Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "universalssh".
Did you mean:
universalis
2017 Dec 31
3
Legacy option for key length?
...ed shorter keys without disallowing them.
But, by all means, force people to use old versions.? That's got to
advance security, doesn't it?? Who knows, maybe you might even cause a
fork.? Then there'd be openssh, which doesn't work with lots and lots of
stuff, and there'd be universalssh which works with everything, which
has all of the latest goodness of openssh (because, why wouldn't it?)
without any of the nastiness.? Then Debian and Red Hat would switch, and
openssh would become an also-ran.? Not a terrible result for the world
but a bad look for the core openssh develo...
2017 Dec 31
2
Legacy option for key length?
On 30/12/17 09:46, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote
> On Thu 2017-12-28 21:31:28 -0800, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
>> Why not make minimum key length a tunable, just as the other options
>> are?
> Because the goal of building secure software is to make it easy to
> answer the question "are you using it securely?"
>
That answer is wrong.? The suggestion, which allowed