search for: unintendedly

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2236 Bug ID: 2236 Summary: ssh-agent: fix unintended UNIX-domain socket removal Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs

Please, help me understand if 'use chroot' option in daemon config is secure enough. Rsync manual has following lines: As an additional safety feature, you can specify a dot-dir in the module's "path" to indicate the point where the chroot should occur.  This allows rsync to run in a chroot with a non-"/" path for the top of the transfer

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3660 Bug ID: 3660 Summary: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: scp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hello there, drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Source code is switch (dmaobj->base.access) { case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00004000; break; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_WO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00008000; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RW: dmaobj->flags2

Hey all, In troubleshooting a failing test for MetaSearch against 3-0-stable, I came across some undesirable (from my side, anyway) behavior in http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/bf87528b53f1422708ec0188d126cfca824ddc5c. A simple one-liner, it would appear, but AR::Base implements before_remove_const to do a bit of scoped method cleanup... It''s the only thing I can see that might

The dataset package is being loaded apparently by one of the packages that I am using. The loading of the datasets takes a long time and I would like to eliminate it. I thought the datasets were effectively examples so don't understand why they would be required at all. 1) How can I determine what is causing the datasets to be loaded? 2) How can I stop them from doing so? I am using the

Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. *INTRODUCTION* The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch labels when control flow is not directed

It seems that users may be disclosing unintended public key info when logging into remote hosts. Use of the words keypair/keyid/etc have been bastardized. Signature is likely better. Note also, the author may be without clue. Setup: [g] - refers to an administrative group of hosts [n] - refers to a host within that group ws[g][n] - management workstations [trusted] User ssh-add's keys for

Hello all, I''ve got the problem about the following simple application using autostart and repeat_every. A thread(?) is forked for processing task at first, but at sencond time two threads seem to be forked. My simple application code is... - In worker class class FooWorker < BackgrounDRb:Rails repeat_every 2.minutes first_run Time.now def do_work puts Time.now.to_s +

Hello, I wonder if I ran into a bug. If I do summary(df1$X1) -> df1.y df1.y a b c d e [1,] 50.74627 8.955224 17.91045 19.40299 2.985075 sort(df1.y) a b c d e [1,] 2.985075 8.955224 17.91045 19.40299 50.74627 my numbers are sorted but do not anymore correspond to the rownames. For me it is counterintuitive that solely the numbers are sorted and not the names. Is

Unintended Consequences of MP3 Compression to Hearing: http://www.informatik.fh-hamburg.de/~windle_c/Logologie/MP3-Gefahr/MP3-risk.html Based in some real facts or just someone makeing stuff up? Chris --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'

> syslinux[64].exe -i -f c: bootsecfile.bss > > This should have been the form for your desire as specifying the > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD instead of a removable drive like a > USB stick, "-f" is necessary. Hmm, instead? Could this syntax be some kind of unintended oversight?

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>wrote: > Hey Alex, > > Sorry if this is a silly question... are you asking if anyone "wants the > functionality proposed" or "wants to write the code for the functionality > proposed"? > *-Wimplicit-fallthrough* diagnostic is already implemented, and the patch in this thread

I have submitted patch for "--trace-symbol=symbol" (alias -y symbol) option. This option provides names of all the link time modules which define and reference symbols requested by user. This helps to speed up application development by detecting references causing undefined symbols. It also helps in detecting symbols being resolved to wrong (unintended) definitions in case of

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > syslinux[64].exe -i -f c: bootsecfile.bss > > > > This should have been the form for your desire as specifying the > > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD instead of a removable drive like a

This year Igor Kudrin put in a lot of work in enabling DWARF64 support in LLVM. At Facebook we are looking into it as one of the options for handling debug information over 4gigs in production environment. One concern is that due to mix of third party libraries and llvm compiled code the final library/binary will have a mix of CU that are DWARF32/64. This is supported by DWARF format. With this

Dear All, The metafor package currently fails CRAN checks on Sparc Solaris: http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metafor.html The problem is probably due to an unintended (= stupid) use of identical() in a couple tests. I have changed that to more appropriate tests using all.equal(). However, before I resubmit the package to CRAN, I would really like to make sure that the updated

Hi Peter, Martin, and others, Thanks for your replies. - The bugs apply to all systems that use GNU Readline, not just Linux or Arch Linux. - Readline version 6.3 changed the signal handling so that SIGWINCH is no longer handled automatically by the library. This means it's not currently possible for people using R on e.g. Linux to resize the terminal, or at least when they do so

> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > syslinux[64].exe -i -f c: bootsecfile.bss > > > > > > This should have been the form for your desire as specifying the > > > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > > > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD

Under AIX there are three security settings: expires = a fixed date at which an account is no longer valid maxage= weeks before a password expires maxexpires=max weeks during which a password can be changed by a user after expiration AFTER WHICH ACCESS IS NOT ALLOWED Beauty of maxage with expires is, that no manual intervention is required to block inactive users. With maxage=5 and expires=1 an