search for: unintrusively

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "unintrusively".

Did you mean: intrusively
2014 Aug 05
3
How to update MySQL with CentOS 6 in most unintrusive way - in regard to perl and PHP packages
Dear fellow CentOS users, for my few hobby projects (web games + forums) I have been using CentOS 5 (then 6) with Drupal and PostgreSQL plus few custom PHP and Perl scripts written by mysef. Since PostgreSQL version delivered with CentOS package has been a bit dated, I always used the PGDG packages: # rpm -qa | grep -i pgdg pgdg-centos93-9.3-1.noarch
2017 Jul 06
4
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Hello, I just subscribed to the list to join the discussion after being blindsided by the change and reading Dirk Eddelbuettel's reply to my bug report at https://bugs.debian.org/866768 . As far as I can tell the advantages of site library are: 1. Saves disk space and a little bit of user time spent installing and upgrading. 2. Other Debian package manages, like pip, default?to
2017 Jul 06
1
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Hi, > I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its > predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you give write > permissions). It clearly helps us at work because everybody sees by > the default the same packages. I have also spoken with different R > Core members and several find the default installation below $HOME and > in a versioned directory
2017 Jul 06
2
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Hi, As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion :-) 2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>: > > > I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its > predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you give write > permissions). It clearly helps us at work because everybody sees by > the default the
2010 Jan 06
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add simple cross-block DSE.
Hello, This patch implements cross-block dead store elimination for a simple scenario -- which was somehow important in my case --, i.e. when a store has only one memory dependence in a function. This patch is a bit narrow-minded (e..g, only store instructions are checked for memory dependencies), but I can always make it more generic, if you give me pointers *and* my code is correct. Cheers,
2010 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add simple cross-block DSE.
Hi Gianluca, did you look at Jakub Staszak's "Non-local DSE" patch he posted to the mailing list a while ago? Ciao, Duncan.
2017 Jul 06
0
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
Pavel, Your tone does not exactly help in this discussion. Briefly, I (like many other people) consider Linux and Unix to be multi-user systems. You can argue as passionately for a default installation in /usr/loca/lib/R/site-library as you did against. And some of your arguments are just silly ("dangerous group": dude, it is one 'sudo addgroup r-adm' [or anotther name...])
2017 Jul 07
0
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:02:52PM +0200, Sergio Oller wrote: > Hi, > > As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion :-) > > 2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>: > > > > > > I have used such settings (such as un-setting R_LIBS_USER or its > > predecessors) for over a decade, it just works (if you
2017 Aug 25
2
Building LLVM's fuzzers
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> writes: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> > >> wrote:
2017 Sep 11
2
Building LLVM's fuzzers
Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> writes: > Justin, > Calling appendToUsed has horrible complexity and if we call it in > every function clang consumes tons of memory (6Gb when compiling one > of the clang's source files). This killed my machine today :) > > The solution is to call appendToUsed once per module, instead of once > per function. Oh right,
2017 Jul 07
1
Regarding R_LIBS_USER
On 7 July 2017 at 05:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:02:52PM +0200, Sergio Oller wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As comments are welcome I will give my two cents and a patch suggestion > :-) > > > > 2017-07-06 10:42 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>: > > > > > > > > > I
2014 Feb 25
4
[RFC, PATCH] core/pxe: Add architecture-specific discovery request for PXE config file
Hi all, >> In other words, the dhcp server has to start the client on the >> correct binary for it's arch and by virtue of running different bins, >> we can determine the most appropriate config file for the client? > > That is definitely one way to deal with it. > > There is no way around the fact that you have to have different binaries > for different
2017 Aug 24
3
Building LLVM's fuzzers
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:20
2010 Dec 23
36
Weird issue with converting floats to integer
Any idea why this calculates the integer the way it does? irb> ("291.15".to_f * 100.0).to_i => 29114 Thanks, Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
2015 Feb 20
6
[PATCH v4 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
Changes since v3: - Use a single dma_attr for all DMA-API allocations in instmem instead of one per allocation - Use device.info.ram_size instead of pfb->ram to check whether VRAM is present outside of nvkm Changes since v2: - Cleaner changes for ltc - Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into
2015 Feb 11
9
[PATCH v2 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to, and can trick
2015 Jan 23
8
[PATCH 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
A series I have waited too long to submit, and the recent refactoring made me pay the price of my perfectionism, so here are the features that are at least completed Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to,
2015 Feb 17
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support
Thanks Ilia for the v2 review! Here is the v3 of this IOMMU support for GK20A series. Changes since v2: - Cleaner changes for ltc - Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove