search for: ungainly

...he X is the same as in the previous example. This cutsie little command was extremely useful for composing programs that were flexible and could use input matrices of any size without modifying the code. I realize that you can accomplish the same by Y <- X[2:length(X)] in R, but this method is ungainly, particularly when subsetting matrices rather than vectors. If anyone has advice, I'd be grateful, Bryan L. Brown Integrative Biology University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712 512-965-0678 stonefly@mail.utexas.edu [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...7; /* same length as in DEFINE_RAW_FLEX above. */ To avoid repeating the open-coded "17", this could either be a define: nv50_hdmi_enable(...) { ... #define data_len 17 DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct nvif_outp_infoframe_v0, args, data, data_len); ...rest of function... #undef data_len } or an ungainly but compile-time calculated value that exposes some DEFINE_FLEX internals: const u8 data_len = (sizeof(args_u) - sizeof(*args)) / sizeof(*args->data); (Maybe a helper is needed for that?) #define STACK_FLEX_COUNT(name, member) \ ((sizeof(name##_u) = sizeof(*(name))) / sizeof(*(name)->mem...

...ega)' > testlabel<-'E-test' > op<-'dev lab' > oplabel<-'Development Lab' > expr.label("SPC Chart for") I then use exprtitle in: plot(1:10,title= if(plotnum==1) parse(text=exprtitle) else NULL) However: this code seems convoluted and ungainly I don't always get the results I want Any suggestions? Leif Kirschenbaum Senior Yield Engineer Reflectivity, Inc. (408) 737-8100 x307 leif at reflectivity.com

...e relaxed: test> listio_ list( a=list( b=9, c='hello'), d=1:5) test> listio[[ c(1,2)]] [1] "hello" test> The same goes for assignment into recursive lists. I find this feature essential, so I eventually wrote the workarounds below. But I'm sure these are slow and ungainly. Could this feature not be added as a primitive? cheers Mark assign( '[[', function( var, ...) { pg_ .Primitive( '[[') vv_ as.name( 'var') for( i in c(...)) vv_ call( 'pg', vv, i) eval( vv) }) assign( '[[<-', function( var, ..., value) { i...

...=list( b=9, c='hello'), d=1:5) > test> listio[[ c(1,2)]] > [1] "hello" > test> > > The same goes for assignment into recursive lists. > > I find this feature essential, so I eventually wrote the workarounds below. But > I'm sure these are slow and ungainly. > > Could this feature not be added as a primitive? [[ is already a primitive, and nowhere that I can see is it documented that it allows an argument of length 2. So it is neither a bug nor a feature, but a difference from S. If you submit a patch based on the current R-devel sources, we...

One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack of user quotas. Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system per user will not be manageable. I would agree that today that is the case however I personally don''t see this as an insurmountable problem. However the questions

On 14/05/2019 13:09, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:13:35AM +0800, qw wrote: >> I use the wifi adaptor, Edimax AC1200, and its driver can be >> downloaded from >> >> 'http://www.edimax.com.tw/edimax/download/download/data/edimax/tw/download/for_home/wireless_adapters/wireless_adapters_ac1200_dual-band/ew-7822ulc'. >> >> >>

Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code, accordingly. So, with this, fix the following warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:779:47: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure

I think this discussion probably came up here already but I couldn't find much on the archives. Would you able to comment or correct whatever might look wrong. What options people think is more adequate to use with Gluster in terms of RAID underneath and a good balance between cost, usable space and performance. I have thought about two main options with its Pros and Cons No RAID (individual

In r219010, I merged integer and string fields into a single header field. By reducing the number of metadata operands used in debug info, this saved 2.2GB on an `llvm-lto` bootstrap. I've done some profiling of DW_TAGs to see what parts of PR17891 and PR17892 to tackle next, and I've concluded that they will be insufficient. Instead, I'd like to implement a more aggressive plan,