Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "unici".
Did you mean:
unipi
2005 Jun 22
2
Question: TEQL via gateway
Yesterday I posted a question, but I guess too much detail is provided
that no one would bother to read, so I rephrase the question and
hopefully some one may be willing to read. Sorry to spam.
I am using TEQL on two computers, each with two network interfaces. The
two eth0 are connected directly, and the two eth1 are connected via a
gateway (a linux machine). The problem is that when I send
1999 Nov 15
2
agenda
Hi,
what is the agenda of this list? I was surprised to find out about an
OpenSSH developers mailing list without the developers of OpenSSH
knowing about this.
Strange,
Niels.
1998 Sep 21
2
x filemanager
Hi there,
I've got two questions, and I'll list them in order of importance. (1) Is
there a way, or is there any research/development going into unearthing a way,
to mount a samba filesystem like any other filesystem under UNIX?
And (2), does anyone know of a good X filemanager? What I would really
like to do is be able to mount a Samba directory or resource and treat
it like any
1998 Jun 04
5
Linux DoS attack through autoprobing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The autodetection routines for some linux modules can tie up the
machine for several seconds at a time. By trying to open devices not
present on the machine, a local user can disrupt service considerably.
A very simple exploit is
victim$ ls /dev/*/*
repeatedly.
A suggested fix is to remove or chmod 0 device nodes for hardware
not installed on the
2005 May 02
4
Multiple network cards on same subnet problem (arp_filter=1)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this might seem like a classical problem but I''ve trouble getting this
working correctly:
# ifconfig ### output stripped down:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:FC:2B:EB:1B
inet addr:192.168.5.220 Bcast:192.168.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:44:60:EC:58
inet
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...te files in that directory too. All three of these
operations are equivalent, you are just modifying the contents of the
parent directory.You cannot get any one of these permissions without the
others.
This has always been a problem. There is a solution however (in Linux,
Solaris, and other modern Unicies).
There is something called the "sticky bit" in a permission mask. When
applied to a directory, only the OWNER of a directory can remove and
rename files, regardless of whether you can add new files. In this case,
you need to make the directory create mask "1775". The extra o...