search for: unlock_device_hotplug

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 25 matches for "unlock_device_hotplug".

Did you mean: lock_device_hotplug
2020 Sep 08
0
[PATCH v2 3/7] mm/memory_hotplug: prepare passing flags to add_memory() and friends
...n/balloon.c @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void) mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex); /* add_memory_resource() requires the device_hotplug lock */ lock_device_hotplug(); - rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource); + rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, 0); unlock_device_hotplug(); mutex_lock(&balloon_mutex); diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h index 51a877fec8da8..5cd48332ce119 100644 --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h @@ -345,11 +345,13 @@ extern void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *...
2020 Sep 10
0
[PATCH v3 3/7] mm/memory_hotplug: prepare passing flags to add_memory() and friends
...on.c @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void) mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex); /* add_memory_resource() requires the device_hotplug lock */ lock_device_hotplug(); - rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource); + rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, MHP_NONE); unlock_device_hotplug(); mutex_lock(&balloon_mutex); diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h index 51a877fec8da8..e53d1058f3443 100644 --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ enum { MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE, }; +/* Flags fo...
2020 Sep 08
0
[PATCH v2 6/7] xen/balloon: try to merge system ram resources
...+331,7 @@ static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void) mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex); /* add_memory_resource() requires the device_hotplug lock */ lock_device_hotplug(); - rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, 0); + rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE); unlock_device_hotplug(); mutex_lock(&balloon_mutex); -- 2.26.2
2019 Sep 19
0
[PATCH RFC v3 8/9] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
...>dev); + /* Ignore if the device is already offline. */ + if (rc > 0) + rc = 0; + + /* + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it. + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime. + */ + if (!rc && try_remove_memory(nid, start, size)) + BUG(); + unlock_device_hotplug(); + + return rc; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory); #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */ -- 2.21.0
2020 Mar 02
0
[PATCH v1 08/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
...Ignore if the device is already offline. */ + if (rc > 0) + rc = 0; + + /* + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it. + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime. + */ + if (!rc) { + rc = try_remove_memory(nid, start, size); + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc); + } + unlock_device_hotplug(); + + return rc; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory); #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */ -- 2.24.1
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH v2 07/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
...Ignore if the device is already offline. */ + if (rc > 0) + rc = 0; + + /* + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it. + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime. + */ + if (!rc) { + rc = try_remove_memory(nid, start, size); + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc); + } + unlock_device_hotplug(); + + return rc; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory); #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */ -- 2.24.1
2020 Sep 08
14
[PATCH v2 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Sep 08
14
[PATCH v2 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 May 07
0
[PATCH v3 07/15] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
...Ignore if the device is already offline. */ + if (rc > 0) + rc = 0; + + /* + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it. + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime. + */ + if (!rc) { + rc = try_remove_memory(nid, start, size); + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc); + } + unlock_device_hotplug(); + + return rc; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory); #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */ -- 2.25.3
2020 Apr 30
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Allow to not create firmware memmap entries
This is the follow up of [1]: [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Make virtio-mem play nicely with kexec-tools I realized that this is not only helpful for virtio-mem, but also for dax/kmem - it's a fix for that use case (see patch #3) of persistent memory. Also, while testing, I discovered that kexec-tools will *not* add dax/kmem memory (anything not directly under the root when parsing
2020 May 07
3
[PATCH v3 07/15] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
...t; 0) > + rc = 0; > + > + /* > + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it. > + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime. > + */ > + if (!rc) { > + rc = try_remove_memory(nid, start, size); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc); > + } > + unlock_device_hotplug(); > + > + return rc; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory); > #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */ > -- > 2.25.3
2020 May 07
3
[PATCH v3 07/15] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
...t; 0) > + rc = 0; > + > + /* > + * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it. > + * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime. > + */ > + if (!rc) { > + rc = try_remove_memory(nid, start, size); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(rc); > + } > + unlock_device_hotplug(); > + > + return rc; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory); > #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */ > -- > 2.25.3
2020 Apr 29
4
[PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Make virtio-mem play nicely with kexec-tools
This series is based on [1]: [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory That will hopefull get picked up soon, rebased to -next. The following patches were reverted from -next [2]: [PATCH 0/3] kexec/memory_hotplug: Prevent removal and accidental use As discussed in that thread, they should be reverted from -next already. In theory, if people agree, we could take the first two patches
2020 Sep 10
9
[PATCH v3 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Sep 11
13
[PATCH v4 0/8] selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 Sep 11
13
[PATCH v4 0/8] selective merging of system ram resources
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where
2020 May 07
20
[PATCH v3 00/15] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory
This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v3 Patch #1 - #10 where contained in v2 and only contain minor modifications (mostly smaller fixes). The remaining patches are new and contain smaller optimizations. Details about virtio-mem can be found in the cover letter of v2 [1]. A basic QEMU implementation was
2020 May 07
20
[PATCH v3 00/15] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory
This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v3 Patch #1 - #10 where contained in v2 and only contain minor modifications (mostly smaller fixes). The remaining patches are new and contain smaller optimizations. Details about virtio-mem can be found in the cover letter of v2 [1]. A basic QEMU implementation was
2020 Mar 02
20
[PATCH v1 00/11] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory
This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v1 The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible, cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution that avoids many limitations imposed by existing technologies, architectures, and interfaces. More details can be found below and in linked material. It's
2020 Mar 02
20
[PATCH v1 00/11] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory
This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-v1 The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible, cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution that avoids many limitations imposed by existing technologies, architectures, and interfaces. More details can be found below and in linked material. It's