Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unknownenvironment".
2014 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PATCH] triples for baremetal
Hi Jonathan,
This looks a bit odd. Any reason for the unknown->none conflating in
this way? For most (all) of the ports unknown-elf works the same as
none-elf. I'm also not sure if someone decided to have,
arm-codesourcery-elf that this would still work with the patch.
Thoughts?
-eric
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
2014 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] triples for baremetal
..._ABI_APCS;
Index: unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (revision 211122)
+++ unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (working copy)
@@ -123,12 +123,6 @@
EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownOS, T.getOS());
EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownEnvironment, T.getEnvironment());
- T = Triple("arm-none-none-eabi");
- EXPECT_EQ(Triple::arm, T.getArch());
- EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownVendor, T.getVendor());
- EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownOS, T.getOS());
- EXPECT_EQ(Triple::EABI, T.getEnvironment());
-
T = Triple("huh");
EXPECT_...
2014 Jun 17
4
[LLVMdev] triples for baremetal
[+llvmdev, -llvm-dev]
(Oopsies, llvmdev doesn't have a hyphen in it like all the others do)
On 6/17/14, 10:45 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
> [+llvm-dev, cfe-dev]
>
> Was "Re: [PATCH] ARM: allow inline atomics on Cortex M"
>
> On 6/17/14, 10:42 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/14, 9:35 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
>>> On 17 June 2014