search for: unifiedtreebuilder

...GitHub/monorepo. The following build factories will be ported and if you use one of those for your bots, you are all covered: * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeBuildFactory (31 bots) * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots) * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots) * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots) * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11 bots) * ABITestsuitBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder * ClangLTOBuilder (2 bots) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder * LLDPerformanceTesuiteBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder Some build factories will be deprecated. If you use one of these, please change your bot to use so...

...ts, you are all covered: >> >> >> >> * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeBuildFactory (31 bots) >> >> * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots) >> >> * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots) >> >> * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots) >> >> * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11 bots) >> >> * ABITestsuitBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder >> >> * ClangLTOBuilder (2 bots) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder >> >> * LLDPerformanceTesuiteBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder >> >> >> >> Some build fac...

...langBuilder.getClangCMakeBuildFactory (31 bots) >>>> >>>> * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots) >>>> >>>> * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots) >>>> >>>> * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots) >>>> >>>> * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11 bots) >>>> >>>> * ABITestsuitBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder >>>> >>>> * ClangLTOBuilder (2 bots) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder >>>> >>>> * LLDPerformanceTesuiteBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder &g...

...> >>>> * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots) > > >>>> > > >>>> * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots) > > >>>> > > >>>> * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots) > > >>>> > > >>>> * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11 bots) > > >>>> > > >>>> * ABITestsuitBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder > > >>>> > > >>>> * ClangLTOBuilder (2 bots) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder > > >>>> > > >>>> * LLDPerfor...

...e the default I guess, the main drawback I see right now is that it could affect bots that are relying on the default and wouldn't get assertions anymore? That said our upstream buildbots infra seems to have explicit defaults: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/blob/master/zorg/buildbot/builders/UnifiedTreeBuilder.py#L125-L127 For LLD, I don't think we have auto-detection, but I'd be on-board with auto-detecting it and have -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD default to the auto-detection when empty. But that's another topic... -- Mehdi On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:50 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at...

Yeah, that's one I'd be in favor of fixing, if it's still the case. On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:38 PM Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm curious how much of this is due to not using LLD? Last I checked, using ld.bfd instead of LLD (or gold) was one of my major build time issues, and somehow our default configuration would use ld.bfd. >