Displaying 20 results from an estimated 76 matches for "unhealthi".
Did you mean:
unhealthy
2011 Mar 01
2
Entering table with multiple columns & rows
Hi,
I'm having difficulty with getting a table to show with
multiple rows and columns. Below is the commands that I've typed in and
errors that I am getting. Thank you.
Laura
Table trying to enter:
Diet: Binger-yes: Binger-No: Total:
None 24 134 158
Healthy 9 52 61
Unhealthy 23 72 95
Dangerous 12 15 27
>
2002 Dec 03
0
winbind unhealthy
RH 7.2 using samba 2.2.7 (installed from samba built RPM) for now...
Security=domain using winbind to authenticate against windows PDC.
Testparm says:
winbind uid = 10000-20000
winbind gid = 10000-20000
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
template shell = /bin/false
winbind separator = +
winbind cache time = 15
winbind enum users = No
2011 Mar 02
4
Contingency table in R
Hi,
I have a table in R with data I needed and need to create a contingency table out of it. The table I have so far looks like this:
Binger
r
DietType No Yes
Dangerous 15 12
Healthy 52 9
None 134 24
Unhealthy 72 23
These are the error messages that I keep getting whenever I try to get a contingency table. I'm not sure why it won't work
2016 Nov 09
4
CTDB and samba private dir (+ldap)
hi everyone
an attempt to set up a cluster, I'm reading around and see
some howto writers would say to put "private dir on the FS
cluster" - one question I have: is this correct? necessary?
I have partial success, I get:
$ ctdb status
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0 10.5.6.32 OK
pnn:1 10.5.6.49 UNHEALTHY (THIS NODE)
Generation:323266562
Size:2
hash:0 lmaster:0
hash:1
2012 May 11
0
CTDB daemon crashed on bringing down one node in the cluster
All,
I have a 3 node CTDB cluster which serves 4 'public addresses'.
/etc/ctdb/public_addresses file is node specific and present in
the above path in participating nodes. All the nodes run RHEL 6.2.
Other ctdb config files such as "nodes" and "public_addresses" are placed
on a shared filesystem mounted on a known location (say, /gluster/lock)
On starting CTDB
2014 Jul 03
0
ctdb split brain nodes doesn't see each other
Hi,
I?ve setup a simple ctdb cluster. Actually copied the config file from an existing system.
Thats what happens:
Node 1, alone
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0 10.0.0.1 OK (THIS NODE)
pnn:1 10.0.0.2 DISCONNECTED|UNHEALTHY|INACTIVE
Generation:1369816268
Size:1
hash:0 lmaster:0
Recovery mode:NORMAL (0)
Recovery master:0
Node1, after start of ctdb on Node 2
Number of nodes:2
pnn:0
2023 Jan 26
1
ctdb samba and winbind event problem
Hi to all,
I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit
Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The
first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a
Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the new
node to /etc/ctdb/nodes at the end of the list. And the virtual IP to
/etc/ctdb/public_addresses, also at the end
2011 Feb 28
4
R help
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could provide me with help in entering the attached dataset into R? I've been having a hard time in trying to figure out how to assemble it into both a frequency table and a bar graph within R. I've been trying to present the way I have the data arranged in Excel Spreadsheet into R. I am uncertain what the correct commands and exact techniques are into
2005 Jan 08
1
What is acceptable network latency for voipconnection?
That "program" will be detected by your ISP within a day or so,
determined to be a virus, and your service will get disconnected...which
n turn will not help your latency or jitter at all.
VoIP can tolerate a fair amount of latency; latency over about 100ms is
heard as a perceptible delay resulting in a connection that appears to
be half duplex.
Jitter, on the other had, is the real
2020 May 06
2
Nodes in CTDB Cluster don't release recovery lock
Hello all,
First of all, apologies if this isn't the right location for this question,
I couldn't find a CTDB specific mailing list or IRC so I figured the
general one would be appropriate. Please let me know if this question is
better placed elsewhere.
I'm trying to test clustered samba and have a two node CTDB setup
(Following the guide here:
2016 Nov 09
0
CTDB and samba private dir (+ldap)
On 09/11/16 16:05, lejeczek via samba wrote:
> hi everyone
>
> an attempt to set up a cluster, I'm reading around and see
> some howto writers would say to put "private dir on the FS
> cluster" - one question I have: is this correct? necessary?
>
> I have partial success, I get:
>
> $ ctdb status
> Number of nodes:2
> pnn:0 10.5.6.32 OK
>
2011 Feb 16
1
Faceting article
Hi,
I've been involved in developing a fairly complex site at
http://tilt.ft.com recently, and have acquired an unhealthy interest in
faceting. I couldn't find any good non-academic guides to faceting
strategy on the web, so I thought I'd have a stab at writing one.
I'm not completely happy with it, but it's been sitting in my drafts for
long enough that I thought it
2010 May 20
0
WG: Which version of CTDB
I did a new rsync and compiled ctdb new. This version did not establish a
new config file!!!: /etc/sysconfig/ctdb. I had to use my old one.
After starting ctdb recognizing that ctdb wants his state directory in
/usr/local/var/ctdb/state
I could not fix that in /etc/sysconfig/ctdb file. So I had do mkdir
/usr/local/var/ctdb manually.
After starting ctdb on both nodes all nodes rest unhealthy. And
2016 May 23
1
[OT] Re: Ransomware?
ToddAndMargo <ToddAndMargo at zoho.com> writes:
> On 05/20/2016 06:31 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Those can also
>> often be made accessible by Samba as read-only CIFS shares, for people
>> to recover their own files. It's invaluable for people not to have to
>> bother their local sysadmin to get last night's copy of the files they
>> just
2023 Jan 26
1
ctdb samba and winbind event problem
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:59 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit
> Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The
> first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a
> Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the
2016 Nov 10
1
CTDB IP takeover/failover tunables - do you use them?
I'm currently hacking on CTDB's IP takeover/failover code. For Samba
4.6, I would like to rationalise the IP takeover-related tunable
parameters.
I would like to know if there are any users who set the values of these
tunables to non-default values. The tunables in question are:
DisableIPFailover
Default: 0
When set to non-zero, ctdb will not perform failover or
2019 May 16
2
CTDB node stucks in " ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445"
Hi everybody,
I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version
4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version
4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch.
After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come
back and remains in state "UNHEALTHY".
I can find that in the syslog:
May 16 11:25:40 ctdb-lbn1 ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not
listening on TCP port 445
May 16
2005 Jan 09
2
What is acceptable network latency forvoipconnection?
In the real world (or at least in my world) we use undersubscribed
internet connections that come with a service level agreement (SLA) that
guarantees that the jitter, delay, and packet loss with be within
defined parameters in the service agreement.
With most DSL and Cable you will not get a SLA, with the cheapest T1s
you might get one, but the only penalty to the ISP if they do not meet
is a
2015 May 19
0
ctdb_client.c control timed out - banning nodes
Hello,
We are using CTDB / Samba to serve a number of windows users, at this point around 1200. We have a 4 node CTDB setup.
CTDB version - ctdb-1.0.114.7-1
Samba Version - sernet-samba-4.1.16-10
In recent months we've seen a big problem when 1 of the CTDB nodes is stopped or disconnected either manually or resulting from a problem. On some occasions, all other nodes get banned if a node
2012 Jul 02
4
[LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for intended fall-throughs between switch cases
Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits,
There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to
make a formal proposal and post it here.
I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended
fall-through locations between switch cases.
*INTRODUCTION*
The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch
labels when control flow is not directed