search for: unloaded

>From Hadley's C best practices (http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/src.html#c-best-practices): > Like with C++, whenever you use C code in your package, you should unload the DLL when the package is unloaded: .onUnload <- function (libpath) { library.dynam.unload("mypackage", libpath) } Writing R Extensions on the other hand doesn't even mention this (AFAIK). I can see how it would be polite to unload the dlls, but doing so seems to cause some weird problems for me with...

I have a package that I'm developing that I need to unload the library. Long story short I figured out that the leaving the compiled code loaded lead to a segmentation fault, but unloading the code will fix it. I've read the documentation and it appears that there are several ways to do this? What is the popper accepted current standard for unloading compiled code? The options as I

configure.ac | 1 dev/null |binary test/Makefile.am | 2 test/custom/.gitignore | 2 test/custom/Makefile.am | 85 +++ test/custom/button-events-button-5.swf |binary

Hello, I have a package with a namespace. Because I use Roxygen that overwrites the NAMESPACE file each time it is run, I use a R/zzz.R file with an .onLoad() and .onUnload() functions to take care of loading and unloading my shared library. The problem: if I load my library from a local directory, then the unloading of the package fails, e.g: # loads fine >library(Foo,

Hi All, I'm still actively researching this problem (reading R-ext manual), but I hoped that I might be able to get some additional insight from the list given that I'm fairly new at writing R extension code. Problem: I have some fairly simple code (.Call interface) that makes a call to another shared library, which, in turn, calls routines in an HDF5 shared library. The good news

Dear R-devel friends: I'm back to bother you again about the conflict between mclapply and tcltk. I've been monitoring several packages that want to use mclapply to parallelize computations and need to figure out what should be done. It appears tcltk cannot be safely unloaded, so the best we can do is check for the presence of tcltk and stop if it is found before mclapply() is used. I wish you would please review my suggestion below. Maybe checkForTcltk() could be used in the parallel package. Otherwise, we are letting people run with scissors. There's a warning...

Hello, Not sure if this is the right forum: I''m encountering difficulties with o2ib which prevents an LNET shutdown from proceeding: Unloading OpenIB kernel modules:NET: Unregistered protocal family 27 Failed to unload rdma_cm Failed to unload rdma_cm Failed to unload ib_cm Failed to unload ib_sa LustreError: 131-3: Received notification of device removal Please shutdown LNET

Second iteration of my endeavour to rid nouveau, radeon and amdgpu of runtime pm ref leaks. Patches 1 to 8 are identical to v1. Patch 9 of v1 modified the DRM core to turn off all CRTCs on driver unload. Based on feedback by Daniel Vetter, I've replaced this with a helper to turn off all CRTCs, which is called by nouveau, radeon and amdgpu on unload. In other words, this is now opt-in. So

On 11/21/2017 03:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This works OK on x86_64, but fails on our fast new Amberwing (aarch64) > machine. I've attached the test-suite.log file, but I'm not very sure > what's going wrong from that. > I'll see what I can spot... > FAIL: test-parallel-file.sh > =========================== > > read 1/1 bytes at offset 0 > 1

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > On reason for hitting the MAX_NUM_DLLS (= 100) limit is because some > packages don't unload their DLLs when they being unloaded themselves. I am surprised by this. Why does R not do this automatically? What is the case for keeping the DLL loaded after the package has been unloaded? What happens if you reload another version of the same package from a different library after unloading?

Thanks, Tomas, Luke, for the clarifications. Then, I have another question. But first, let me introduce how I ended up here, because obviously I just don't go around dyn.unloading things that I've just compiled. I was testing a package with valgrind. Everything ok, no leaks. Great. But I'm always suspicious (probably unjustifiably) of all the memory that is reported as "still

This works OK on x86_64, but fails on our fast new Amberwing (aarch64) machine. I've attached the test-suite.log file, but I'm not very sure what's going wrong from that. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to

Hi, I am trying to trace some functions that are executed at detach time, and it seems that just having dtrace around to instrument the module is causing a short circuit, whereas modunload will return (device busy). I understand that this makes sense, but how can I get around this if I want to trace stuff at detach time? Thanks, --S

Good question Rolf. Rui, thanks for pointing out dyn.unload. When I started using Rcpp a couple of years ago I got burned by stale .so enough times that I adopted a policy of recompile-then-start new R session. My workflow does not include Rolf's "brazillion" repeats, so the overhead of this approach has not been too painful. The documentation for dyn.unload (via ?dyn.unload)

Hi, In what Asterisk file can I edit for me to temporarily unload such modules. But later I woudl still be able to load them. Thanks Angel ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi folks, I've already searched the mailing list but no one else seems to have my same problem. I'm using Asterisk with the following configuration: Fedora Core 4 (but I also tried Fedora 3) 1 Digium TE110P 1 TDM40B 1 HFC-S 'Cologne' bristuff 0.2.0-RC8o (zaptel 1.0.9.2) I compiled right, I can load kernel modules but when I try to unload wcte11xp module (the one

Otherwise 'modprobe -r' on a module having a dependency on bridge will implicitly unload bridge, bringing down all connectivity that was using bridges. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> net/bridge/br_if.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.23-rc8/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-09-26 09:23:54.000000000 +0200 +++

If one wants to unload compiled code for a package containing a namespace, my understanding is that .onUnload() should be used, with a call to library.dynam.unload(). This is used in e.g., the stats and methods packages, but it appears to me that the compiled code is not being unloaded when the package is detached(). Am I misunderstanding something? Best, Jim > search() [1] ".GlobalEnv" "package:methods" "package:stats" "package:graphics" [5] "package:grDevices" "package:utils" "package:datas...

If have a couple patches I found while looking at a panic I was seeing while unloading the nouveau module. Unloading the nouveau module on my optimus notebook machine causes the system to panic. This started occuring when moving from 4.4 to 4.14. These patches make it such that the system does not panic when unloading the module. 4.14 also requires commit 34112bf4935d ("drm/nouveau/fbcon:

...s with > finalizers might still exist (created by R_RegisterCFinalizer etc). > Even if there are no live references to such objects (which would be > hard to verify), it still wouldn't be safe to unload the DLL until a > full garbage collection has been done. > > If the DLL is unloaded, then the function pointer that was registered > now becomes a pointer into the memory where the DLL was, leading to an > almost certain crash when such objects get garbage collected. Very good point. Does base::gc() perform such a *full* garbage collection and thereby trigger all remaining...