search for: uninfect

..."Y2002","Y2003",..: 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 ... $ ccFLEDGE : int 6 6 6 5 6 7 6 7 6 5 ... $ rec2012 : int 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ... $ binage : Factor w/ 2 levels "ad","juv": 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ INFECTION: Factor w/ 2 levels "Infected ","Uninfected ": 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 ... $ all.rsLD : num -4.62 -6.19 -3.62 -4.19 -2.62 ... using either RECinf<-REC2[which (REC2$INFECTION=="Infected"),] or RECinf<-subset(REC2, INFECTION=="Infected") in both cases I get empty data frame (0 observations): > str(RECin...

...urement is log(expression) of a particular gene and can be assumed to be normally distributed. The 12 subjects are divided into the following groups: Infected, Vaccinated, Lesions - 3 measurements Infected, Vaccintaed, No Lesions - 2 measurements Infected, Not Vaccinated, Lesions - 4 measurements Uninfected, Not Vaccinated, No Lesions - 3 measurements Although presence/absence of lesions could be considered to be a phenotype, here I would like to use it as a factor. This explains some of the imbalance in the design (ie we could not control how many subjects, if any, in each group would get lesions...

Dear R users, Prof. Ripley just corrected my understanding of the use of weights in glm, which I thought would allow me to correctly use lmer. However I'm still having problems. My data takes the form of # of infected and uninfected individuals that were measured over time under different treatments. I'm using lmer to adjust for the repeated measures over time. In fitting the model: > model1=lmer(y~treatment+(time | ID),family=binomial,weights = total) where y = proportion of animals infected (number infected/t...

...say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although it appears to be a text file. Any suggestions on how to proceed appreciated. Guess I could delete it and copy over the file from an identical machine. Thanks in advance, B.J. CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el...

...I'm encountering some problems with coxme My data: I'm looking at the survival of animals in an experiment with 3 treatments, which came from 4 different populations, two of which were infected with a parasite and two of which were not. I'm interested if infected animals differe from uninfected ones across treatments. Factor 1: treatment (3 levels) Factor 2: infection state (infected/uninfected) Random effect 1: (population nested within infection state) modelling this with m<-coxme(Surv(day,status)~condition*infection+(1|infection/population),data=all) gives me the following Cox...

...bellow error. Jun 21 15:33:01 mail MailScanner[3657]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 767 bytes Jun 21 15:33:02 mail MailScanner[3657]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Jun 21 15:33:02 mail MailScanner[3657]: ERROR: Unable to create temporary directory Jun 21 15:33:02 mail MailScanner[3657]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages Jun 21 15:33:03 mail sendmail[3694]: l5LA2wY5003682: to=<test at mail.csbsl.com>, ctladdr=<root at mail.csbsl.com> (0/0), delay=00:00:05, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=120305, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent WHY IS THAT? Then, I disabled Selinux as follows. setenf...

...ly, and sure enough I can see that both factors have different effects on the data DEPENDING on what the value of the other factor is. I explain this all to my colleague - and she asks "but which ones are different?" This is best illustrated with an example. We have either infected | uninfected, and vaccinated | unvaccinated (the two factors). We're measuring expression of a gene. Graphically, in the infected group, vaccination makes expression go up. In the uninfected group, vaccination makes expression go down. In both the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, infection makes exp...

Hello; I'm running a FreeBSD 4.10-release-p2 box and both chkrootkit 0.44 & 0.45 report that my /sbin/init file is infected. It appears as though the egrep for "UPX" in the output of "strings" triggers the infected notice. When I copy the init file from an uninfected box to this one chkrootkit continues to report it as infected. Is chkrootkit reading a copy of the /sbin/init file stored in active memory? If my machine is compromised, which rootkit is installed / how can I find out which rootkit is installed? As a side note, neither Kaspersky AV nor rkhunter...

...factors have*>:* different effects on the data DEPENDING on what the value of*>:* the other factor is. *>:* *>:* I explain this all to my colleague - and she asks "but which*>:* ones are different?" This is best illustrated with an example.*>:* We have either infected | uninfected, and vaccinated | unvaccinated*>:* (the two factors).*>:* We're measuring expression of a gene. Graphically, in the*>:* infected group, vaccination makes expression go up. In the*>:* uninfected group, vaccination makes expression go down. In*>:* both the vaccinated and unvacci...

...ks as if lots of debugging strings are still in the binary. Odd that this "debugging version" would be in the wild. Peter, can you verify that it indeed is a virus? Unless it knows of ways to become root, you should be safe if you add a new user-account, place an infected binary and a few uninfected binaries in that users account. Make sure that you have an unmodified version available for comparison. On one hand I don''t like to approve this until Peter has verified this, but on the other hand if there is really a linux-virus on the loose, you all would like to hear about it ASAP ri...

I tried downloading R-2.7.2 (http://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/windows/base/R-2.7.2-win32.exe, both from Berkeley and cran) and both times I got a warning from Computer Associates eTrust Antivirus (version 7.1.710) that the Win32/Adclicker.JO trojan was detected: The Win32/Adclicker.JO was detected in C:\USERS\USER\APPDATA\LOCAL\MICROSOFT\WINDOWS\TEMPORARY INTERNET

Good day all, [Dovecot version 1.2.1] I've set up postfix and dovecot on Centos. I have a problem with the mail, it is begin received but not "processed" by dovecot. I've looked in the maillog file and found two problems; the first is that private/dovecot directory (I think it should be a directory) did not exist and the second problem is "mail transport

...r[15047]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Jul 22 14:49:02 mail MailScanner[15047]: Requeue: C04F79F002F.784A8 to 304C09F0012 Jul 22 14:49:02 mail postfix/qmgr[14869]: 304C09F0012: from=<raubvogel at gmail.com>, size=2518, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jul 22 14:49:02 mail MailScanner[15047]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages Jul 22 14:49:02 mail deliver(raub at domain.com): Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/lda Jul 22 14:49:02 mail deliver(raub at domain.com): Module loaded: /usr/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so Jul 22 14:49:02 mail dovecot: auth(default): master in: USE...

...eached Dec 14 02:54:53 mail MailScanner[18700]: MailWatch: Starting up MailWatch SQL Blacklist Dec 14 02:54:53 mail MailScanner[18700]: MailWatch: Read 0 blacklist entries Dec 14 02:54:56 mail MailScanner[18700]: Requeue: D6773400AB09.ADBA7 to 24EDE400AABD Dec 14 02:54:56 mail MailScanner[18700]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages Dec 14 02:54:56 mail postfix/qmgr[1756]: 24EDE400AABD: from=<dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org>, size=6784, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Dec 14 02:54:56 mail MailScanner[18700]: Deleted 1 messages from processing-database Dec 14 02:54:56 mail MailScanner[18700]: MailWatch: Lo...

...540090dd892657804d1099c54d6f770d > >> > >> > > And it is binary identical to the Austria CRAN one. > >> > >>> You're the first to report it, and 2.7.2 has been out for almost a > >>> month, so I think it's likely that the CRAN copy is uninfected. > >>> > >> > >> Sounds promising. Perhaps it's a false positive from eTrust. > >> > >> > >> > > Likely. A quick Googling indicates that other programs have been > > "caught" too. > > This link is illuminati...