search for: unilateral

...ich means we can't use Bluetooth for Wacom tablets without opening > up access to file transfer over Bluetooth as well ... What is the threat you're trying to mitigate, specifically?? I don't see how pairing a tablet would allow file transfers.? An unauthorized device can't unilaterally pair with your system.

...tablets without opening >>> up access to file transfer over Bluetooth as well ... >> >> >> What is the threat you're trying to mitigate, specifically?? I don't see >> how pairing a tablet would allow file transfers.? An unauthorized device >> can't unilaterally pair with your system. > If you enable Bluetooth on a workstation (by starting the 'bluetooth' > service), then a normal user on the workstation can (for example) > transfer files to/from a mobile phone - which is something we don't allow > > Users don't have to...

...uot;subscribed" mailboxes as returned by > the LSUB command. This command returns a tagged OK response only > if the subscription is successful. > > A server MAY validate the mailbox argument to SUBSCRIBE to verify > that it exists. However, it MUST NOT unilaterally remove an > existing mailbox name from the subscription list even if a mailbox > by that name no longer exists. > > Note: This requirement is because a server site can > choose to routinely remove a mailbox with a well-known > name (e...

...otice that when I have two clients connected and one of them reads a new message, the server sends a status update which contains the number of unseen messages, but doesn't specifically say which ones have changed. I think the solution to this problem, while not wasting bandwidth, is to issue a unilateral FETCH FLAGS response whenever a flag changes. There doesn't seem to be a way to get dovecot (I'm using 0.99.10) to do this. Can the 1.0-test versions do this? cya .sig

Hi, It is my understanding that the eigenvectors of a circulant matrix are given as follows: 1,omega,omega^2,....,omega^{p-1} where the matrix has dimension given by p x p and omega is one of p complex roots of unity. (See Bellman for an excellent discussion on this). The matrix created by the attached row and obtained using the following commands indicates no imaginary parts for the

On 14 October 2015 at 14:32, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > CoC is not going to stop or prevent any harassment. True. > The current administrators of the mailing > lists, or the organizers of the LLVM conferences already have the means to > deal with it. Not really. We haven't had to ban anyone from the list or kick anyone from a

...r, it will very probably > end up here, because I will reply only to the list, especially if it is > in the middle of a thread. > > I will decide if I want to reply direct to anybody that emails me, I > suspect that is what Achim decided. Rowland, I would suggest not doing that unilaterally. I do get many mails that go to me personally, and not also to the list. To these, I kindly ask that they re-ask the question on the list, so others can benefit from the reply. This ensures I don't accidental breach privacy. Most posters realise their error and politely apologise. And...

Hi all! A while ago I caught a discussion re Samba and LDAP SAM backend, with OpenLDAP and nss_ldap. It seems that the reason the smbd process keeps crashing (and thus losing connections) has something to do with the fact that the LDAP standard allows connections to be unilaterally closed by the directory server, and this was causing Samba to crash. Again - this is my hazy recollection of the thread. I'm seeing this behavior in my setup (Samba LDAP-based PDC). Is my summary above (mostly) correct? Is there a fix for this? Is it included as part of 2.2.6 or is it a p...

Hi, There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The "main" group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very unilateral communication skills. The other one is not managed at all, judged by the amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published there (Ubuntu tutorials, Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so since I've successfully managed the Slackware Lin...

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 18:59, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We have *not* appointed any such committee at this point. > > (...) > > The appeal is to the board of the Foundation. I don't expect the board to > > *be* the committee

...uot;subscribed" mailboxes as returned by > the LSUB command. This command returns a tagged OK response only > if the subscription is successful. > > A server MAY validate the mailbox argument to SUBSCRIBE to verify > that it exists. However, it MUST NOT unilaterally remove an > existing mailbox name from the subscription list even if a mailbox > by that name no longer exists. > > Note: This requirement is because a server site can > choose to routinely remove a mailbox with a well-known > name (e...

Dovecot does not clear the subscription file from non-existent folders. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20180523/01c4fc03/attachment.html>

...of the image: this implies that the shrinking check won't > actually work properly, causing a failure. > > We also miss the information about the partition to expand, so > virt-resize merely adds a new empty partition at the end to fill the > extra space. OK so let's decide unilaterally on some fields. Currently there is a "size" field which contains the compressed size in bytes. We also require: "virtual_size": Virtual size of the image in bytes. Note this is not the same as the uncompressed size (except for "raw"). This is the size of...

I don't feel like I can unilaterally declare this topic closed, since there was an objection to that last time. But with no additional feedback after another week, I'd still really like to close this out, and start moving forward with the original plan, again... On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:28 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at go...

On 1 July 2015 at 15:20, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > Group all monkey's paw optimisations together, and enable them only if an > extra compiler flag is supplied. Or failing that, at least have a compiler > flag that will disable all of them (while leaving all the safe optimisations > enabled). So, are you suggesting we get rid of all undefined AND

...> Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 15:48:29 >> Subject: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook > >> Hi, >> >> There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The >> "main" group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very >> unilateral communication skills. The other one is not managed at >> all, judged by the amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published >> there (Ubuntu tutorials, Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). >> >> I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so since >> I&...

...ith such > experience will chime in. > It was already mentioned earlier in the thread that: - The individual commits cannot be approved in the sense of approving a PR. - Comments on individual commits are easily lost. To elaborate on the latter: - GitHub would not show comments in-line if it unilaterally believes that the comment no longer applies to the version of the code you are looking at. - GitHub would proactively hide and collapse comments in the "conversation view", especially if it believes (for such bad reasons as line noise in later commits) that an earlier comment is not rel...

...mailboxes as returned by >> the LSUB command. This command returns a tagged OK response only >> if the subscription is successful. >> >> A server MAY validate the mailbox argument to SUBSCRIBE to verify >> that it exists. However, it MUST NOT unilaterally remove an >> existing mailbox name from the subscription list even if a mailbox >> by that name no longer exists. >> >> Note: This requirement is because a server site can >> choose to routinely remove a mailbox with a well-known &gt...

On 1 July 2015 at 17:15, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm proposing that LLVM unilaterally replace most undefined behaviour with > implementation-defined behaviour. That's precisely the problem. Which behaviour? Let's have an example: struct Foo { long a[95]; char b[4]; double c[2]; }; void fuzz(Foo &F) { for (int i=0; i<100; i++) F.a[i] = 123; } Ther...

...easoning from judgements, you would know that judges just look > at the parts of the GPL that are not in conflict with the law. Judges know that > making the GPL void as a whole would be a desaster. There is nothing in conflict with law about prohibiting distribution. And you cant' just unilaterally pick parts of the licence that permits distribution that you like and ignore the rest. >> So apply copyright law without a license. You can't distribute. I >> agree that the FSF interpretation about distributing source with the >> intention that the end user does the lin...