Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ungep".
Did you mean:
unger
2011 Jan 23
1
[LLVMdev] Pointers in Load and Store
...my own code.
However, the website of safecode says that it works only with version
2.6 or 2.7 of llvm whereas I use version 2.8 of llvm.
To get around the problem, I plan to do as follows :
(1) Do not install safecode with llvm 2.8 (as it may or may not work)
(2) Create a new pass named "unGep", "Breaks Constant GEPs"
(3) The new pass derives from FunctionPass (because safecode does so,
if I had to write it, ModulePass would have been good enough.)
(4) The RunOnFunction method of the unGep pass invokes
addPoolChecks(F) passing it the function F. I will modify
addGetElem...
2011 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] Pointers in Load and Store
On 1/21/2011 10:46 PM, Surinder wrote:
> John,
>
> I have looked at the SAFECode and thought following sould work
>
> if (isa<Constant>(I.getOperand(0)))
> { Out<< "*** operand 0 is a constant ******";
> if (Instruction *operandI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(I.getOperand(0)))
> { Out<<
2011 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] Pointers in Load and Store
John,
I have looked at the SAFECode and thought following sould work
if (isa<Constant>(I.getOperand(0)))
{ Out << "*** operand 0 is a constant ******";
if (Instruction *operandI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(I.getOperand(0)))
{ Out << "********operand is an instruction ****";
if (GetElementPtrInst *gepI =