search for: unlicense

I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics Resident Fellow, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota charlie at stat.umn.edu

...nest request for information. As for me, I've never heard of this license, but if CRAN doesn't have an option to license software in the public domain, then I would support the inclusion of some such option. FWIW, searching for "public domain software license" on Google turns up unlicense.org as the second result. Frederick On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 07:19:47PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 13/01/2017 3:21 PM, Charles Geyer wrote: > > I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R > > licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? > > >...

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/01/2017 3:21 PM, Charles Geyer wrote: >> >> I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R >> licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? >> > > That's a question for you to answer, not to ask. Who besides you thinks > that it's a good license for open source software? > > If it is recognized by the OSF or FSF...

...rhaps you aim for License: Unlimited Best, Uwe Ligges On 14.01.2017 07:53, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 13/01/2017 3:21 PM, Charles Geyer wrote: >>> >>> I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R >>> licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? >>> >> >> That's a question for you to answer, not to ask. Who besides you thinks >> that it's a good license for open source software? >> >> If it is r...

The Free Software Foundation maintains a list of free and GPL-compatible software licenses here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Unlicense It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for the public domain. On Tue,...

...On 14.01.2017 07:53, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Duncan Murdoch >> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 13/01/2017 3:21 PM, Charles Geyer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R >>>> licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? >>>> >>> >>> That's a question for you to answer, not to ask. Who besides you thinks >>> that it's a good license for open source software? >>...

...rkar wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Duncan Murdoch >>> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 13/01/2017 3:21 PM, Charles Geyer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R >>>>> licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's a question for you to answer, not to ask. Who besides you thinks >>>> that it's a good license for open sourc...

...Duncan Murdoch >>>> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 13/01/2017 3:21 PM, Charles Geyer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R >>>>>> licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's a question for you to answer, not to ask. Who besides you >>>>> thinks >>>>> th...

On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote: > It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible > license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is > indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be > the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for > the public domain. I'd second...

...RL: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode FOSS: yes in the R license db ... -k > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Brian G. Peterson <brian at braverock.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote: >>> It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible >>> license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is >>> indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be >>> the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for >>> the...

Hi: How to install and set up my asterisk server with G723 codec to send and receive calls using it. Thanks in advance; Wassim _________________________________________________________________ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE

...bool check_remainder(uint32 x) { return x%d==r; } if we know d and r at compile time, and d is an odd integer, we can use modular multiplicative inverse to bypass the division operation. I wrote the following code to calculate the M.M.I of a number over 2^b. I give anyone the permission to use it (unlicensed). uint64_t find_mod_mul_inverse(uint64_t x, uint64_t bits) { if (bits > 64 || ((x&1)==0)) return 0;// invalid parameters uint64_t mask; if (bits == 64) mask = -1; else { mask = 1; mask&l...

...onf file, i get the following: ERROR[3495]: app_cepstral.c:197 cepstral_speak: Failed to set voice. I have not touched swift.conf (i'm using the defaults), and, i should add that i have not yet purchased the cepstral voices so that when i run from the command line it sticks "this voice is unlicensed..." or something like that at the beginning of the file, if that makes some kind of difference. I found the problem referenced here: http://www.cepstral.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56&sid=baa6669e9958920393c62510caa47123&PHPSESSID=df1bcc629c4b8b37617d2d72c8b0232e but no solution... an...

I've compiled all the e-mails between me & MPEG-LA, along with an explanation and some major conclusions, here: http://www.librevideo.org/blog/2010/06/14/mpeg-la-answers-some-questions-about-avch-264-licensing/ Comments welcome, discussion even more so (preferably some of that on the site, too...). -- *Basil Mohamed Gohar* abu_hurayrah at hidayahonline.org

...versions of Tinc, you will probably need to trim it of my extensions for my network. It probably _contains_ bugs I still did not found, and I am not a pro in cryptography (albeit having some experience with in past). This work is currently (my own code) is licensed under GPLv2 only. I will happily unlicense it (making it public domain) if it will go into any versions of Tinc, just with mentioning my contribution in THANKS file. If not, it will stay as is. With best wishes! P.S. I found Tinc a great code inside when I developed extension for it. I was able to quickly understand configuration and requ...

Ok, sorry for the response on the same thread. This is a new one. The main thing is that with this I set the Store Procedure or Query directly on the dialplan line, is easier to configure, change, manage, etc. I also know that works great with heavy load, and it reconnects when the network goes down and up. Can you help me porting this app? I think woun`t be difficult for someone that

...r commercial codec and using it for interoperability with hardware devices (you purchased) is allowed by law. Damn, we even have a law that don't allow bittorrent trackers, as bittorrent file is considered breaking copyright law.. Ironic :p > > >> Please do NOT discuss ways to use unlicensed codecs on this list or any other forum >> provided by Digium. This has been discussed multiple times as to why not, >> and I don't feel like rehashing the argument again. > > I did not know you were a moderator on this list. > >> contributory infringement > >...

...ter doing *CLI> show cepstral female voices Available Cepstral voices: Name Gender Age Language Sample Rate License ========== ========= ===== ==================== ============= ============ Amy female 30 US English 16000Hz unlicensed I see that Amy's voice shows up but when I tried to get cepstral to speak from extensions.conf I get the failed to load library messages shown below. Google searches didn't turn up anything useful yet. Has anyone had this problem before or does someone know what is wrong? This is the line...

...owner. He or she is an independent contractor, working under the supervision of a broker, or brokerage firm. Income for sales agents comes from commission on the sales or rentals of properties. Agents are governed by a state licensing board and are held to a higher standard of doing business than unlicensed individuals. On the plus side, agents do have early knowledge and complete details about new listings and their experience gives them valuable insights into the local real estate market. To get a license you must be at least age 18 or older, successfully complete 60 classroom hours of specialized...

...t; probably need to trim it of my extensions for my network. It probably > _contains_ bugs I still did not found, and I am not a pro in > cryptography (albeit having some experience with in past). > > This work is currently (my own code) is licensed under GPLv2 only. I > will happily unlicense it (making it public domain) if it will go into > any versions of Tinc, just with mentioning my contribution in THANKS > file. If not, it will stay as is. > > With best wishes! > > P.S. I found Tinc a great code inside when I developed extension for > it. I was able to quickly...