Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "unintrusively".
Did you mean:
intrusively
2014 Aug 05
3
How to update MySQL with CentOS 6 in most unintrusive way - in regard to perl and PHP packages
Dear fellow CentOS users,
for my few hobby projects (web games + forums) I have been using CentOS 5
(then 6) with Drupal and PostgreSQL plus few custom PHP and Perl scripts
written by mysef.
Since PostgreSQL version delivered with CentOS package has been a bit
dated, I always used the PGDG packages:
# rpm -qa | grep -i pgdg
pgdg-centos93-9.3-1.noarch
2017 Jul 06
4
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Hello,
I just subscribed to the list to join the discussion after being
blindsided by the change and reading Dirk Eddelbuettel's reply to my
bug report at https://bugs.debian.org/866768 .
As far as I can tell the advantages of site library are:
1. Saves disk space and a little bit of user time spent installing and
upgrading.
2. Other Debian package manages, like pip, default?to
2017 Jul 06
1
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Hi,
> I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its
> predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you give write
> permissions). It clearly helps us at work because everybody sees by
> the default the same packages. I have also spoken with different R
> Core members and several find the default installation below $HOME and
> in a versioned directory
2017 Jul 06
2
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Hi,
As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion :-)
2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>:
>
>
> I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its
> predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you give write
> permissions). It clearly helps us at work because everybody sees by
> the default the
2010 Jan 06
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add simple cross-block DSE.
Hello,
This patch implements cross-block dead store elimination for a simple
scenario -- which was somehow important in my case --, i.e. when a
store has only one memory dependence in a function.
This patch is a bit narrow-minded (e..g, only store instructions are
checked for memory dependencies), but I can always make it more
generic, if you give me pointers *and* my code is correct.
Cheers,
2010 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add simple cross-block DSE.
Hi Gianluca, did you look at Jakub Staszak's "Non-local DSE" patch
he posted to the mailing list a while ago?
Ciao,
Duncan.
2017 Jul 06
0
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Pavel,
Your tone does not exactly help in this discussion.
Briefly, I (like many other people) consider Linux and Unix to be
multi-user systems. You can argue as passionately for a default
installation in /usr/loca/lib/R/site-library as you did against. And
some of your arguments are just silly ("dangerous group": dude, it is
one 'sudo addgroup r-adm' [or anotther name...])
2017 Jul 07
0
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:02:52PM +0200, Sergio Oller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion :-)
>
> 2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>:
> >
> >
> > I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its
> > predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you
2017 Aug 25
2
Building LLVM's fuzzers
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com>
wrote:
> Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>
> >> wrote:
2017 Sep 11
2
Building LLVM's fuzzers
Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> writes:
> Justin,
> Calling appendToUsed has horrible complexity and if we call it in
> every function clang consumes tons of memory (6Gb when compiling one
> of the clang's source files). This killed my machine today :)
>
> The solution is to call appendToUsed once per module, instead of once
> per function.
Oh right,
2017 Jul 07
1
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
On 7 July 2017 at 05:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:02:52PM +0200, Sergio Oller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion
> :-)
> >
> > 2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>:
> > >
> > >
> > > I
2014 Feb 25
4
[RFC, PATCH] core/pxe: Add architecture-specific discovery request for PXE config file
Hi all,
>> In other words, the dhcp server has to start the client on the
>> correct binary for it's arch and by virtue of running different bins,
>> we can determine the most appropriate config file for the client?
>
> That is definitely one way to deal with it.
>
> There is no way around the fact that you have to have different binaries
> for different
2017 Aug 24
3
Building LLVM's fuzzers
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:20
2010 Dec 23
36
Weird issue with converting floats to integer
Any idea why this calculates the integer the way it does?
irb> ("291.15".to_f * 100.0).to_i
=> 29114
Thanks,
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
2015 Feb 20
6
[PATCH v4 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
Changes since v3:
- Use a single dma_attr for all DMA-API allocations in instmem instead of one
per allocation
- Use device.info.ram_size instead of pfb->ram to check whether VRAM is present
outside of nvkm
Changes since v2:
- Cleaner changes for ltc
- Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments
Changes since v1:
- Add missing else condition in ltc
- Remove extra flags that slipped into
2015 Feb 11
9
[PATCH v2 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
Changes since v1:
- Add missing else condition in ltc
- Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c.
Original cover letter:
Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy
RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device
can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to, and can
trick
2015 Jan 23
8
[PATCH 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
A series I have waited too long to submit, and the recent refactoring made
me pay the price of my perfectionism, so here are the features that are at least
completed
Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy
RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device
can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to,
2015 Feb 17
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
Thanks Ilia for the v2 review! Here is the v3 of this IOMMU support for GK20A
series.
Changes since v2:
- Cleaner changes for ltc
- Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments
Changes since v1:
- Add missing else condition in ltc
- Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c.
Original cover letter:
Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove