search for: uniprocessors

I'm trying to install ocfs using RHAS 2.1 uniprocessor kernel on a vmware gsx server 3.0 virtual machine and I'm getting the unresolved symbols error when I try to start ocfs. I'm using the following packages: ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-2.4.9-e-1.0.11-1.i686.rpm My kernel is 2.4.9-e.38 uniprocessor (compiled by me). Questions: 1) Am I using the

If you have an AGP video card which you aren't actually using you can try selecting the minimum possible AGP apperture (window whatever) size (possibly even disable it?). This might help. Also removing the AGP card and using a junk 1-8MB svga card will also possibly work. In my experience the linear framebuffer of video cards is by far the greatest memory hog these days. Cheers, MaZe.

Hi, Is this "Unresolved Symbols" issue only occurring on VMware with e.38? We have OCFS users want to update their kernel to e.34 or e.38 without VMware. Please advise, Thanks! Roger--- -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:20 PM To: Sunil Mushran Cc: ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: ENC: ENC:

As I said before, I'm not a linux expert. In which file of kernel source can I look for any missing code ? And specially what do I have to check ? __________________________________________ Mauro Staretz - MI Montreal Inform?tica Ltda Microsoft MCSE+I / MCDBA / MCP - Oracle OCP Tel: 55-21-2291-6116 R.2104 Fax: 55-21-2533-6028 __________________________________________ -----Mensagem

Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver

I followed your instruction to compile OCFS and received the following errors: [root@RAC1 ocfs-1.0.11]# ./configure --with-kernel=/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-e.38/linux checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are

Hi there, I'm currently using CentOS 4.3 (Server edition) in a HP DC 5100 with the IntelR 915GV chipset, powered by a PIV 3.0GHZ. Now I'm facing a problem, with memory. I got myself 4GB of memory, the system bios detects it correctly, but in Linux can only see around 3.5gb memory. With the default kernel-smp (I use hyperthread) or with kernel-hugemem , I have the same results.

We have Xeon IA32 dual-processor servers running Centos 3.5 in an HPC batch-only compute grid configuration . We have yum update operating automatically with default updates being applied weekly. Because of the workload pattern of long-runing jobs, the servers tend to stay up without a reboot for very long periods. Recently, yum installed an updated kernel 2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp; when we got

Do you have anything detailing what the goal of each phase in Xenrt is? Phases 4 and 5 seem to be pretty much identical. Thanks, Paul Larson _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello! I'm setting up Asterisk on a new system. In the past, all of my Asterisk boxes have either been embedded-style systems that do not supoort APIC, or multi-processor systems where APIC comes along with SMP. However, now I'm trying to install Asterisk on a single CPU (and non-HT) system that does support APIC (A P4 Northwood an Intel 845 chipset). I've used both RHEL3 and

This caused particularly poor performance when booting a server in uniprocessor mode for debugging reasons, and had 4 dom0 vcpus competing for 1pcpus worth of time. -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

This change makes it so that instead of using smp_wmb/rmb which varies depending on the kernel configuration we can can use dma_wmb/rmb which for most architectures should be equal to or slightly more strict than smp_wmb/rmb. The advantage to this is that these barriers are available to uniprocessor builds as well so the performance should improve under such a configuration. Signed-off-by:

This change makes it so that instead of using smp_wmb/rmb which varies depending on the kernel configuration we can can use dma_wmb/rmb which for most architectures should be equal to or slightly more strict than smp_wmb/rmb. The advantage to this is that these barriers are available to uniprocessor builds as well so the performance should improve under such a configuration. Signed-off-by:

http://dovecot.org/tmp/concurrency.c I'd want to know what results this program gives with different systems. Please test and reply (but don't bother if someone already replied with the same OS+result). I expect it to print: - SMP kernels: "page size cut" once in a while - UP (uniprocessor) kernels: Nothing - The most important thing is that it never prints "broken

Hi Booting my Xen Dom0 on Debian Etch (Kernel is the prebuild one from bits.xensource.com), I found that only one cpu core (of two: dual core) is recognized by the (dom0-)Kernel. Googling this issue, I found on xen-devel-list that xen kernel is named smp but isn''t really doing so. Is there any (prebuild) kernel that I can use for smp? Thanks Gregor Reich

On 04/08/2015 01:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:47:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> This change makes it so that instead of using smp_wmb/rmb which varies >> depending on the kernel configuration we can can use dma_wmb/rmb which for >> most architectures should be equal to or slightly more strict than >> smp_wmb/rmb. >> >>

On 04/08/2015 01:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:47:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> This change makes it so that instead of using smp_wmb/rmb which varies >> depending on the kernel configuration we can can use dma_wmb/rmb which for >> most architectures should be equal to or slightly more strict than >> smp_wmb/rmb. >> >>

My setup is as follows: Motherboard: Tyan S2895 CPU: Two Opteron 275s Memory: 4 GB Disk: Three 250 GB SATA drives attached to a 3Ware 9500S-4LP RAID card Video: Nvidia GeForce 7800 The only hardware that I have added to the motherboard is the 3Ware card and the Nvidia card. The disks are configured as a RAID 5 array, and the machine boots from this array. I installed CentOS 4.2 x86 on this

...grading from RHEL3WS to CentOS 4.4. I've upgraded two already, with one left to go. On the system with RHEL3WS, 'top' shows statistics for each processor and what processor # each process is running on. On the systems running CentOS 4.4, the output of 'top' looks like that of a uniprocessors system - there are no statistics for each processor and it doesn't show which processor each process is running on. However, /proc/cpuinfo shows the two processors. Does this mean that my OS isn't seeing the second processor, or has the behavior of top changed between the two OS versions?...

Kathy, Thank you very much! Peter Olson Alcatel-Lucent Member of Technical Staff Services Technologies 1960 Lucent Lane Rm 7G334 Naperville, IL 60566 peterolson@alcatel-lucent.com Phone: 630 979 0573 Mobile: 630 430 6926 -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com Sent: