search for: unixdom

I wanted to bring attention to some odd behavior which I don't believe is intentional. With Samba running, I can go to a Windows machine on the network (10.0.0.0/24) and see all of the Samba shares by pulling up an Explorer window and going to \\Server1 Everything appears to work as expected. However, if I populate the 'hosts allow' parameter within smb.conf as follows: hosts allow

...e! [2013/07/04 00:15:52, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2013/07/04 00:16:03, 0] ../source4/lib/socket/access.c:356(socket_check_access) socket_check_access: Denied connection to 'smbd' from LOCAL/unixdom (LOCAL/unixdom) [2013/07/04 00:16:03, 0] ../source4/lib/socket/access.c:356(socket_check_access) socket_check_access: Denied connection to 'smbd' from LOCAL/unixdom (LOCAL/unixdom) [2013/07/04 00:16:03, 0] ../source4/lib/socket/access.c:356(socket_check_access) socket_check_access: De...

...nhibit = yes server services = s3fs rpc wrepl ldap cldap kdc drepl winbind ntp_signd kcc dnsupdate dns security = auto idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes interfaces = 192.168.3.3/24 127.255.255.255/8 bind interfaces only = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1 LOCAL/unixdom dns forwarder = 127.0.0.2 I've already tried adding: lanman auth = Yes client lanman auth = Yes but that didn't change anything.

...es = s3fs rpc wrepl ldap cldap kdc drepl winbind > ntp_signd kcc dnsupdate dns > security = auto > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > interfaces = 192.168.3.3/24 127.255.255.255/8 > bind interfaces only = Yes > hosts allow = 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1 LOCAL/unixdom > > dns forwarder = 127.0.0.2 > > I've already tried adding: > > lanman auth = Yes > client lanman auth = Yes > > but that didn't change anything. -- Denis Cardon Tranquil IT Systems Les Espaces Jules Verne, b?timent A 12 avenue Jules Verne 44230 Sai...

I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really don't want to use BIND. Should my DHCP server send ddns updates to Samba's internal DNS for client leases? Thanks, -- Greg J. Zartman Board Member Koozali