search for: unforgeable

On 2 Sep 2015, at 02:54, Joseph Tremoulet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Reading further, I see both that addrspacecast "can be a no-op cast or a complex value modification"[2] and that bitcast "may only be [used on pointers] with the same address space"[4]. > > So I'm getting the impression that it's ok to have a model with

...can be trusted). If we understand things correctly, patent law only recognizes a document as prior art (i.e. for _completely_ invalidating a patent claim) if it was a) posted publically and widely, and available/accessible to people reasonably skilled in the subject matter, and b) has a clear and unforgeable publication date. The first requirement should be met by posting this disclosure to several formus related to the subject; the second requirement is where you come in. TO HELP US IN THIS MATTER: you can easily, undeniably and unforgeably confirm that this disclosure is publically accessible today...

...can be trusted). If we understand things correctly, patent law only recognizes a document as prior art (i.e. for _completely_ invalidating a patent claim) if it was a) posted publically and widely, and available/accessible to people reasonably skilled in the subject matter, and b) has a clear and unforgeable publication date. The first requirement should be met by posting this disclosure to several formus related to the subject; the second requirement is where you come in. TO HELP US IN THIS MATTER: you can easily, undeniably and unforgeably confirm that this disclosure is publically accessible today...

Hi I have shorewall/iptables running on my server (pub) but access to localhost is blocked then I attemp to use ping localhost, telnet localhost 25, echo Hello | sendmail -v root@localhost. All these commands were run after using shorewall reset and creating the attached file. All these commands work with shorewall clear. My problem is I can''t email the root messages from (pub) to

Thanks, this makes the use case much more clear. Now though, as far as I would like actually to see supported in LLVM the capability of not having any special meaning assigned to address space 0 your proposal goes slightly in contrast with how I always thought of address spaces in LLVM. I also have to say that I don’t know deeply how address spaces are meant to be intended in LLVM so my vision of