search for: unintend

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2236 Bug ID: 2236 Summary: ssh-agent: fix unintended UNIX-domain socket removal Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org...

...additional safety feature, you can specify a dot-dir in the module's "path" to indicate the point where the chroot should occur.  This allows rsync to run in a chroot with a non-"/" path for the top of the transfer hierarchy. Doing this guards against unintended library loading (since those absolute paths will not be inside the transfer hierarchy unless you have used an unwise pathname), and lets you setup libraries for the chroot that are outside of the transfer.  For example, specifying "/var/rsync/./module1" will...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3660 Bug ID: 3660 Summary: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: scp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Repo...

Hello there, drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Source code is switch (dmaobj->base.access) { case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00004000; break; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_WO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00008000; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RW: dmaobj->flags2

Hey all, In troubleshooting a failing test for MetaSearch against 3-0-stable, I came across some undesirable (from my side, anyway) behavior in http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/bf87528b53f1422708ec0188d126cfca824ddc5c. A simple one-liner, it would appear, but AR::Base implements before_remove_const to do a bit of scoped method cleanup... It''s the only thing I can see that might

The dataset package is being loaded apparently by one of the packages that I am using. The loading of the datasets takes a long time and I would like to eliminate it. I thought the datasets were effectively examples so don't understand why they would be required at all. 1) How can I determine what is causing the datasets to be loaded? 2) How can I stop them from doing so? I am using the

...lp either. It's common to mark fall-through locations with a comment, but parsing comments would incur a significant performance penalty and is probably an unhealthy approach overall. So the use of comment-only annotations is limited to manual inspections. Some time ago I've added the 'Unintended fall-through in switch statement' diagnostics to clang ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057180.html ). This is a proposal to introduce clang's unintended fall-through diagnostic to llvm/clang code. *DESCRIPTION OF 'UNINTENDED FALL-THROUGH IN SWIT...

It seems that users may be disclosing unintended public key info when logging into remote hosts. Use of the words keypair/keyid/etc have been bastardized. Signature is likely better. Note also, the author may be without clue. Setup: [g] - refers to an administrative group of hosts [n] - refers to a host within that group ws[g][n] - manageme...

Hello all, I''ve got the problem about the following simple application using autostart and repeat_every. A thread(?) is forked for processing task at first, but at sencond time two threads seem to be forked. My simple application code is... - In worker class class FooWorker < BackgrounDRb:Rails repeat_every 2.minutes first_run Time.now def do_work puts Time.now.to_s +

...a b c d e [1,] 2.985075 8.955224 17.91045 19.40299 50.74627 my numbers are sorted but do not anymore correspond to the rownames. For me it is counterintuitive that solely the numbers are sorted and not the names. Is there a way to sort names + numbers or is this behaviour of sort() unintended? Martin R 2.0.1-1 debian reposit.

Unintended Consequences of MP3 Compression to Hearing: http://www.informatik.fh-hamburg.de/~windle_c/Logologie/MP3-Gefahr/MP3-risk.html Based in some real facts or just someone makeing stuff up? Chris --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/o...

...the form for your desire as specifying the > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD instead of a removable drive like a > USB stick, "-f" is necessary. Hmm, instead? Could this syntax be some kind of unintended oversight? Are you saying that a command such as: syslinux.exe -i a: bootsecfile.bss is not supposed to change the VBR of a:, whereas a command such as: syslinux.exe -i a: performs the change of the VBR? I see several inconsistencies here. In theory, at least either --install or --Upda...

...ations with a comment, but parsing comments would incur a significant >>> performance penalty and is probably an unhealthy approach overall. So the >>> use of comment-only annotations is limited to manual inspections. >>> >>> Some time ago I've added the 'Unintended fall-through in switch >>> statement' diagnostics to clang ( >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057180.html >>> ). >>> >>> This is a proposal to introduce clang's unintended fall-through >>> diagnos...

...uot; (alias -y symbol) option. This option provides names of all the link time modules which define and reference symbols requested by user. This helps to speed up application development by detecting references causing undefined symbols. It also helps in detecting symbols being resolved to wrong (unintended) definitions in case of applications containing multiple definitions for same symbols with different types, bindings. Bugzilla - Bug - PR#28226 Patch for review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21550 - Shridhar Joshi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: &lt...

...desire as specifying the > > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD instead of a removable drive like a > > USB stick, "-f" is necessary. > Hmm, instead? Could this syntax be some kind of unintended oversight? Unintended oversight, unanticipated use, etc. that at least was on the side of caution. The check for fixed HDD instead of removable like floppy or USB stick was put in place first. Then the part about specifying a .bss output instead of writing the VBR was added in 2004. > Are...

...ulti-language environment. I think the alternative approach will be more fragile than modifying LLD as it relies on a more complex system, and each customer of LLD will have to implement this "sorting" in their own build systems. The use of -u also kind of abuses this flag, and might have unintended consequences. As was pointed out by Wen Lei. >From overhead perspective we only need to access few bytes of DWARF to determine if it's 32 or 64 bits. Customers who need DWARF64, already accept the overhead that it entails. Any thoughts? Thank You Alex -------------- next part -----------...

Dear All, The metafor package currently fails CRAN checks on Sparc Solaris: http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metafor.html The problem is probably due to an unintended (= stupid) use of identical() in a couple tests. I have changed that to more appropriate tests using all.equal(). However, before I resubmit the package to CRAN, I would really like to make sure that the updated package passes all checks also on Sparc Solaris. The issue/question of how to test p...

...so a long-standing bug in Readline where the callback interface didn't properly clear the line on SIGINT (^C). This means that "exiting" reverse-incremental-search with ^C would give an apparently empty prompt which still had some pending input, so if you hit ^C-Return then an unintended command would get executed. If they're not "bothering all that many people", then perhaps it's because everyone uses Windows or Mac OS X or RStudio. For me these are pretty significant bugs. The second one causes unintended code to be executed. Random code could delete files, f...

...> > > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > > > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD instead of a removable drive like a > > > USB stick, "-f" is necessary. > > > Hmm, instead? Could this syntax be some kind of unintended oversight? > > Unintended oversight, unanticipated use, etc. that at least was on the > side of caution. The check for fixed HDD instead of removable like > floppy or USB stick was put in place first. Then the part about > specifying a .bss output instead of writing the VBR was...

Under AIX there are three security settings: expires = a fixed date at which an account is no longer valid maxage= weeks before a password expires maxexpires=max weeks during which a password can be changed by a user after expiration AFTER WHICH ACCESS IS NOT ALLOWED Beauty of maxage with expires is, that no manual intervention is required to block inactive users. With maxage=5 and expires=1 an