Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unnecessary_break".
2020 Oct 17
0
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
...!I1e3ICrqVVRM26wDg2unWSH5Oo5ddT0f-H6IkP2Hnb2dQ-YGRtaTKw7R_N1dUf1UUJpFjg$
> for 266 of 485 warnings in this week's linux-next, allyesconfig on x86_64.
Early acks/individual patches by subsystem would be good.
Better still would be an automated cocci script.
The existing checkpatch test for UNNECESSARY_BREAK
has a few too many false positives.
>From a script run on next on July 28th:
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c:266: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return
arch/arm/nwfpe/fpa11_cprt.c:38: WARNING:UNNECESSARY_BREAK: break is not useful after a goto or return
arch...
2020 Oct 17
10
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
early acks.
clang has a number of useful, new warnings see
2020 Oct 17
10
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
early acks.
clang has a number of useful, new warnings see