search for: unknownenviron

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unknownenviron".

2014 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PATCH] triples for baremetal
Hi Jonathan, This looks a bit odd. Any reason for the unknown->none conflating in this way? For most (all) of the ports unknown-elf works the same as none-elf. I'm also not sure if someone decided to have, arm-codesourcery-elf that this would still work with the patch. Thoughts? -eric On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jon,
2014 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] triples for baremetal
..._ABI_APCS; Index: unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp =================================================================== --- unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (revision 211122) +++ unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (working copy) @@ -123,12 +123,6 @@ EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownOS, T.getOS()); EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownEnvironment, T.getEnvironment()); - T = Triple("arm-none-none-eabi"); - EXPECT_EQ(Triple::arm, T.getArch()); - EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownVendor, T.getVendor()); - EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownOS, T.getOS()); - EXPECT_EQ(Triple::EABI, T.getEnvironment()); - T = Triple("huh"); EXP...
2014 Jun 17
4
[LLVMdev] triples for baremetal
[+llvmdev, -llvm-dev] (Oopsies, llvmdev doesn't have a hyphen in it like all the others do) On 6/17/14, 10:45 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > [+llvm-dev, cfe-dev] > > Was "Re: [PATCH] ARM: allow inline atomics on Cortex M" > > On 6/17/14, 10:42 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: >> >> >> On 6/17/14, 9:35 AM, Renato Golin wrote: >>> On 17 June 2014