search for: unlock_mutex

...loc_slot); + goto unlock_nfs_sync; + } + + mutex_lock(&inode_alloc_inode->i_mutex); + status = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode_alloc_inode, &alloc_bh, 0); + if (status < 0) { + mlog(ML_ERROR, "lock on alloc inode on slot %u failed %d\n", + (u32)suballoc_slot, status); + goto unlock_mutex; + } + status = ocfs2_test_suballoc_bit(osb, inode_alloc_inode, alloc_bh, + blkno, suballoc_bit, &set); + if (status < 0) { + mlog(ML_ERROR, "test suballoc bit failed %d\n", status); + goto inode_unlock; + } + /* allocate bit is clear, inode is a stale inode */ + if (!set) {...

...2) Error: test_create(ProductTest): NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occured while evaluating nil.- /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.2/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:112:in `unlock_mutex'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.2/lib/active_record/fixtures.rb:534:in `teardown'' 1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 2 errors ----- I had already created all relevant text fixtures and had already modiefied my product_test.rb file prior to running thi...

Hi! I got a class named EinsatzFilter which I serialized to session. Before saving to session it works afterwards I keep getting the message: "undefined method `to_s'' for #<Person:0x38c6ab8>". "Person" is a from ActiveRecord::Base inherited class. Code: class EinsatzFilter include ApplicationHelper attr_reader :personen, :monat, :projekte, :kunde

...h_empty_attributes(ActiveUserMetricTest): NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occured while evaluating nil.- c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:112:in `unlock_mutex'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/fixtures.rb:534:in `teardown'' 1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 2 errors What should I do to solve this problem? Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Justin -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~...

...' 2) Error: test_truth(OrderTest): NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occured while evaluating nil.- c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.13.2/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:112:in `unlock_mutex'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.13.2/lib/active_record/fixtures.rb:509:in `teardown'' 1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 2 errors ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8. Worse still, none of the d...

Hi all In another thread I complain about an error I get after trying to get Globalize working. http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/51988#new Now I want to ask you, if anybody of you has ever got Globalize working? I have done exactly what''s written in the (absolutely much too short) tutorial of its wiki... http://globalize.diluvia.net/wiki ...and I''m very frustrated that no

Is anybody testing mongrel on ruby 1.9. I just tried installing mongrel on trunk 1.9 and trunk rubygems and got this error compiling fastthread: /Users/stephen/dev/ruby/1.9_trunk/bin/ruby extconf.rb install mongrel --no-rdoc creating Makefile make gcc -I. -I/Users/stephen/dev/ruby/1.9_trunk/include/ruby-1.9/i686-darwin8.10.1 -I/Users/stephen/dev/ruby/1.9_trunk/include/ruby-1.9 -I.

...atisfy - the following three requirements: - - 1. Do not copy more bytes than are stored in the buffer. - 2. Do not copy more bytes than the reqested data size. - 3. Do not run off the end of the buffer. */ write_amount = compute_dequeue_size(buf, nbytes); UNLOCK_MUTEX(buf->mutex); -------------- next part -------------- diff -urN -X diff.ignore ogg123.orig/ogg123.c ogg123/ogg123.c --- ogg123.orig/ogg123.c Sat Oct 5 14:44:04 2002 +++ ogg123/ogg123.c Sat Oct 5 14:58:50 2002 @@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ { int option_index; char **playlist_array; - int items;...

Hi Sanjoy, Yes, that's exactly what we have been looking at recently here, but the region tags seem to make it possible to express the control flow as well, so I think we could start with reg ions+metadata, as Hal and Xinmin proposed, and then figure out what needs to be first class instructions. --Vikram Adve > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at