search for: unix_token

...on. Either way, no backup DC to recover with. Finally, which logs would you like to see? My winbindd-idmap log has nothing but segfaults logged. What log should I check? The only thing which stood out was the smbd log, which I pasted part of below. [2017/01/10 13:00:45.581992, 0] ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-7) in user token to a UID. Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: [2017/01/10 13:00:45.659202, 0] ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) Security token SIDs (3): SID[ 0]: S-1-5-7 SID[...

...over with. > > Finally, which logs would you like to see? My winbindd-idmap log has > nothing but segfaults logged. What log should I check? The only thing > which stood out was the smbd log, which I pasted part of below. > > [2017/01/10 13:00:45.581992, 0] > ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) > Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-7) in user token to a UID. > Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: > [2017/01/10 13:00:45.659202, 0] > ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) > Security token SIDs (3): >...

I started getting NT_STATUS_INVALID at a client location recently and now everything has stopped working. Upon a day of searching and testing, I realized that my idmap.ldb is likely corrupt. How can I recover from this, shy of creating a new domain from scratch? The NAS devices no longer authenticate users so files are inaccessible, computers cannot access the sysvol, and sysvolreset/sysvolcheck

...t; Finally, which logs would you like to see? My winbindd-idmap log has >> nothing but segfaults logged. What log should I check? The only thing >> which stood out was the smbd log, which I pasted part of below. >> >> [2017/01/10 13:00:45.581992, 0] >> ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) >> Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-7) in user token to a UID. >> Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: >> [2017/01/10 13:00:45.659202, 0] >> ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) >> Security tok...

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:57:30 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just found this in a log. It is the smbd log, to be exact. > > [2016/10/27 16:54:11.689360, 0] > ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:107(security_token_to_unix_token) > Unable to convert SID (S-1-5-11) at index 9 in user token to a GID. That is Authenticated Users, have you given any of the BUILTIN users and groups a uid/gidNumber ? If so, try removing them. I normally just give 'Domain Users' & 'Domain A...

...Looks like it is still checked (in master) in: _srvsvc_NetShareSetInfo() is_disk_op = security_token_has_privilege( session_info->security_token, SEC_PRIV_DISK_OPERATOR); /* fail out now if you are not root and not a disk op */ if (session_info->unix_token->uid != sec_initial_uid() && !is_disk_op) { DEBUG(2,("_srvsvc_NetShareSetInfo: uid %u doesn't have the " "SeDiskOperatorPrivilege privilege needed to modify " "share %s\n",...

...t; Finally, which logs would you like to see? My winbindd-idmap log has >> nothing but segfaults logged. What log should I check? The only thing >> which stood out was the smbd log, which I pasted part of below. >> >> [2017/01/10 13:00:45.581992, 0] >> ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) >> Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-7) in user token to a UID. >> Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: >> [2017/01/10 13:00:45.659202, 0] >> ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) >> Security tok...

...samba4-dc2 samba[2811]: /usr/sbin/samba_kcc: ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb root at samba4-dc2:/var/log/samba# tail syslog Aug 22 15:04:28 samba4-dc2 smbd[17917]: Right[ 0]: SeRemoteInteractiveLogonRight Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: [2019/08/22 15:04:31.678220, 0] ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-21-1712526294-259020848-313593124-9877) in user token to a UID. Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: [2019/08/22 15:04:31.679042, 0] ../...

...hares or log into a RDS-host. Trying to access a share returns "The security ID structure is invalid". Logging into WIndows and authenticating to other services with the domain credentials works. I have lots of these messages in the log: [2015/12/10 14:11:44.400918, 0] ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:107(security_token_to_unix_token) Unable to convert SID (S-1-5-21-2973170849-3284262837-3971445600-1120) at index 3 in user token to a GID. Conversion was returned as type 1, full token: [2015/12/10 14:11:44.491517, 0] ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) Security to...

...nameupdate_done: Failed DNS update with exit code 110 log.smbd: lots of messages like these right from the start: [2023/11/07 18:56:08.211331, 1] ../../source3/printing/printer_list.c:255(printer_list_get_last_refresh) Failed to fetch record! [2023/11/07 18:56:11.590717, 0] ../../source4/auth/unix_token.c:95(security_token_to_unix_token) Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-21-2269650170-3990761244-2407083512-1124) in user token to a UID. Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: [2023/11/07 18:56:11.590888, 0] ../../libcli/security/security_token.c:51(security_token_debug) Security token...

...amed.conf files (the ones from /etc/bind) > > root at samba4-dc2:/var/log/samba# tail syslog > > Aug 22 15:04:28 samba4-dc2 smbd[17917]: Right[ 0]: > SeRemoteInteractiveLogonRight > Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: [2019/08/22 15:04:31.678220, 0] > ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) > Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: Unable to convert first SID > (S-1-5-21-1712526294-259020848-313593124-9877) in user token to a UID. > Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: > Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: [2019/08/22 15:0...

On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:52:45 +0100 Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Again, my exact same experience. > > LP > On Jun 11, 2024 at 14:58 +0100, Bailey Allison via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > > Hey Rowland, > > > > Just wanted to say you are 100% correct, and it does (seemingly) > > nothing, at least

...; > _srvsvc_NetShareSetInfo() > > is_disk_op = security_token_has_privilege( > session_info->security_token, > SEC_PRIV_DISK_OPERATOR); > > /* fail out now if you are not root and not a disk op */ > > if (session_info->unix_token->uid != sec_initial_uid() && > !is_disk_op) { DEBUG(2,("_srvsvc_NetShareSetInfo: uid %u doesn't have > the " "SeDiskOperatorPrivilege privilege needed to modify " > "share %s\n", > (unsigned i...

Hello list: I recently installed and configured samba4 file server.I add it to domain succesfully ,then configuring shares with but I couldn´t acces to shares. I provisionesd samba AD DC without rfc2307.This log.samba say: [2016/02/17 16:09:04.653139, 0] ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:107(security_token_to_unix_token) *Unable to convert SID (S-1-5-32-554) at index 7 in user token to a GID. * *Conversion was returned as type 0, full token:* [2016/02/17 16:09:04.653236, 0] ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) Security token SIDs (9): SID[...

Hi Upgrading without knowing whats the problem I feel a bit like with Windows or lots of comercial software: "The next version will solve all your problems" and we all know that's never true. I appreciate any help. Cheers -------- Mensaje reenviado -------- Asunto: NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID in a SDC Fecha: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:22:25 -0500 De: Kasandra Padisha

...e with exit code 110 > > log.smbd: lots of messages like these right from the start: > > [2023/11/07 18:56:08.211331, 1] > ../../source3/printing/printer_list.c:255(printer_list_get_last_refresh) > Failed to fetch record! [2023/11/07 18:56:11.590717, 0] > ../../source4/auth/unix_token.c:95(security_token_to_unix_token) > Unable to convert first SID > (S-1-5-21-2269650170-3990761244-2407083512-1124) in user token to a > UID. Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: [2023/11/07 > 18:56:11.590888, 0] > ../../libcli/security/security_token.c:51(security_token_...

...c/bind) > > > > root at samba4-dc2:/var/log/samba# tail syslog > > > > Aug 22 15:04:28 samba4-dc2 smbd[17917]: Right[ 0]: > > SeRemoteInteractiveLogonRight > > Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: [2019/08/22 15:04:31.678220, 0] > > ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:79(security_token_to_unix_token) > > Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[17918]: Unable to convert first SID > > (S-1-5-21-1712526294-259020848-313593124-9877) in user token to a UID. > > Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: > > Aug 22 15:04:31 samba4-dc2 smbd[1791...

..., 2] ../source3/lib/interface.c:341(add_interface) added interface eth0 ip=192.168.0.18 bcast=192.168.0.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 [2016/05/11 08:09:36.418379, 2] ../lib/util/modules.c:196(do_smb_load_module) Module 'samba4' loaded [2016/05/11 08:09:36.444927, 0] ../source4/auth/unix_token.c:93(security_token_to_unix_token) Unable to convert second SID (S-1-5-21-508106755-2976483754-4106360514-513) in user token to a GID. Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: [2016/05/11 08:09:36.445462, 0] ../libcli/security/security_token.c:63(security_token_debug) Security toke...

...ng and found test commands like this: rpcclient -I 10.18.1.4 -U administrator -c srvinfo atr2 Password for [JUE\administrator]: Cannot connect to server. ?Error was NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID Here I got this invalid SID error. The log file shows me: [2024/03/24 22:23:53.903483, ?0] ../../source4/auth/unix_token.c:95(security_token_to_unix_token) ?Unable to convert first SID (S-1-5-21-3102633239-3317503863-27722425-500) in user token to a UID. ?Conversion was returned as type 0, full token: [2024/03/24 22:23:53.903588, ?0] ../../libcli/security/security_token.c:51(security_token_debug) ?Security toke...

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:52:09 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Slightly off-topic, but I thought setting those set the limits for > going into the NIS attributes tab in Windows. I understood the Samba > wiki to explain that using those lines is how you set the upper and > lower limits that Windows sees and uses. Is this incorrect? > > Lead