search for: unlovely

...ract the number I want in one pass? I can see that I can add "begin" to the beginning of the string, and match that and do something similar at the end, getting rid of empty strings etc - but I think it would take about 3 passess - and the files are large. And besides that code would be unlovely. Kind regards, Matt Redding ********************************DISCLAIMER**************...{{dropped:15}}

If I remember correctly, every time the dreaded "_" arises as an assignment operator in polite emails, the advantage of last resort cited in its defence is that it is only a single (albeit shifted) keystroke. I can only speak for the excellent NEdit, but it is a trivial task to assign some otherwise unloved key (my favorite is that funny accent at the left of the digit row) to

Hi all! I've been working with openldap for many many years and I have found very usefull to turn debuging all the way on with loglevel -1 in slapd.conf to be able to inspect in the log the queries being sent to the server. I am now using samba 4.10.8 as a DC and a general purpose LDAP server and I havent found how to debug the queries that the server receives to try and figure out what might

On 4/24/2013 8:05 PM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > > Everything. This includes all of the custom lowering code for all of the > targets, all of dagcombine, and maybe all of the patterns in the TD files. I may have missed the discussion, but why are we trying to move away from the SelectionDAG? Are there specific problems that we don't want to fix or live with? If so, what are they?

> The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless > you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: > The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. We just need to set an IP address, subnet mask, gateway, and DNS servers and we will never be changing that configuration ever

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/24/2013 8:05 PM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > >> >> Everything. This includes all of the custom lowering code for all of the >> targets, all of dagcombine, and maybe all of the patterns in the TD files. >> > > I may have missed the discussion, but why are we trying to

On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > One question : > > "In the spirit of the (long-term) intent to migrate away from the > SelectionDAG framework" > > .. is this meant in general or just in respect to legalization? Everything. This includes all of the custom lowering code for all of the targets, all of dagcombine, and maybe

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46533 Bug #: 46533 Summary: Firefox WebGL with Nouveau 3D; user claims it came installed by default on OpenSuse 12.1 Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network > "managed" by Networkmanager. You're opting to have your network managed by a bunch of unloved legacy scripts that you're advised to avoid using unless necessary, or you've having it managed by NetworkManager. If you want to have it managing it

On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 13:19 +0000, David Wells via samba wrote: > Hi all! > > I've been working with openldap for many many years and I have found > very usefull to turn debuging all the way on with loglevel -1 in > slapd.conf to be able to inspect in the log the queries being sent to > the server. I am now using samba 4.10.8 as a DC and a general purpose > LDAP server

Dear Sir, Thank-you for your message. I shall not be reading Yahoo Mail for quite some time. You should presume that your message remains unloved and unread. ** If you know who I am (in other words you are not a Bulk Emailer), then you already know how to contact me either on my _normal_ EMail address, or on the telephone. Yours faithfully.

virt-ls has felt a little unloved for a long time. With this patch series, it turns into quite a useful tool for doing forensics and monitoring of VMs, and looking for changes to files. I have added the 'virt-ls -lR' output mode (the combination of -l and -R was previously unused). In this mode you get a recursive list of files and directories, with extra stat information and optionally

On 08/03/17 10:15, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their >> network >> "managed" by Networkmanager. > > You're opting to have your network managed by a bunch of unloved legacy > scripts that you're advised to avoid using unless necessary, or

Dear all, It's been a while since I have started to look at the code for Souffleur that was dropped a couple of years ago by its former maintainer. I have now a few patches that I would like to be committed to the trunk of this project if approved. I am sorry if the modifications are not aligned with the project's main purpose but I had no one to talk to about its main goal.

Dustin Laurence wrote: > On 01/07/2010 06:03 PM, Alastair Lynn wrote: > >> You'll probably need to use insertvalue to construct your return value. >> > > Ah ha! > > The fact is I didn't really understand the significance of this part > when I read it, and so didn't remember it when I needed it. OK, so I > have tested it and I can now build

On 01/07/2010 06:03 PM, Alastair Lynn wrote: > > You'll probably need to use insertvalue to construct your return value. Ah ha! The fact is I didn't really understand the significance of this part when I read it, and so didn't remember it when I needed it. OK, so I have tested it and I can now build up a struct like this %s1 = insertvalue {i32, i32} {i32 0, i32 0}, i32

Hi everyone, I have been studing the VM code in order to come with a better implementation of my fix for large pages usage on GK20A (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/3/375 ). Following some older threads about this code (http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=137618326022935 ) also left me kind of puzzled, and I wonder if we could not simplify and improve things there. It seems like arbitrary

...gh the high portion will be discarded) in order to preserve semantics in the uninteresting case that iq - (ip + i) > 0xFFFFFFFFU. Now imagine a target without a 64- bit divider. :) I guess each intermediate result could be cast back to a pointer and then back to an integer, but that seems unlovely. On 2008-05-07, at 08:25, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > Meaning: on a machine having 32-bit registers, iWord is a type > treated by the IR as indistinguishable from i32. On a machine having > 64 bit registers, iWord is the a type treated by the IR as > indistinguishable from i64...

On Wed, 7 May 2008, Gordon Henriksen wrote: >> What would this be used for? How is it defined? How does >> arithmetic work on it? > > Looking up the intptr type via TargetData is not a significant issue > for me, but I can see the appeal, and how its absence could constitute > a significant barrier to generating portable IR (provided, of course, > a portable language).

On 2008-05-07, at 03:05, Chris Lattner wrote: > On May 6, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > >> There are other languages that specify a "word" type along these >> lines. Would it be worth considering adding such a type to the IR, >> or is there a reason not to do so that I am failing to see? > > What would this be used for? How is it