Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unionref".
Did you mean:
unioned
2010 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
On Jan 11, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Talin wrote:
> I'm working on a new version of the patch.
>
> Another thing I wanted to ask about - do you prefer to have one
> giant patch that has everything, or a series of incremental patches?
> I can see advantages either way.
A series of incremental patches is strongly preferred, starting with
LangRef.html.
> Normally I would want
2010 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
I'm working on a new version of the patch.
Another thing I wanted to ask about - do you prefer to have one giant patch
that has everything, or a series of incremental patches? I can see
advantages either way.
Normally I would want to do this as a series of incremental patches, however
this is a rather large project and it may take me quite a while before it's
completely done. I don't
2010 Jan 13
7
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
...gt;
> -Chris
>
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100112/de2f07ac/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: unionref.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100112/de2f07ac/attachment.obj>