to strain to notice anything at

...2003 month 04 day 16 language R It appears to my eye that y-axis tick labels are about half a millimetre lower than the tick they label -- at least when using the postscript device with lattice. For large font sizes it's unnoticable, but there are times when a small pointsize is necessary and I have to fudge the positioning. Is that noticed by anyone else? best -- Patrick Connolly HortResearch Mt Albert Auckland New Zealand Ph: +64-9 815 4200 x 7188 ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ I...

...you are unable to make a decent backup at least once a week, your diskspace must be considered to big. Friedrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Per Wigren [mailto:wigren@home.se] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2002 07:37 An: vorbis@xiph.org Betreff: Re: [vorbis] When will quality increase be unnoticable? <p>Friday 21 June 2002 01.33 skrev Øyvind Stegard: > Perhaps I'm just one of those guys who likes to keep too much things > around, or perhaps I simply have too much diskspace =). No, you can NEVER have too much diskspace! :) / Wigren --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.x...

...ased on reverse engineering" > (key is at the top of the page) but the ratings are somewhat > subjective beyond that (some protocols are easier to understand than > others). Ah. The filter/key box doesn't work without javascript (which I have deactivated by default), and it's unnoticable there's something missing. > > On the other hand, if it doesn't work, I might just start trying to > > reverse-engineer the protocol. Sounds like a nice way to get started > > with reverse-engineering :) > > There are some pointers in the list archives (also check...

...stem. We generally have 4 callers in it: two with the gsm codec and 2 with g729. Initially, the conference works fine and there is little latency. After about 15min., though, the latency is very noticable and by 25min it's unbearable. If we all leave the conference and return, the latency is unnoticable again. The load on the box is minimal, and only our meetme is running most of the time. Checking system load with top shows 0.1 or less. We have no digium hardware and use ztdummy for our timing device. zttest yields results generally in the area of 99.96%, but about 3-4% will be as low as 95%....

Does anyone out there have any thoughts on the type of load common DTrace scripts would cause on a system if run 24x7? I know "common DTrace scripts" and their underlining probe calls a vague statement. So for the lack of a common and establish set of scripts in the OS, I''ll use the most popular right for my question...the DTraceToolkit from Brendan Gregg. Which by the

Just as a heads up, I spent days researching this problem before asking, so I hope to not be wasting anyones time. I also asked on the Ubuntu forums with no replies, so I figured it must be a tricky issue that only the creators of Wine can answer. Some info you may want: I recently installed Ubuntu 8.04. It works perfectly fine, including 3D. My computer is a 2.2GHz P4, 768MB of RAM, with a

Hello. I am hoping someone can help with a problem I am having. I am running the Windows folding at home client through wine. This app is very load intensive and performs many scientific calculations. It consumes 100% of all six cores in my system. However, I run it with a "nice" level of 19 so that it only uses idle cycles. Unfortunately, with this setup, my system consistently

So, how does one enable flash video and audio in Firefox-31.4.0esr? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-December/071165.html does anybody have news about dib engine (or AutoCAD)?? thanks

Is there any way of executing a full sql script, and not just one statement? You can do this: ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("insert into batches (name) values ''name''") but not this: ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("insert into batches (name) values ''name''; "insert into batches (name) values

At least it appears that way on my FreeBSD 8.1 system. This is probably unnoticeable in regular use but I happen to use CFengine(v2) for system configuration & monitoring. If it notices dovecot not running it tries to start it and hangs. I believe cfengine (cfagent) has created a pipe to monitor the start commmand's stderr and is waiting for this pipe to close. This never happens

Wayne, I've been ruminating a bit on the qsorted flist and duplicate removal and have an idea. What if we removed end_file_entry() from send_file_name() and instead had a for(i=0; i < flist->count; ++i) send_file_entry(flist->files[i], f, ??) in send_file_list(). As near as i can tell this would be unnoticeable to the protocol. Once done the sort of the file list could be

I have been having a problem with the test releases...I am now using Test 59. When I delete a message using SquirrelMail (IMAP) the message stays in the message list....but you can't open it anymore because it can't be found, if I logout and log back in...the message is gone from the list. I thought it could be a problem with the cache, so I added mail_never_cache_fields = MessagePart

Hi all, This came up in a recent review. There is currently no documented style for how to write error messages. For example, should they start with a capital letter or end in a full stop? Consequently, there's quite a bit of inconsistency in our diagnostics throughout the code base. clang typically emits error messages with no leading capital letter and no trailing full stop. For example:

On Wed, January 21, 2015 14:27, Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:37:43PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> So, how does one enable flash video and audio in Firefox-31.4.0esr? > > One installs the flash plugin from Adobe and configures firefox to > either run it automatically when needed, or to ask if you want > to allow it to run, every time (which helps prevent

Hi, We are building a new system that will support a large number of users (high volume, high concurrent usage, etc).? We have played with Dovecot, but in most serious applications we have traditionally used Courier IMAP.? It's my (lay) understanding that with indexing and perhaps other things in Dovecot, it might perform better than Courier in larger environments like this.? Am I correct or