Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "uniontest".
2004 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
...nd/2002-07-14-MiscTests3.c:159: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strcpy'
/usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-07-14-MiscTests3.c:163: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strcat'
/usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-08-02-UnionTest.c: In function `main':
/usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-08-02-UnionTest.c:14: warning: return type of 'main' is not `int'
/usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-11-07-Redefinition.c:28: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declarati...
2004 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
Jeff,
Actually, that was my fault. I forgot to remove the non-existent
directories from the configure.ac file. That's done and committed
now, so the advice is still the same: update configure script :)
Reid.
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 09:53, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> Configure gives me these errors on FreeBSD. I'm proceding with the build anyway to see what happens. Don't worry :)
2005 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] tabs
...ticValues.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-05-24-Alloca.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-06-25-FWriteInterfaceFailure.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-07-14-MiscTests3.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-07-30-SubregSetAssertion.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-07-30-UnionTest.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-07-30-VarArgsCallFailure.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-08-02-UnionTest.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-09-08-PointerShifts.c
Index: test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-10-12-TooManyArguments.c
Index: test/Regression/CodeGen/Generic/BasicInstrs.c...
2004 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
...-14-MiscTests3.c:159: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strcpy'
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-07-14-MiscTests3.c:163: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strcat'
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-08-02-UnionTest.c: In function `main':
>
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-08-02-UnionTest.c:14: warning: return type of 'main' is not `int'
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/CFrontend/2002-11-07-Redefinition.c:28: warning: parameter names (without types) in fun...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...lo
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-expr_stmt
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-14-initialize-string
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-BitfieldHandling
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-VarSizeArray
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-08-BaseType
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-08-VirtualFunctions
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-13-C...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...Regression/C/sumarray2d | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-14-initialize-string | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | 0.0037 532 0.0019 * 0.0019 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | 0.0031 772 0.0025 * 0.0023 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest | 0.0017 576 0.0019 * 0.0018 |...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | 0.0040 532 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | 0.0080 800 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest | 0.0040 576 0.0040 * 0.0040 |...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | 0.0039 524 0.0015 * 0.0015 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | 0.0023 792 0.0021 * 0.0020 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest | 0.0027 568 0.0069 * 0.0015 |...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | 0.0015 552 0.0010 * 0.0010 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | 0.0013 840 0.0013 * 0.0012 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest | 0.0008 600 0.0010 * 0.0010 |...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...| n/a - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields |
> 0.0000 580 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest |
> 0.0000 580 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest |
> 0.0000 624 0.0000 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-
> UnionBitfields | 0.0000 580 0.0000
> * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-
> UnionTest | 0.0000 580 0.0000
> * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-
> LocalTypeTest | 0.0000 624 0.0000
>...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...3-05-14-AtExit.ll 2 1868 0 0.01 1859 0 0.01 1859
2003-05-14-expr_stmt.ll 2 1780 0 0.01 1764 0 0.01 1764
2003-05-14-initialize-string.ll 1 1789 0 0.01 1777 0 0.01 1777
2003-05-21-BitfieldHandling.ll 1 8810 0 0.01 8798 0 0.01 8798
2003-05-21-UnionBitfields.ll 2 3555 0 0.01 3543 0 0.01 3543
2003-05-21-UnionTest.ll 2 2331 0 0.01 2319 0 0.01 2319
2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest.ll 1 3195 0 0.01 3183 0 0.01 3183
2003-05-22-VarSizeArray.ll 2 2389 0 0.01 2377 0 0.01 2377
2003-05-23-TransparentUnion.ll 3 2753 0 0.01 2741 0 0.01 2741
2003-05-26-Shorts.ll 2 22518 0 0.01 22509 0 0.01 22509
2003-05-31-CastToBool.ll 7 6621...