search for: unixids

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: nome cognome [mailto:digiland_oohay@yahoo.it] Gesendet: 17 September 2003 09:30 An: Brian Reichholf Betreff: Re: [Samba] smbadduser problem ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Reichholf" <brian.reichholf@login.co.at> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: [Samba] smbadduser problem

Thanks fort he advice John, i read that on the link that nome sent. I filled it out in the smb.conf, and edited the usermap file, then restarted the smb server, and it didn't work *shrugs* it works fine with ftp, so that'll do for now. Thanks anyway. Cheers, -brian -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht@samba.org] Gesendet: 17 September 2003 15:04 An: Brian

Seems that each system is making up it own id's. Both the centos and fedora systems have the same idmap settings. idmap uid = 3000000-4000000 idmap gid = 3000000-4000000 samba 3.5.5 winbind and nss on fedora 13 workstation uid=3000000(jonnt) gid=3000004(domain users) groups=3000004(domain users),3000005(domain admins),3000006(denied rodc password replication

On 2015-11-08 at 20:34 +0100, buhorojo wrote: > On 07/11/15 19:57, Michael Adam wrote: > >On 2015-11-07 at 17:47 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > >>On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: > >>>Also, for all I know, the DC always has local unix user and group > >>>IDs, and does NOT use the rfc2307 attributes for this.

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:37:17 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > For the 'DOMAIN' domain you can use several different backends > > (rid, ad etc) but I wouldn't use the tdb backend, how are you going > > to be sure you will get the same IDs

On 2015-11-07 at 17:47 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: > > > > Also, for all I know, the DC always has local unix user and group > > IDs, and does NOT use the rfc2307 attributes for this. (Unless > > this has changed recently, but I can't imagine how.) So there is > > nothing wrong with

On 07/11/15 19:57, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-07 at 17:47 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: >> On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: >>> Also, for all I know, the DC always has local unix user and group >>> IDs, and does NOT use the rfc2307 attributes for this. (Unless >>> this has changed recently, but I can't imagine

On 08/11/15 21:01, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-08 at 20:34 +0100, buhorojo wrote: >> On 07/11/15 19:57, Michael Adam wrote: >>> On 2015-11-07 at 17:47 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: >>>> On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: >>>>> Also, for all I know, the DC always has local unix user and group

I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know where to fix it. It appears that scanning the users.map file strips out the apostrophes and the Windows ID never matches: [2004/06/01 16:23:51, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(521) user_in_list: checking user o'brienta in list [2004/06/01 16:23:51, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(525) user_in_list: checking user

> -----Original Message----- > From: EXT-Auleta, Michael [mailto:michael.auleta@boeing.com] > I think I've narrowed down my problem, but I still don't know > where to fix it. It appears that scanning the > users.map file strips out the apostrophes and the Windows ID > never matches: > The entry in the users.map file is: > > unixid = o'brienta > >

We tried that also. It didn't work either. But since I was pointed to bug 1221, I removed the matching of an apostrophe in util_str.c (fell back to 2.2 behaviour) and that looks like it works. My user is able to map his shares again. Thanks for all who helped. Mike -----Original Message----- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:23 PM To:

...655975-2769631473-500 to uid With other accounts I don't see that error. In the log.winbindd (log level = 10) on the member I see this: [2017/11/14 20:14:36.631151, 1, pid=2654, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=rpc_parse] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:471(ndr_print_function_debug) wbint_Sids2UnixIDs: struct wbint_Sids2UnixIDs out: struct wbint_Sids2UnixIDs ids : * ids: struct wbint_TransIDArray num_ids : 0x00000001 (1) ids: ARRAY(1) ids: struct w...

...tes, there would be no need > to use sssd or nlscd. It should not be too big a problem to use the homedir etc attribs in principle. I think we could and (should) do that. At least controlled by a config option (possibly the same as above). But the biggest problem I see is the creation of the unixIDs: I do not see how this can be reliably done, at least in a multi-DC environment. And for sure not in a heterogenious one (with Samba and Windows DCs): Assume that we change the DC to only use the rfc UIDs so that the fallback to idmap.ldb described above is not done. (I think this is the only re...

Hi, I'm migrating a samba3-server that is used both as a NT4-DC and a filesver into a pair of samba4 servers, one should become the new AD-DC and the other one should be the new fileserver. The new AD-DC seems to work fine. I created all local unix users and unix groups on the new AD-DC before I started the classic upgrade and deleted all of them after the update was finished. That way the

On 2015-11-07 at 12:37 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 07/11/15 11:31, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > >On 7 November 2015 at 10:11, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > >>Is it possible that sssd is failing? > >>What do you have in /etc/nsswitch? > ># cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | egrep "(passwd|group)" > >passwd: files sss >

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:55:58 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > And, yes the smb.conf manpage does say this: > > > > These are suitable for use in the default idmap configuration. > > > > and refer to tdb,tdb2 and ldap. I wouldn't use

...With other accounts I don't see that error. > > In the log.winbindd (log level = 10) on the member I see this: > > [2017/11/14 20:14:36.631151, 1, pid=2654, effective(0, 0), real(0, > 0), class=rpc_parse] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:471(ndr_print_function_debug) > wbint_Sids2UnixIDs: struct wbint_Sids2UnixIDs > out: struct wbint_Sids2UnixIDs > ids : * > ids: struct wbint_TransIDArray > num_ids : 0x00000001 (1) > ids: ARRAY(1) >...

It's very possible. I've put the suggested changes in place and recompiled on a test box, but my user is out of the office today and can't test it so I'll have to wait for hte weekend to pass. Thenks for the info. Mike -----Original Message----- From: mrojava4@eastgranby.k12.ct.us [mailto:mrojava4@eastgranby.k12.ct.us] Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 5:10 PM To: EXT-Auleta,

On both Samba 4.5.1 member server and Samba 3.6.25 member server I tried the following command wbinfo –set-uid-mapping=35049,S-1-5-21-xx-xx-xxx-xxx this should have created a mapping entry consistent with the one on the domain controller for a trusted user But I got the following error failed to call wbcSetUidMapping: WBC_ERR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED As far as I can tell from network

...ss=winbind] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_ads.c:61(ads_cached_connection_reuse) Current tickets expire in 35972 seconds (at 1420487480, time is now 1420451508) [2015/01/05 10:51:48.579085, 10, pid=18923, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=idmap] ../source3/winbindd/idmap_ad.c:452(idmap_ad_sids_to_unixids) Filter: [(&(|(sAMAccountType=805306368)(sAMAccountType=805306369)(sAMAccountType=805306370)(sAMAccountType=268435456)(sAMAccountType=536870912))(|(objectSid=\01\05\00\00\00\00\00\05\15\00\00\00\AD\A7\D8\C3\A75a\80a<\EF\1A\80\04\00\00)))] [2015/01/05 10:51:48.579963, 5, pid=18923, effect...