search for: unionref

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unionref".

Did you mean: unioned
2010 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
On Jan 11, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Talin wrote: > I'm working on a new version of the patch. > > Another thing I wanted to ask about - do you prefer to have one > giant patch that has everything, or a series of incremental patches? > I can see advantages either way. A series of incremental patches is strongly preferred, starting with LangRef.html. > Normally I would want
2010 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
I'm working on a new version of the patch. Another thing I wanted to ask about - do you prefer to have one giant patch that has everything, or a series of incremental patches? I can see advantages either way. Normally I would want to do this as a series of incremental patches, however this is a rather large project and it may take me quite a while before it's completely done. I don't
2010 Jan 13
7
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
...gt; > -Chris > > -- -- Talin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100112/de2f07ac/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: unionref.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 8332 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100112/de2f07ac/attachment.obj>