Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unmaintan".
Did you mean:
maintan
2015 May 26
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.7 release plans
...this yet, but I'm
still optimistic.
- Provide a tarball with the docs and doxygen as part of the release.
- PGP signatures on pre-built binaries: the person who builds the
binary should sign it (unless you think this is too involved).
- Not including Dragonegg in the release; it seems pretty unmaintaned by now.
Please let me know what you think!
Cheers,
Hans
2007 Feb 01
12
[PATCH] HTB O(1) class lookup
This patch changes HTB''s class storage from hash+lists to a two-level linear
array, so it can do constant time (O(1)) class lookup by classid. It improves
scalability for large number of classes.
Without the patch, ~14k htb classes can starve a Xeon-3.2 at only 15kpps,
using most of it''s cycles traversing lists in htb_find(). The patch
eliminates this problem, and has a
2006 Jul 11
0
klibc and what's the next step?
...there is a new way to specify these defaults, its create
this file or script".
While I believe all this root and ramdisk code default selection could
be moved to user space, the list will grow long and complex and will
entail figuring out what the platform is again. It would grow as one
big
unmaintanable hook that every platform will want to update vs the
scaleable if duplicated "the board support file can set the default
boot device" that we have today. Or, we just say "add this option /
config file to your initramfs build" or write a small program to
mimic the conditions....